How To Balance The Budget
Frank Chodorov
[Reprinted from The Freeman, February, 1939]
Americans spent some forty millions this past year on sport goods and
a newspaper headline writer gave the story this title: "American
Sports Budget $40,000,000." His use of the word "budget"
in this way is perhaps more correct, economically, than he suspected.
Bookkeepers have propagated the idea that a budget is a detailed plan
of spending income, or expected income. The ideal or "balanced"
budget is one that automatically closes the purse at a given danger
point.
But, even if we never heard the words "debit" and "credit,"
our existence is budgeted, for we live by production, our own or
others, and spending must stop as soon as production stops. In fact,
consuming and producing are but two phases of the same process,
distinguishable in thought but not in fact.
To return to our national sports budget. The baby wants a rubber
ball. The mother takes a dime from her house money, which represents
the production of the family provider, and secures the tail, which is
the production of ball-makers, from the rubber tree tappers in Africa
to the Main Street store clerk. The budget is balanced. The boy sells
newspapers, and some of this production goes into a catcher's mitt.
Perfect balance again. The sister-stenographer spends her wages on a
tennis racket, or the father, who operates a store, exchanges some of
his profits for a set of golf sticks. The exchange of services or
goods for goods or services is the perfect budgetary process.
The problem becomes a problem only when the element of credit is
involved, when one secures satisfactions on the promise to render
service in the future. For instance, the sister-stenographer "charges"
her tennis racket. And here the problem arises only when she is unable
to fulfill her promise; that is, she loses her job, she ceases to be a
producer.
Superficially it seems that the way to abolish budget problems is to
abolish credit, if it were possible to do so. But credit, or trust, is
both the oldest and most advanced mechanism for facilitating
exchanges. Imagine the difficulties a farmer would encounter in
exchanging heifers for an automobile directly, without the
conveniences of a bank and a checkbook. Money itself, in the final
analysis, is only an instrument of credit. But the keystone of any
credit structure is merely faith -- faith in the willingness and
ability of the borrower to liquidate the debt in the future.
As for willingness, honesty, there is no question. One's selfish
desire to secure more satisfactions through credit is sufficient
guarantee, to be crassly materialistic, to assure fulfillment of
agreement. The breakdown of any credit arrangement, individual or
national, is caused primarily by inability to produce the agreed upon
services or goods. It is in the stoppage or curtailment of production
that we must seek the solution of any budgetary problem.
It may be contended that this is true with individual or even
corporate budgets but not with national budgets. A government produces
nothing. How then can it balance its budget through production ?
True, government is a non-producer. But government exists only on the
production of the people, and if its exactions were not enforceable by
power instruments with which it is implemented, its expenses would be
curtailed as the production of the people diminished. Thus, its budget
would, like those of individuals or corporations, balance itself
automatically. It is the power of officials to levy on the production
of the people, that is, the power to levy taxes, that causes
unbalanced budgets. Not until this power of levying taxes is removed
from government can any nation hope to keep its budget in perfect and
permanent balance.
For, with taxation abolished the only source of revenue for social
purposes will be the social fund of rent. Common sense and justice
indicate that this fund should be used for the common needs of the
people. It is commonly produced, it grows with the increase in
population, it fattens on the enterprise of the people as a whole, and
the taking of it for community purposes does not deprive the producer
of a single thing.
On the other hand, the socialization of rent would be the greatest
incentive to production. The use of this fund for more roads and
bridges, for better police and fire departments, for recreational and
educational purposes, or, if you so decide, for free transportation,
electricity or telephone service, would permit the greatest production
of goods and services. The increased power of the people, 'thus
relieved of the burden of taxes, would reflect itself again in an
increased rent fund, which again would provide greater social
services.
Thus, and thus only, can an automatically balanced budget be
attained.
|