| 
 Is It Twilight or Dawn --for Denmark?
 Johannes L. Bjorner]An article originally published in Criindskyld,
          October 1940. Translated by Grace Isabel Colbron and reprinted from
          Land and Freedom, January-February 1941]
 
 
 For those who enjoy their pessimism and embrace their worries, the
          time we are now living in is a rather good time, and no one should
          prevent them from being as worried as possible provided they keep
          their pessimism for themselves and do not force it on their
          fellow-mortals. But for folks with a more wholesome point of view, it
          is good to look our times right in the eyes, to weigh advantage and
          disadvantage, and try to find some little profit in the accounting.
 
 One thing can be looked on as gain, and that is that we are living in
          a very interesting epoch an epoch that can teach us much.
 
 Most people can now see what many Georgeists prophesied -- that the
          Versailles Treaty was a bad mistake. The new boundaries drawn up in
          Versailles may in some cases have been better than the old ones in
          that they paid more heed to language and ethnographical boundaries,
          and the League of Nations was a step in the right direction. But the
          demand of the Entente Powers (especially France), that the more than
          two thousand miles of new borders should be tariff borders, tore the
          Versailles Peace in tatters. Tariff is war and war always results from
          it. This was one of the causes why Germany, for instance, and also
          England, were cheated in the disarmament issue; but it was the tariff
          which the munitions industry knew how to play as their trump card.
          That is how we can best summarize the position of today. And what now?
 
 The war in Western Europe may be looked upon as over, for the moment.
          But can it not extend itself still further towards the West? Most
          certainly. There is space enough for a Thirty-Years' War for the
          sovereignty of the Atlantic Ocean, and still further but that is
          probably too big a mouthful for the war industries. And the people
          themselves may become weary of the war. The strongest probability is
          that the war will cease in a relatively near future. And then we'll
          have "peace"! Nothing more?
 
 "Peace is not the best thing one could wish for." We should
          not struggle merely to keep peace. There's peace in the churchyard,
          the peace of the grave. Life cannot be supported on peace alone. The
          opposite of war is not merely peace, but co-operation, just as helping
          one another is the opposite to killing one other. Not just peace, but
          free trade, is the true opposite of war. Down with the barriers, then
          which means, down with the tariff!
 
 What are the chances?
 
 After France's collapse the government of Marshal Petain sent out the
          word: "France's recovery will come through a new economic system
          in commerce and agriculture, and industry shall learn to keep itself
          up by the quality of its production." In other words, away with
          Protection ... institute free economy!
 
 And Germany? Alfred Rosenberg, on July 10th, called together the
          foreign press to give them a glimpse of Germany's future economic
          policy. Rosenberg pictured a Europe of independent States but without
          customs frontiers! And as there was some doubt later as to what he
          really had said. Two important dailies, the Berliner
          Bocrsenzcihthy on July 13th, and the Volkischcr Bcobachter
          on July 16th, carried long commentaries on Rosenberg's speech and
          ended with the following words, dealing especially with the North:
 
 
  "Germany does not intend to pull down the Northern
            States, whose rich cultural wealth and historical tradition are
            perhaps nowhere in the world better known than in Germany. Living
            and working together, that is Germany's aim, not destruction of
            historical values." But how much understanding has modern Germany about free trade? That
          is another question. Opinions differ in Germany, differ widely.
          Recently, Germany's plans for a future political ordering of German
          agriculture were announced. The Government seems to see clearly
          regarding the danger of the constant capitalization of ground rents
          and its attendant increase of price and consequent indebtedness of
          land property. But instead of meeting this problem with an effective
          land valuation tax, they are merely instituting any number of new
          regulations, old regulations and the like regulations that are the
          opposite of free trade.
 
 But that is Germany's concern. But they must let the rest of us
          practice free trade.
 
 It is high time that we gather our forces for a forward push. We had
          all the necessary conditions for making Denmark Europe's free port to
          our own advantage and as an instructive example to other countries.
          But we did not do it. Much might have looked better for us, but the
          majority willed it otherwise. Now, we've got our "cold shower."
          Let us hope that it will teach us to open our eyes and come together
          for a new strong policy.
 
 What Lloyd George said in the House of Commons last May was quite
          true that England and France had only themselves to thank for Hitler's
          hard hand over them. And we can say that we have only ourselves to
          thank for much in our public policies.
 
 Much has happened this year which may portend a new healthy popular
          uprising. We have seen the five democratic parties (in Denmark) unite
          in a concerted opposition to reaction. We have seen employers and
          workers unite to avoid future wages disputes. That is an important
          step! And many things point to a new awakening of national life. There
          were the 740,000 people who met on September 1st to sing the Grundtvig
          song. That could not have happened a year ago! And the feeling of
          fellowship that lay over the dedication of the Grundtvig Church on
          September 8th Grundlvig's Church the great work of a faithful disciple
          of Henry George, Architect Jensen Klint ... a landmark to the talent
          of our day. And on the latest occasion, September 26th, our King's
          70th birthday, the wave of homage and fidelity that rolled out toward
          the King had an objective higher than the King's person. It was the 
          cry of a people to Heaven, the cry of a strongly felt national unity.
          "We are Danes and we will always be Danes."
 
 Will the Denmark of Valdemar's day, the Denmark of free trade and of
          the great land reformers, blossom again in a new national Spring
          towards the aim of The Earth for the People?
 
 Does our day mean Twilight or Dawn?
 
 It is Dawn!
 
 
 |