Remembrances of Arthur W. Madsen
Vic Blundell, et al.
[Reprinted from Land & Liberty, 1957]
To those who had the privilege of working closely with Arthur Madsen
he will never he dead, countless happy memories will keep his spirit
with them. I knew him for nearly 50 years and worked closely with him
for the last 30. He was wonderful, never was there anyone so capable
in so many ways. His grasp of the philosophy of Henry George was
profound, he could express it eloquently with tongue and pen. Only
perfect work was good enough for him; authors of papers for the
International Conferences know how much he trimmed and improved their
work. He knew all the technical as well as the legal points in
relation to the practical application of the policy. He was a
completely capable business man and administrator, and withal a jolly
happy fellow, a delightful companion with his wisdom constantly
flowing.
His spirit never wavered. Twice in his career measures were put into
law in Britain against all the forces of en-trenched privilege. Twice
they were repealed. His office was destroyed by bombs in 1941 with the
loss of many valuable records. Many a man would have yielded -- but
not A.W.M. He fought without respite to the very end. ASHLEY MITCHELL,
Yorkshire.
Arthur Madsen was a man of high intellectual accomplishments, a
logical thinker. and a forceful and often moving speaker and writer.
Yet with all his ability and attainments he was a modest man. This is
no idle or unconsidered statement. To those who were closest to him
his humility was his most outstanding and endearing quality. To those
who saw Arthur Madsen only on the public platform or who knew of him
only by his writings in LAND & LIBERTY this may sound paradoxical
for there was no humility in him when he was espousing the cause of
freedom and equal rights-rather the reverse! He would brook no
contradiction of the Georgeist economic analysis and its conclusions.
He would suffer no compromise on principles no matter what the
political issues, the apparent immediate advantages or the pressures
from friend or foe. Battling with the problems that confronted him, he
often sought the opinions and judgment of his colleagues. It can be
said of him what he once said of John Paul, his predecessor: "He
taught us all the virtue of putting our thoughts into the common pool
and of adopting suggestions that might or might not. interfere with
the originality of any piece of writing."
The standards he set for himself were high -- so high that he invited
the charge of being a perfectionist. But if that be a fault then it is
one that the movement will be ever grateful for in the years to come.
Slipshod or inaccurate work was foreign to him; he sought the best
results in all he undertook, irrespective of who contributed to it and
although he claimed the privilege of those who seek advice -- that of
not always taking it-his desire for counsel and consultation with his
colleagues was a very real thing. The finished job was all that
mattered. "A.W.M.", as he was affectionately known by many,
must often in the course of doing battle have given the impression of
a stern disciplinarian. Yet the reverse was true. The welfare of his
staff was always his concern and it was never neglected, no matter how
pressing his work.
His personality has left a deep impression on the movement not only
in London but throughout the world, and his influence will long be
tell amongst those who carry on after him. V.H. BLUNDELL.
During the seven years I knew him, I saw A.W.M. as Mr. Blundell has
portrayed him. Officially he was my "boss": in practice he
was my friend, mentor and a second father, solicitous always for my
personal welfare as he was for that of all fellow Georgeists. He had
the gentleness and modesty that are the hallmarks of the strong and
the supremely able. In private conversation he used revealing
expressions. For instance, often he would laughingly refer to himself
as "Lord Pooh-Bah" because of the many offices he held in
the movement. He spoke of "the sin of preparation" in the
sense that a man or woman newly fired by the Georgeist philosophy
should take up the cudgels immediately without waiting first to become
an accomplished speaker, writer or economist. He had always too much
work to do, habitually doing two days' work in every 24 hours.
Sometimes, when half a dozen jobs needed his immediate attention he
would choose the one which appealed most to him and would then come
along to my room to make his excuses, saying that he was a "lazy
devil" for engaging in " escapism." He was an educated
man from a well-to-do social environment yet the unlettered and the
humble were always at ease in his delightful company, and he sought
and valued their counsel and friendship. Perhaps no more fitting
description can be found than the one he used often when talking of
companions who had predeceased him-- "he was a lovable Single
Taxer." P. R. STUBBINGS.
Arthur Madsen devoted his eminent talents not to the personal gain
that could have been his but to the advancement of supremely important
public ideas: ideas as lofty in aim as logical in conception and
practical to apply. Those who shared his ideas have lost a great
teacher and a generous friend, but we can never lose the influence of
his character about us, making us ashamed of indolence and
despondency, and encouraging us always to that disinterested and often
unpopular labour on which all human improvement ultimately depends. No
life could be more useful than his. FRANK DUPUIS, Dorset.
In A.W.M. I found that kinship in thought and spirit which
strengthened my convictions and rallied my resolution. He was to me,
as a libertarian, one of the few people to whom I could turn when
doubts beset my mind. Many are the times that my heart has been
uplifted, by confirmation from his lips and pen, of the line of action
I was taking. In his quiet and unassuming way he was most
uncompromising when principles were the issue. He knew not the meaning
of the word "expediency" and he was intolerant of
charlatans. STEPHEN MARTIN, Kent.
For myself the loss is tremendous. I had great respect and much
affection for him. Arthur was a man single in his purpose, and that
purpose was Henry George. He had a firmer grasp on the subject than
anyone else in the world that I know of. Besides this he had a
tremendous background about the people and events in the Georgeist
movement that was of constant benefit to the rest of us who constantly
turned to him for counsel. A great man has left us. Miss V.0.
PETERSON, Robert Schalkenbach Foundatiton. New York.
He came to East London about 1903 and returned to Great Britain in
1909 and we have more or less kept in touch with one another through
correspondence for many years. He was a man of many talents and his
passing will be a great loss to the cause. E. J. EVANS, South Africa.
I had a deep affection and respect for Arthur Madsen. He was my last
personal link (except for my friend Eustace Davies) with the stalwarts
of the land values movement; and I am one of the few still surviving
who remember John Paul when he had his little office in Glasgow. I am
sure that Mr. Madsen's high integrity and transparent sincerity have
been of the greatest help to the movement during his many years of
service. Dr. D.G. TAYLOR, Cardiff.
Despite disappointments and setbacks -- and there must be many in
such a movement as ours -- he pressed forward bravely and undismayed
with the work to which he dedicated his great energy and gifts.
EUSTACE DAVIES, Cardiff.
It is not far short of 50 years since I first met him. During that
time he was a good, wise and understanding friend. He proved again and
again that he possessed a wonderful memory and an ice-cold brain on
economic questions that unerringly picked out any fallacy he heard or
read. GEORGE MUSSON, Derby.
Arthur Madsen has had on me -- a relative newcomer to the movement --
a profound, decisive and, I believe, a lifelong influence. He extended
to me a welcoming hand into the movement when I had first looked into
Progress and Poverty. Once I was in he was to me friend, guide and
mentor, never failing to answer or counsel promptly and at length when
I intimated to him my difficulties. RAYMOND CROTTY, Ireland.
I had enjoyed the privilege of his friendship for close upon 50 years
and never failed to appreciate to the full the wide knowledge he
displayed. F. MITCHENER, Eastbourne.
I can still picture him explaining in so simple and straightforward a
manner that we wondered why it needed explaining at all, a problem
which had appeared most complex, and all with such a modesty of speech
as to make one think that you were doing him the favour of asking the
question. Mr. Madsen's clarity of vision and expression, sincerity and
absolute honesty, patient and painstaking devotion to duty have served
our movement better than we know. RICHARD C. CLARKE, Hong Kong.
I have known, liked and respected him for nearly 50 years. R. W.
JENKINS, Sheffield.
In the course of our correspondence Arthur Madsen and I had become
friends . . . his letters were so full of joy and satisfaction that I
really thought that he was in full vigour again as he was when we met
here last year. I was so looking forward to the time when we should
meet again after finishing our task [the German translation of
Progress and Poverty] . . . I am very, very sad and dreary. ERICH
ZINCKE, Hanover.
I have memories of his work dating back longer than most people on
the United Committee. I am afraid that his enthusiasm took him back to
work before he was really able-he had a good life workjng for what he
knew to be the truth. MRS. DAISY CROMPTON, Carlisle.
How many, many friends he has who will mourn his loss. In my trip
around the world a number of years ago I met them everywhere. How they
liked to talk about him and to discuss his views. They were both
readers and students of LAND &
LIBERTY and looked up to him as their most outstanding authority in
that school of thought which he has expounded so ably and
sacrificially for so many years. H. BRONSON COWAN, Ottawa.
He was a splendid man and commanded the affection of all who were
privileged to know him. He did more than anyone else I know to keep
alive a knowledge of great and enduring principles. He did great
service and that will be his monument. W. ALEXANDER, Editor, City
Press," London.
It is nearly 25 years since I first called at United Committee
offices and was cordially received by Arthur Madsen, John Paul and
others. Since then I have had the good luck to meet Mr. Madsen at many
conferences and meetings. I shall always cherish the memory of these,
not least for the able way in which Mr. Madsen directed and organised
them and for his kind attention to everyone. OLE WANG, Norway.
The best tribute that can be paid to Arthur's long years of devoted
service is to carry on the work to the best of our ability. AUSTIN H.
PEAKE, Devon.
Even we who had only a short association with him knew of his
sterling qualities and were conscious of one firm in principle, of
kindness, courtesy and solid worth. Yet I know also that he was not
alone, and that you of the younger generation will worthily carry on
the work he had laid aside. I have tremendous confidence in you all.
W. E. STANDRING, West Australia.
He was a great man. Although his name is not likely to appear in
history books of our times. I feel that he has done more for good in
this world than most whose names will be chroniced. COLIN C. PATON,
Liverpool.
The sad news that the indefatigable organiser of our international
activities, the valiant champion of the Georgeist cause has departed
this world, is overwhelming. All who knew him will mourn his passing
but the fine example he set us will never be forgotten. MAX TOUBEAU.
France.
For very many years I have appreciated his fraternal collaboration,
his personal charm and the skilful manner in which he has promoted the
Henry George cause. A. DAUDE-BANCEL, France.
We hope that in making this brief selection of extracts from the very
many tributes received we shall be pardoned if we appear to be
invidious.
SOME PUBLISHED TRIBUTES
Translated and condensed from VEJEN FREM April 13, newspaper of
Retsforbundet, the Danish Justice Party.
The many friends whom A. W. Madsen had in this country almost
identified the International Union for Land Value Taxation and Free
Trade with him, he having been the secretary for so many years.
The work for Henry George's great political ideas was his dearest
interest and as secretary of the International Union and editor of
LAND & LIBERTY he found an outlet for the energy and warmth with
which those ideas imbued him.
Presidents and vice-presidents in the Union changed but A. W. Madsen
remained as a central figure in the great universal work. He had
during his life voyaged much in the world and through these travels in
connection with the conferences which the Union held in various
countries and the many visitors he received at the office in Great
Smith Street in London, he had personal contact with hundreds of
Georgeists over the whole world, a contact which he maintained through
his legendary large correspondence.
Of course, "Madsen" is not an English name. A. W. Madsen
had his roots in Denmark. His father was born in Holstebro and was a
lieutenant in the Danish Army in 1864. A. W. Madsen himself was born
in England (sic)* and English was his mother tongue but he had built
up an extremely good knowledge of Danish, which he could read with
little difficulty and he was by no means displeased if his Danish
friends wrote to him in Danish.
The many Danes who took part in the International Conference held in
Odense in 1952 (the second held in Denmark) will remember him as the
energetic organizer -- always in the middle of any activity. A fighter
for Henry George's ideas has passed away. He will be missed by his
many friends and he leaves an empty place in this work. S. H.
[*Mr. Madsen was born in Edinburgh, Scotland, on April 6, 1880.]
LORD DOUOLAS OF BARLOCH in The Times, April 13.
Arthur Madsen played a notable part in the agitation which preceded
and followed the introduction of th famous Lloyd George budget in 1909
and in connexion with all the parliamentary and municipal activities
since that time relating to taxation or rating of site values. His
work was distinguished by the strictest devotion to factual accuracy
as well as undeviating adherence to the economic principle upon which
this policy rests. Madsen was a Fellow of the Royal Statistical
Society. His ability as a statistician and economist was displayed in
his book The State as Manufacturer and Trader. This was a searching
examination of the commercial, industrial and fiscal results of state
tobacco monopolies. It demonstrated that the efficiency of these
enterprises, the quality of their products and the yield of public
revenue were all inferior to those achieved under a regime of private
enterprise coupled with state taxation. Most of his writing, however,
was in the monthly journal LAND & LIBERTY of which he was
assistant editor and later editor for many years, and in numerous
pamphlets and articles in other papers. He was also secretary of the
International Union for Land Value Taxation and Free Trade. He made
its office in London a clearing house for information-a task which his
knowledge of languages facilitated-and he conducted an extensive
correspondence on his chosen topic with persons in many countries.
|