The Land Problem in Mexico
Joseph M. Sinnott
[Reprinted from Land and Freedom, July-August
1940]
The history of Mexico is a history of a struggle for the soil of the
country.
Mayas, Zapotecs, Toltecs, Anahuacs, in slow succession rose to power
and affluence, became luxurious and corrupt, and disappeared before
the onslaughts of fresher, more vigorous tribes who fought to possess
the land.
No matter how they may have differed as to tribal and religious
customs, all these ancient Mexicans had common ideas regarding the
soil. Land was not held as private property. Its ownership was vested
in the tribe. Each family, however, was allotted a piece of land which
it cultivated independently. Certain lands were reserved for the
expenses of the government and the support of the priests. These lands
were cultivated by the common people.
In the fifteenth century, in the territories controlled by the
Aztecs, the last of the Anahuacs, the powers of the nobles were
increasing and some of them had acquired lordship over lands which had
belonged to conquered tribes and had reduced their inhabitants to
serfdom. A feudal form of society was thus in process of development.
It was against this sort of social structure that Cortez hurled his
gold-thirsty adventurers. Aided by other dissident tribes he soon
conquered the effete and luxurious Montezuma, Emperor of the Aztecs,
and hushed the country into peace by the power of his sword.
Along with his awe-inspiring equipment Cortez also brought the feudal
ideas of his homeland. The conquered lands, belonging nominally to the
Spanish Crown, were divided in most part amongst his officers. Later,
when the cross followed the sword, lands were also granted by the
crown for the benefit of the Church. All these lands were cultivated
by the original inhabitants who became mere serfs.
For himself, Cortez obtained the Marquesaclo del Valle which measured
25,000 square miles, contained 22 towns and counted a population of
100,000 souls. Mines, woods, waters, the entire civil and criminal
jurisdiction, and the right to the labor of the inhabitants were
included in this entailed estate which, being inalienable, passed to
the direct descendants. One lieutenant got 10,000 square miles with
its rich silver mines. Another received Xilotepec which included
130,000 vassals. Others received grants in proportion to their
supposed merits.
On all of these great entailed estates the natives were ground with a
remorseless fury. At first the Church protested against the barbarous
cruelties inflicted upon the hapless people but soon, it too, was
involved in the process of wringing wealth from the serfs and the
soil. The Spanish Crown, despite its many shortcomings, did its futile
best to curb the ferocious power of the landlords.
The poor natives whipped by man and scourged by famine had but a
choice of suicide or flight to enable the to escape their harsh
taskmasters. Thousands chose both these avenues of release from a life
of unremitting misery.
It was to lure the Indian back from his retreat in the jungles and
mountain fastnesses that the ejido was conceived. The ejidos were
plots of ground that were allotted the native. They were supposed to
be inalienable and for them, in his spare time, he was expected to
raise his own sustenance, the King's tribute, and contributions to the
clergy.
No sooner were the ejidos granted than the great landlords by dint of
force, bribery and deception began gradually to enclose them. Thus
began the struggle between great landlord and poor peasant which has
survived to this day and which has caused one bloody revolt after
another.
The revolutions of Mexico have been essentially agrarian in character
a struggle between the landed and the landless.
It was the disinherited and ragged outcasts who flocked to the
standards of Hidalgo and Morelos in 1810. For them it was a burning
agrarian struggle. And that was chiefly the reason why it was
defeated. The land holding interests combined and were too powerful to
be thrown off.
In 1823 the Mexican Congress abolished the further [unreadable] of
estates, but too late to repair the damage. The Cortez heritage, for
example, had grown to include one city, 157 towns, 89 great estates,
119 farms and 5 ranches with total population of nearly 200,000 souls.
Meanwhile the Church also had entered the picture on a grand scale
and by mortmain controlled "not less than one-half the real
estate of the country." That was the estimate of Lucas Alaman,
the clerical leader. It held mortgages on most of the remaining
agricultural properties and had become the national money lender.
Owing to special cleric privileges and exemptions, independent
agriculture suffered a constant handicap and the Church was able to
undersell other growers, thereby lowering market values. The Church,
of course, paid no salaries, rents, interest, excises or taxes of any
kind.
It has been estimated that the Texan revolt and the subsequent war
with the United States in 1845, cost the people of Mexico one-half of
their land. President Grant, a participant in the war, later
characterized it "as one of the most unjust ever waged by a
stronger against a weaker nation."
In 1856 the feeble Comonfort government ordered the sale of
clerically owned estates to the lessees at a price based on a rental
value of six per cent, or, should the renter desire to buy, the
property could be condemned and sold to the highest bidder. This
effort was no stronger than the government that sponsored it and was
soon discarded.
Emperor Maximilian and Empress Carlotta were shocked by the
conditions they found. They decreed in vain that the peon was
responsible only for his own debts and not those of his father. In
vain did they seek to shorten his hours of toil. In vain was corporal
punishment forbidden.
The Great Reform Laws of Juarez in 1867 also attempted to restore the
lands to the people but were checkmated at every turn by the combined
weight of landlords and clergy. Nevertheless constant effort was
exerted to relieve the condition of the disinherited.
In the late eighties and nineties, under the aegis of Porfirio Diaz,
the pendulum swung the other way. The peon reached his nadir. This was
the era of railroad construction and influx of foreign capital. As a
consequence, tilled and untilled lands acquired new values. A great
wave of speculation swept over the country. The foreigner was quick to
scent the exploitive possibilities of the situation and the condition
of the people became more and more intolerable. They partially threw
off the yoke in 1911 and then followed the revolutionary movement,
aimed at land reform, which has continued to this day.
A succession of leaders promised, deceived and were overthrown or
assassinated. Then a champion, Emiliano Zapata, purest and fairest of
all, glowed like a bright star gainst this sombre background. His
slogan was "Land and Liberty." He demanded freedom from the
feudal oppression of the great estates and restoration of the ancient
village lands. Zapata was betrayed and slain, but not until he had
advanced considerably the cause of the peasants.
Plutarco Elias Calles was the next important political figure to
dominate the scene. Calles really seemed to have the interest of the
peasants at heart and pushed agrarian reforms with unceasing zeal. He
advanced the cause of the ejido and loosened the clutching grip of the
Church. In the fields of labor his right hand man, Morones, organized
the Confederacion Regional Obrera Mexicana, or C.R.O.M., as it was
popularly called. This was a confederation of craft unions organized
on the same basis as the American Federation of Labor.
However, it soon became apparent that though the zeal of Zalles
continued, as far as agrarian reform was concerned, it seemed to
manifest a marked antipathy toward urban labor developments. In some
peculiar way, known only to 5enor Calles, he had become one of the
richest industrialists in the country. His interests embraced many
industries and it became particularly incensed at any threat of strike
on the part of labor. There was a clash of interests. The original
crusading zeal of the once poor school-master was quenched.
Senor Morones and the small clique who dominated the Z.R.O.M., were
also faring very well. They dashed about in the most expensive
automobiles and the diamonds flashed by Morones became a public
scandal. They all lived lavishly and their week-end parties in the
suburb of Tlalpan were notorious. They formed a club called the Grupo
Accion, which for luxury was unequalled except by millionaires' clubs
in the United States.
Now Calles had always chosen the current presidential candidate.
Against the advice of conservative friends he selected Lazaro Cardenas
to succeed the safe and pliable gambling concessionaire, Abelardo
Rodriguez. He was sure that he would be able to control Cardenas as he
had controlled Rodriguez, Ortiz Rubio, and other presidential puppets.
But this time it was different.
Everyone winked and grinned when Cardenas spoke of land reform,
better conditions for labor and a democratized army. They had heard
all this so many times before. But when the new president swung into
action and began to put his reforms into effect, the grins faded.
Meanwhile, the Marxian-inspired Vicente Lombardo Toledano had broken
off from the old, corrupt C.R.O.M., and formed the Mexican
Confederation of Labor or C.T.M., as it is known. It was organized on
the basis of Industrial Unionism and it established friendly relations
with the American C.I.O.
The Army' stood firmly behind the new president. With the backing of
peasants, workers and soldiers, Cardenas was able to drive Calles,
Morones and their satellites from the country.
Let no one be so naive as to suppose that Justice and Liberty have
but to raise their heads to have Injustice and Bondage flee before
them. Over and over again they have been trampled into the bloody mud.
And so after centuries of struggle, sacrifice, torture and death, the
advent of Lazaro Cardenas in 1934 still found the Mexicans in the grip
of the great estates. The reason for this is simple. When the landed
interests found themselves defeated in the agrarian areas they
transferred their maleficent activities to other spheres. They packed
the state governments, the courts, the labor tribunals, the local
magistracies and the police, with their creatures. Their company
guards roamed the countryside and spread terror in the hearts of the
people. On an average, it required five years to press a successful
suit through the courts.
Cardenas, supported by the rising tide of the labor movement under
Lombardo Toledano was able to purge all these agencies of their
reactionary and venal elements. New life seemed to surge through the
courts and the monotonous line of decisions in favor of the landlords
was broken.
Although from 1913 through 1934 about 20 million acres of land had
been distributed, yet ninety-five per cent of all farm land was in
holdings of over 250 acres (i.e., sufficiently large to require
several outside laborers). 55 per cent was in holdings of over 25,000
acres each.
During the five years of the Cardenas incumbency more peasants have
received land than in all the previous years put together and the per
capita share has been almost twice as large. From 1915 through 1934,
20 million acres had been distributed. From 1935 through 1938, nearly
40 million acres. From 1915 through 1934, 759,000 heads of peasant
families had received land. From 1935 through 1938, 813,000. It has
been estimated that by the end of 1938, 41 per cent of the arable land
had been turned over to ejidos. And the process has been continuing
since.
To sustain these moves Cardenas has set up a new institution, The
National Bank of Ejido Credit, with branches in the chief agricultural
regions.
There is a new Agrarian Department, a large part of whose duties
consists in care and advice for ejidos. The members of this department
flow from the newly established agricultural schools.
The Irrigation Commission is in process of revitalization and has
borne fruit already in the great Laguna cotton growing region where
the Palmito Dam has been constructed.
Furthermore, since 1935 the majority of new ejidos have been set up
in collective form and on a bookkeeping basis. Moreover they have been
set up in precisely those regions where collective agriculture can be
most effective, namely, the regions of the great commercial crops
cotton, rice, hemp and wheat. A beginning has also been made in sugar
cane and bananas. By the end of 1939 about one-third of all ejidos
were in collective form, and they controlled the majority of Mexico's
chief cash and export crops.
Though, as before stated, these gains are due chiefly to the revival
of the labor movement and its effect upon the whole federal
administration, yet Cardenas has steadfastly refused to allow himself
to become a pawn in the hands of the Marxist labor leaders. He is,
above all, a patriot, a Mexican and true to his Indian heritage.
Here is the man of the centuries, defender of the oppressed, champion
of champions. And while he fights the privileged groups of his
homeland and struggles against governmental pressure from abroad, he
must whirl to stamp out the treachery inspired by greed of gain in his
own ranks. He has the brave heart and the sturdy will that seeks
economic freedom for the masses. But he does not know the way.
A presidential election has recently been held in Mexico. The
results, not yet announced, will decide whether the liberal policies
of Cardenas will be followed, or whether the forces of oppression will
once more gain the upper hand. But even if the man of Cardenas' choice
is elected, the hopeless economic maze constructed by the liberal
government is not the solution.
Would that a copy of Progress and Poverty were put in the
hands of Mexico's leaders!
|