On Land as a Factor of Production
Eli Heckscher
[Quotes taken from Professor Heckscher's writings,
commented on by an unnamed contributor to Land & Liberty,
November-December, 1956]
The well-known Swedish economist Professor Eli Heckscher, in his book
Gammal och Ny Ekonomisk Liberalism (Old and New Liberalism),
has this to say :
Land or building sites of various kinds, water power,
mineral deposits, etc., have a value or command a price, and in many
cases a very high price. The question, however, is not whether the
natural resources should command a price, but whether this price
should create an income for their owners, and there is all
the difference in the world between these two questions. The
interest on capital is not only a necessary price but is also required
as an income, because otherwise saving would be very much
reduced, but nothing similar applies to the income derived from
natural resources, ground rent or whatever you will call it. In
other words: Saving is a result of endeavour, of conscious human
acting; but land, mineral deposits, water power, etc., are not in
any sense the result of human activity. If interest on capital
disappears saving will, to a more or less degree, stop; but if the
rent attaching to natural resources is withheld from their owners,
not a single acre of land, or ton of ore, or horsepower in a
waterfall, will cease to exist. Therefore, the price of natural
resources as an income for their owners can never become part in a "harmonious"
economic system
It therefore seems to me that it is impossible for a new economic
liberalism to reject in principle the idea of the community
appropriating the rent of natural resources.
Referring to the school of thought which is called Georgeism,
Professor Heckscher comments :
It is a belief sometimes met with even amongst
politically educated liberals, that Georgeism more or less coincides
with socialism. No mistake could be greater. Far from coinciding
with socialism, Georgeism is the most pronounced old-school
liberalism which now exists. It is even scarcely an exaggeration to
say that the social view represented by Georgeism is that the State
should collect the economic rent, but not be further concerned with
economic or social life
The appropriation of the ground rent is often proposed to take the
form of land value or ground rent taxation.
Its possibilities
and limitations would necessitate an extensive discussion which does
not belong here. What concerns us here is only the point of
principle that this programme must form part of the new economic
liberalism, which cannot fulfil its mission or live up to its
teaching without it.
|