Pittsburgh Graded Tax
Betty Feidbein
[Reprinted from the Henry George Fellowship News,
Chicago, IL; September, 1936]
The Pittsburgh graded tax law was enacted in 1913 and began to
function January 1,1914. The law provided for the partial exemption
from taxation of improvements upon real estate, with the rate of
exemption increasing at each triennial assessment. This partial
exemption has been effected by fixing from year to year a lesser tax
rate on buildings than that levied upon land. Thus, the tax reduction
on buildings as compared with land was 10% for the years 1914 and 1915
and an additional 10% every third year until the millage on buildings
became 50% of that charged on land.
This consummation occurred in 1925. This law was enacted through the
influence of Mayor William A. Magee in his first term.
The Pittsburgh graded tax law does not involve any discrimination in
treatment of land and buildings insofar as appraising the value for
taxation purposes is concerned. It is entirely a matter of fixing
separate tax rates.
The entire tax revenue for municipal purposes is derived from taxes
upon real estate. There are no taxes levied by the city government on
any form of property or income. There is no loss of revenue through
the graded tax, also no savings to the community as a whole. This law
has no effect upon revenues or expenditures but merely brings about a
difference in the sources of revenue. Its effect is upon the
respective tax rates on land and buildings which are fixed annually by
the city council at such figures as will produce the sum estimated as
necessary to meet the expenditures set forth in the budget.
Contrary to the opinions of many people, the Pittsburgh graded tax
plan is not the single tax, but is closely related to it.
The effect of the graded tax plan has been to stimulate building and
prevent land inflation. During the years 1914-1920 building permits in
Pittsburgh per 1,000 of increased population were 2,556 over New York
City, 6,656 over Philadelphia and 186 over Detroit. During the years
1922-23-24 there was new construction in Pittsburgh of over one
hundred million dollars, a record never before equalled in the history
of that city. The Pittsburgh Civic Commission in 1912 contended that
high land prices and high land rents were the chief obstacles to
Pittsburgh's progress and a survey at that time indicated that the
average value of land per acre in Pittsburgh as shown by assessments
was second only to that in New York City. Although there is no proof,
it seems certain that the graded tax law has had a tendency toward
lower land prices because land speculation is no longer profitable.
While there has been some dissention regarding the effect of the law
on building and land prices, there is positive proof that the law has
lowered taxes. Two of the largest downtown office buildings show
savings for 1925 of 10% and 15%, respectively, in each instance
savings were in excess of $7,000.00. Two of the newly erected
apartment buildings show savings of 27% and 33%, respectively, on one
case actual savings being over $10,000.00. On the other hand, a number
of manufacturing plants and department stores occupying valuable land
do not show any benefits in lower taxes, but this is offset by savings
due to freedom from taxes on machinery and on personal property. The
chief direct beneficiary is the home owner. For example, in the 13th
ward in 1925, out of 4,252 cases, there were 3,250 cases where the
taxes were less under the new plan. Of the remaining 1,002 where the
taxes were higher under the new system, 980 are vacant lots. The other
22 have not had sufficient improvements to warrant tax reductions. In
1925 the city building tax rate was 35% less than under the old flat
rate system.
The Pittsburgh graded tax plan has been approved by leading firms,
such as H. J. Heinz Co. and Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co., and
endorsed by the Pittsburgh Real Estate Board. The new plan which is
being propounded is to amend the law to reduce buildings and
improvements on land to 1% of the amount levied on land.
|