The Goal of Emancipation
Frank Chodorov
[Reprinted from The Freeman, February, 1941]
Lincoln freed the slaves, it was not within his power to make them
free men.
No leader can make men free. There is no external power that can
strike off the shackles with which men, seeking surcease from
struggle, bind themselves. Chattelism is a most welcome manacle, for
it throws the entire responsibility of reality upon the slave owner.
Statism is a less desirable form of bondage because it forces the
slave to share with his rulers the job of making existence possible.
But, whether it is to chattelism or Statism that man flees, the motive
is to find an economic adjustment. So tenacious is the urge to live.
Having found a modus vivendi, man surrounds it with moral, legal and
romantic bulwarks to insure its continuance and, behind these
barricades, to hope for its permanence. Supernatural justification of
the status is supplemented with soporific tradition, and rigidity is
sought in the formalism of law. Life becomes tolerable, even pleasant,
and an infrequent Simon Legree -- a temporary depression, a war, or a
few purges -- are explained away as exceptions to the System,
necessary unpleasantnesses that must be allowed to disturb the
adjustment.
But somehow the unpleasantnesses persist and multiply. Uncontrollable
economic forces seem to deny the validity of the adjustment. Suddenly
this adjustment ceases to provide enough for the masters, leaves less
than existence for the slaves. Bewilderment is followed by unrest, and
unrest, groping for a cause, gives rise to violence. During the
upheaval the master-slave pattern of existence persists (although the
personnel may change) and in the readjustment becomes more strongly
entrenched. Revolutions and wars make for anarchy.
The reason is that men do not know how to be free. They do not know
that the essence of freedom is the enjoyment of one's own production,
that the essence of slavery is the enjoyment of another's production.
Without property, man is not man. He is a mere hewer of wood and
drawer of water if that which he produces is taken from him.
Whether the medium is chattel slavery or taxation by and for a
bureaucracy, man is merely a zoological creature when he is robbed of
his property. And the mechanism by which both forms of slavery --
chattelism and Statism -- are made possible is the monopoly of the
Earth. For that is the source of all production.
This is the lesson of freedom that man must learn before he can be
free. Not that mere enjoyment of his property will unleash his soul,
make possible the dreams of which he is capable, or in itself endow
him with the blueprint of a better world, but that without economic
freedom all else is impossible. It is true that man does not live by
bread alone, but without bread he cannot live.
The lesson of freedom was not included in the Emancipation Act. The
black man, as ignorant as the white, and, because of his complete
adjustment to the chattel economy, less capable of fending for
himself, was merely transferred from a convenient slavery to a very
inconvenient one. And the white abolitionist, fearing a disturbance in
his adjustment in the monopolized world, proceeded immediately by law
and by custom to force the "freed" black into an economic
slavery far less desirable than chattelism. That, in substance, has
been and is the "Negro problem."
And the black and the white (the unconquered red was tranquillized by
being given access to land) will suffer adjustment and readjustment,
poverty and degradation, chaos and war until the lesson of freedom is
learned. Not until private property can be secured hi common knowledge
against tax collector and rent collector will man be free.
|