Lion, Bear and the Serpent --
Zionists and Holy Land Violence
Michael Aaronsohn
[Reprinted from The Freeman, December, 1938]
Once again -- in the twentieth century -- the Land of Canaan has
become an arena of bloodshed and slaughter. Violence, wasting and
destruction are heard again in the Holy Land.
It is an old, old story only slightly modernized by radio and bombing
plane. The wonder of it all is that so wee a parcel of land should
arouse so vast a curiosity and alarm. How, for example, can the
tragedy of Palestine be compared in magnitude with that of Spain or
China?
Palestine's woes are neither novel nor extraordinary. That area
comprising ten thousand square miles of land, which is not rich in
minerals or other natural resources, is suffering from a chronic
disease of world-wide character. Anyone who sincerely seeks
enlightenment on the dismal situation should not limit his
investigation to specifically Arabic or Jewish historians and
publicists. For a well-rounded and amazingly applicable analysis of
the Palestine malady, one should read Henry George's work on the land
question in Ireland, published in 1881.
Then, in 1881 -- as now -- Ireland (Eire) presented a diseased
condition prevalent in every part of the civilized world. Then -- as
today -- in Ireland, the bete-noire was the British Empire. Then, in
1881 -- as now -- in Ireland, the real spring from which all the evils
flowed was the hoary institution of land monopoly. Today (in 1933), in
Ireland, 1.4 per cent of the population own all the land, about
20,000,000 acres; while 5,000,000 Irish are landless.
Line by line the same may be said of Palestine today. Several years
before his assassination, Arlosoroff wrote: "At the top of this
small, but commanding minority of the Arabic population in Palestine,
is the landlord class, the effendi. the owners of large estates. These
are often absentee landlords living in the cities of Palestine or
abroad. They derive their income from the rent of their lands, an
income usually sufficient to enable them to live in grand style, to
entertain lavishly, to cultivate the social elegances, and hence to be
extremely popular in aristocratic social circles. It is estimated that
this class owns about 80 per cent of the land in Galilee, about 50 per
cent in southern Palestine, and about 85 per cent in Transjordaaia."
Another reliable report states that 4,702,000 dunam of land in
Palestine are held in large estates.
There is one factor which makes the situation of the Jews in
Palestine today more heart-sickening than the woes of the Irish in the
nineteenth century. It as the appalling conspiracy of at least two
nations to harass the Jews everywhere, even in the Holy Land. It is
this which distinguishes the calamity of the children of Israel from
that of all other peoples. Yet when we turn to the history of Israel,
we come upon many experiences of similar extent and intensity of
suffering. The pattern of these experiences is so well defined that it
takes on the character of prophecy as well as of geometric regularity.
Consider, for example, what the prophet Amos said at a time when the
social .and economic conditions in Palestine closely paralleled the
story written in our generation: "As if a man did flee from a
lion, and a bear met him; or went into the house, and leaned his hand
on the wall, and a serpent bit him."
When this parable is unfolded in language familiar to Georgists, we
learn that wherever the Israelite turned he found himself face to face
with a monstrous adversary -- the land monopolist. Most staggering is
it indeed today when the "lover of Zion" discovers the
serpent -- within his own house, within the land of promise, the land
of hope, the long-prayed for haven of rest and spiritual salvation.
Today the lion is the land monopolist in Europe, or even America; the
bear is the effendi; the serpent, the Jewish land speculator himself.
In September, 1934, Rabbi Silver of Cleveland wrote: "The story
of Palestinian speculation in real estate and orange groves is a
faithful replica in miniature of the disastrous Florida boom in 1925.
The rapid urban development of Palestine which has been stimulated by
the stupendous immigration into the country in the last few years is
destroying the Jewish character of many of the farming settlements
which were built at so much cost of labor and substance. ... What,
therefore, appears to some as the mounting sap of wholesome growth
may, in reality, prove to be deadly, creeping dry rot. ..."
The bear and the serpent might have been mastered by the flaming
spirit of the Jewish pioneers. Palestine might have been reconstructed
according to the patterns laid down by the framers of the American
Zionist Organization's program, which embodied the highest and noblest
ideals of social justice along lines of sound political economy. But
Palestine could not escape the fatal consequences of concentrated land
speculation within an area of ten thousand square miles. The
irrepressible explosion -- "the day of judgment" -- might
have been postponed had the same series of events taken place in
Uganda or Australia. But in Palestine the poverty of the fellahin was
so deep and broad that there was but one avenue, of release open to
them, outside of slow starvation -- revolt, revolt against their
oppressors. And as is the way of such phenomena the fellahin were
turned aside in their wrath from their real enemies. National and
religious prejudices were cunningly employed by the effendis to save
themselves from the hands of the fellahin. And the Jews, who for the
most part regarded themselves not only as the friends, but as the
benefactors of the down-trodden fellahin, became the victims.
True, the enterprise, the industry, and the large capital investments
of the Jews have greatly increased the aggregate wealth of Palestine.
But as Henry George taught and the universal experience of mankind
confirms this principle of law, ''material progress does not merely
fail to relieve poverty; actually it produces it." True, no Arab
peasant in Palestine has been illegitimately dispossessed of his land.
Yet the phenomenal increase in the value of land in Palestine
accomplished the same baneful result. Speculative land values
accompanied by an increase in the cost of living, together with a
reduction in the earnings of the Arab peasant, -- these factors made
it impossible for the fellah to retain possession of his land and to
maintain himself even at a bare subsistence level. Hence, from the
perspective of his mud-sills, the fellah could associate his
impoverishment only with the ceaseless influx of Jewish immigrants.
Naturally, the highminded Zionist is shocked. He thinks the Arab
peasant is ungrateful. He imagines his Arab neighbor has been solely
swayed by German and Italian intrigues. Rapprochement with the
fellahin is accepted by all Jews -- except the fascist Revisionists --
as the paramount objective. But there can be no permanent peace
between Arab and Jew in Palestine until the ideals set forth in the
1918 platform of the American Zionist Organization become the law of
the land -- and not merely of that portion of Palestine held by the
Jewish National Fund. There must be one and the same law for the Arab
and for the Jew. The jealousy and fears that now array Jew against
Arab and Arab against Jew will give way to a true fraternity when land
monopoly In all its ramifications is eradicated from the Holy Land.
How is this to be accomplished? How are the three monsters, the
serpent, the bear and the lion to be conquered? Most assuredly not by
a campaign of vilification against the British Empire, nor by savage
conflicts with the Arab nationalists. An appeal must be made to the
hundreds of millions of Christians and the millions of Moslems as well
as to the several million Jews in every part of the world to free the
Holy Land of the curse of land monopoly by the abolition of the system
of private ownership and the establishment of common ownership through
the medium known as the "Single Tax" program of Henry
George.
Thus Palestine should become, neither the homeland of the Jews nor an
Arab province, but the common heritage of all the population; and the
wealth created toy Arabs and Jews in Palestine should be THEIR common
wealth. In November, 1929, Rabbi Judab Magnus of Jerusalem made this
statement: "Palestine should not be a place of political
'domination' at all on anyone's part. It is of much more importance to
mankind than that. It does not 'belong' to Jew, Christian or Moslem,
but to all of them together, to humanity."
One of the outstanding leaders who appeared before the British Royal
Commission less than two years ago was David Ben Gurion. "The
Bible," he testified, "is the 'Mandate' upon which the
Jewish people rest their claim to Palestine."
Two dominant thoughts may be discerned in the Old Testament regarding
the fate or destiny of Palestine. The first is that dealing with the "everlasting
covenant" made between God and the children of Israel, wherein
Palestine is designated the perpetual heritage of the descendants of
Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The second great thought is that Palestine
has been selected as the spiritual center of the world. This latter
idea is most vividly set forth In the words of the prophet Isaiah: "All
nations shall flow unto it. And many people shall go and say, Come ye,
and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God
of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his
paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the
Lord from Jerusalem."
To fulfill her traditional destiny, Palestine must become the
spiritual Switzerland of the world. As soon as Peace has spread her
beneficent wings over Palestine, prosperity will come to every village
and town; quietness and security will reign in all her borders as in
Switzerland today. Yet the analogy is not complete in this respect
only. For, just as little Switzerland is renowned throughout the
civilized world for her physical beauty and political harmony,
Palestine will draw to her parts hundreds of thousands of pilgrims and
tourists year toy year. They will come with reverent curiosity and
glowing eagerness to see with their own eyes the rivers, the hills,
the mountains, the woods, the cities, the villages and the shrines of
this, the most publicized, the most venerated country on all the
earth.
Let then the true-hearted Zionist and the equally high-minded Arab
point the accusing linger at the land speculator, who is making
merchandise of the sacred, good earth of Palestine, and say: "Thou
art the man! Thou art the cause of all our misery, our want, our
brutishness." Let the earnest Arab and the earnest Jew in
Palestine appeal to Christian, Moslem and Jew everywhere. Let them
appeal to their conscience, their intelligence, their imagination --
to their sense of justice. Above all, let them appeal to the deepest
and most powerful emotion, that of religious faith in the "Word
of the Lord." Let all the inhabitants of the Land of Canaan go to
the world with such a plea, and all the mighty forces of progress,
benevolence and righteousness will array themselves against the lion,
the bear and the serpent to fight under the banners of Amos, Isaiah,
and Henry George -- in the name of Truth and Brotherhood, and for the
glory of God.
|