A Lesson From the Tennessee Valley Authority
Frank Chodorov
[Reprinted from Land and Freedom, May-June
1938]
Assuming that all those involved in the T.V.A. imbroglio are of
impeccable integrity -- an assumption that to anyone familiar with
politics must seem charitable -- the affair nevertheless indicates the
improbability of governmental efficiency in industry. That this will
be demonstrated factually by the Congressional investigation not even
the Democrats doubt. In fact, if the disclosures prove nothing more
they will be satisfied.
For nobody expects the government to be efficient. The motive that
makes for efficiency - profit -- is absent. To provide against this
absence of sufficient motivation for conscientious effort political
agencies are burdened with divided responsibility, a sort of
self-spying system. Whatever else they may be, politicians are not
fools. They know that patriotic exhaltation is a poor substitute for
profit, especially when even that compensation is subject to the
vagaries of political trade winds. Divided responsibility and
cross-checks are, in fact, provided not only to safeguard public
interest as far as possible, but also to prevent that glorification
which might result in political preferment for the zealous public
servant. Every politician is jealous of every other politician.
Efficiency is the elimination of waste effort in the process of
rendering service. Where exchanges take place in a competition system
the elimination of waste effort is a determining factor. One does not
exchange his services for those of a wastrel because one does not get
as much as he receives from the efficient worker. The "higgling
of the market" determines the value one will give in exchange for
other values. And since we all seek to satisfy desires with the least
effort, we exchange our values with those who give us most in return
that is, with the most efficient worker.
Where monopoly determines values, efficiency is no longer necessary.
The monopolist can demand in exchange for his values more than he
gives, since he is not threatened with competition. Government in
business is, or tends to be, monopolistic in character. Wherever
government has engaged in rendering service, it has invariably
discouraged competition; in fact, the tendency has been to prohibit
competition. The reason is obvious. The efficiency of private
enterprise must result in the government business losing trade.
Monopoly and competition cannot live in the same world.
It is interesting to note that when "hard times" hit us in
1932 the tendency of private business was to reduce prices so that the
nation's reduced income could absorb more merchandise while the
government post office monopoly raised postage rates. Private
ingenuity went to work to keep up exchanges; the government franking
privilege went merrily on.
The "passion for anonymity" that characterizes scientists
finds compensation in the acclaim of fellow-scientists for work
accomplished. The most retiring of students appreciates the
commendation of his peers, and this commendation is his profit-motive.
The knowledge that worthwhile work will result in unstinted and
sincere praise, if nothing else, is the spur that produces his best
effort. Even the satisfaction of individual achievement may in itself
be the price demanded by the researcher, the thinker.
Such considerations cannot however enter into a world of a political
nature. It is true that on rare occasions governmental officials have
worked unsparingly for the public weal. The record of their
disillusionment has not encouraged such action by others. On the other
hand, the improbability of concrete achievement in the atmosphere of
chicanery that is politics, to say nothing of either public or private
acclaim, makes for that lack of interest which produces inefficiency.
When one's job hangs on the whim of a political leader, it is more
important to curry his favor than to do one's job right. In fact, that
is the only way to hold one's job.
That is one lesson for the T.V A. fuss. As the Congressional
linen-washing proceeds much more dirt will become visible to the
public eye.
|