Planning for a New World Order
Charles Joseph Smith
[Reprinted from Land and Freedom, July-August
1940]
A new world order is being planned by the foes of democracy. It is
now clear if there ever was any doubt of it that the sole guiding
principle in this reconstruction is that might makes right. The
dictators sneer at the weaknesses of the democracies. It would seem
,then, that we should gain their respect by adopting a policy of
firmness. Ironic indeed, therefore, are the recent outbursts of
totalitarian temper at our progress according to their own standards
at the embargo of armaments; at our vigorous defense program; at the
recent Pan-American agreement.
A boastful strength of the dictatorships may not be a strength per
se, but only an apparent weakness in the democracies, whose very
nature is tolerant of imperfections. However, in these very
imperfections democracy is far more efficient and progressive than the
rigidly regimented Dictatorships. Democratic nations are of necessity
in a state of flux. They are like clay, capable of being moulded to
suit new needs as they arise. On the other hand, the totalitarian
states have been forcibly cut out of granite. Any further evolution,
any new needs of human beings, aye, any hope for freedom, can only
come through some violent outburst which must shatter the totalitarian
concept. From what we know of the indomitable strength of the human
spirit, is this hard and unmalleable construction so strong? Extreme
hardness is often associated with great brittleness! Let us appreciate
that our "weaknesses" may be our strength, and our
salvation.
However, this may prove in the long run, we are momentarily faced
with a very real and grave situation, with respect to the fearful
onslaught of the dictators. Not the least of our worries is that South
America may be pulled into the orbit of the totalitarians. It is
feared that a trade "invasion" of our Southern neighbors
will be followed by diplomatic representations to entrench the foes of
democracy in the Western hemisphere. Thus will the way be paved for
the establishment of enemy military bases on this side of the
Atlantic.
We are beginning to realize that, to solve this harassing problem,
basic economic relations must be considered. We recognize that the
strength of the dictators in this hemisphere is the promise of doing a
substantial business with our Latin American neighbors. To pull South
America in our direction we must open up our markets for her. To
accomplish this end, we must increase the purchasing power of our
people, and South America must do likewise. But no sane proposal to
effect this has yet been offered. Instead, all sorts of ridiculous
schemes have been suggested. Among them is the proposal to lend money
to the South American countries, to enable them to purchase our
products at prices higher than charged by other nations, thereby
retaining their good will by buying it. Such unnatural schemes must
fail, as they always have failed in the past, whether applied within
or among nations.
Is there any remedy better than the sane and natural one of complete
free trade? We should be willing to accept the full implications of
this. Real free trade means the free exchange of goods between free
and peaceful people, on equal terms. The policy of the United States
has been an endeavor to export goods and insist on payments in gold.
This is manifestly not in accordance with fundamentals. It has served
only to provide us with a useless monopoly of the world's gold, which
we are hoarding under the ground, and also to arouse the resentment of
the other countries. It is this as well as our tariff policy that has
made South Americans wary of our plans. To them the totalitarian bait
of barter without currency seems relatively more promising. If we are
to gain good relations with our Southern neighbors, and the rest of
the world, we must assume, not a mandatory, but a bargaining attitude.
On the other hand it is no violation of the principle of free trade if
we refuse to ship war materials to the States that are now seeking to
destroy freedom.
Speaking of preparedness, we feel that the present defense program of
the United States will bankrupt the country unless we abandon the idea
of supporting it out of taxes on industry and incomes. Such depletion
of our already low earnings will continue to reduce purchasing power
and throw more out of work. That there has been no proposal for
raising the large amount required for an adequate defense system is
illustrated by the low wages offered to those engaged in military
service $21 per month. The present emergency can be met with
comparative ease, if the tremendous sum we need is obtained from a
direct levy on the land values of the nation. This is the only tax
that will not bear upon production in fact, it will increase
production. It is the only source of revenue that will be adequate for
our vast defense program.
|