Review of the book
Real World Economics: Essays On
Imperfect Markets and Fallible Governments
by Christopher Huhne
Ian Barron
[Reprinted from Land & Liberty,
September-October, 1989]
OCCASIONALLY a book comes along that is full of sense, and this Is
one of them, writes lan Barren. Christopher Huhne is economics editor
of The Independent On Sunday, one of the New Wave newspapers
to be launched in Britain.
In his book he eschews dogma and gets down to a hard-headed appraisal
of the facts. As such, this volume becomes one of the starting points
for a reassessment of the economics of the 1990s.
In terms of policies, in the last 30 years the world has had the lot:
from Keynesianism to monetarism to Thatcherism (Reaganism was a
simple-minded variety of the latter).
Today, all bets are off: where do we go from here? Huhne argues that
the Market v Government dichotomy is ludicrous: "No economy can
survive without a measured dollop of both, and the only real question
is the correct field of action for each."
Governments, at the very least, have to lay down the rules within
which markets can operate; but they are, of course, through their
monetary and fiscal policies, also players in the market.
Huhne confronts all the major questions, ranging from the economics
of the Welfare State to the Third World debt; from the crippling
impact of the EEC's agricultural policies to the causes of the mid-80s
consumption boom that has compromised the Thatcher "revolution."
Most noteworthy, however -- because of the neglect which the subject
receives from the pens of other economists -- is Huhne's treatment of
the land market. In six pages he neatly summarises the impact of land
speculation on the affordablllty of housing; the knock-on effects on
the labour market, and the concomitant influence on wage bargaining;
and the quality of life in the derelict inner city.
The correct policy, he points out, is a tax on land values. Tax
buildings, he notes, and you deter investment; tax land, and you
encourage construction. In the light of this fine contribution, it
would be churlish to nit-pick; but it is worth doing so, because the
property tax is a live topic in Britain, and will feature as a major
policy issue in the next general election.
Huhne thinks that the dispersed nature of property rights In land may
be a hindrance to development; that "a critical mass is necessary".
This view, alas, is influenced by the distorted nature of recent urban
history, which is the story of the land speculator.
The finest neighbourhoods evolved and renewed themselves organically,
building by building, site by site - not, usually, on the basis of
large-scale development. The latter strategy was adopted by frustrated
politicians who intervened to rectify the failures not of the market
but of the fiscal system.
If owners had to pay a hefty tax on the rental Income Imputed to
their land, they would constantly recycle their sites In response to
the needs of the community they served -- not on the basis of a
visionary plan, the Inescapable component of the large scale renewal
approach which has led to the creation of soulless housing estates and
windswept business districts.
On the land value tax, which Huhne advocates, there is one minor
error which bears mentioning because it is currently being used by
Labour politicians as an excuse not to adopt site-value rating as the
alternative to the Poll Tax.
Huhne states: "The basis of the tax is the value of the site in
the use allotted to It by the planning authorities ..." Labour's
local government spokesman employs this kind of statement to claim
that property developers would conspire with planners to destroy
communities by the simple expedient of re-zoning land for more
profitable uses.
Well, the Huhne formulation is acceptable if the planners have
correctly judged the needs of users. But if they have not, then it is
not the new planning permission which dictates the amount that would
be paid by the owners of the sites, but rather the market. Or, more
precisely: competition among prospective users sets the level of land
values. The market reveals those prices, and the Inland Revenue
accepts them for tax purposes.
It is to be hoped that Macmillan will publish a paperback edition of
Christopher Huhne's book, so that it may be accessible to a wider
audience.
|