The Great Enigma of our Times
Henry George
[]
The association of progress with poverty is the great enigma of our
times. The utilization of steam and electricity, the introduction of
improved processes and labour-saving machinery, the greater
subdivision and grander scale of production, the wonderful facility of
exchanges, have multiplied enormously the effectiveness of labour.
It was natural to expect, and it was expected, that labour saving
inventions would lighten the toil and improve the condition of the
labourer; that the enormous increase in the power of producing wealth
would make real poverty a thing of the past.
Could a Franklin or a Priestley have seen in a vision of the future,
the steamship taking the place of the sailing vessel, the railway
train of the wagon, the reaping machine of the scythe, the threshing
machine of the flail; could he have heard the throb of the engines
that in obedience to human will, and for the satisfaction of human
desire, exert a power greater than that of all the men and all the
beasts of burden of the earth combined; could he have seen the forest
tree transformed into finished lumber -- into doors, sashes, blinds,
boxes or barrels, with hardly the touch of a human hand; the great
workshops where boots and shoes are turned out from improved
facilities of exchange and communication -- sheep killed in Australia
eaten fresh in England, and the order given by the London banker in
the afternoon executed in San Francisco in the morning of the same
day; could he have conceived of the hundred thousand improvements
which these only suggest, what would he have inferred as to the social
condition of mankind?
It would not have seemed like an inference. Further than the vision
went it would have seemed as though he saw, and his heart would have
leaped and his nerves would have thrilled, as one who from a height
beholds just ahead of the thirst-stricken caravan the living gleam of
rustling woods and the glint of laughing waters. Plainly, in the sight
of the imagination, he would have beheld those new forces elevating
society from its very foundations, lifting the very poorest above the
possibility of want, exempting the very lowest from anxiety for the
material needs of life. He would have seen those slaves of the lamp of
knowledge taking on themselves the traditional curse, those muscles of
iron and sinews of steel making the poorest labourer's life a holiday,
in which every high quality and noble impulse could have scope to
grow.
And out of those bounteous material conditions he would have seen
arising, as necessary sequences, moral conditions realizing the golden
age of which mankind has always dreamed. Youth no longer stunted and
starved; age no longer harried by avarice; the man with the muck-rake
drinking in the glory of the stars! Foul things fled; discord turned
to harmony! For how could there be greed when all had enough? How
could there be the vice, the crime, the ignorance, the brutality, that
spring from poverty and the fear of poverty, exist where poverty had
vanished? Who should crouch where all were freemen? Who oppress where
all were peers?
More or less, vague or clear, these have been the hopes, these the
dreams born of the improvements which give this wonderful era its
pre-eminence. They have sunk so deeply into the popular mind as
radically to change the currents of thought, to recast creeds and
displace the most fundamental conceptions.
It is true that disappointment has followed disappointment. Discovery
upon discovery and invention after invention have neither lessened the
toil of those who most need respite nor brought plenty to the poor.
But there have been so many things to which it seemed this failure
could be attributed that up to our time the new faith has hardly
weakened. We have better appreciated the difficulties to be overcome,
but not the less trusted that the tendency of the times was to
overcome them.
Now, however, we are coming into collision with facts which there can
be no mistaking. From all parts of the civilized world come complaints
of industrial depression; of labour condemned to involuntary idleness;
of capital massed and wasting; of pecuniary distress among business
men; of want and suffering and anxiety among the working classes.
There is distress where large standing armies are maintained, but
there is also distress where the standing armies are nominal; there is
distress where protective tariffs are applied, but there is also
distress where trade is nearly free; there is distress where
autocratic government yet prevails, but there is also distress where
political power is wholly in the hands of the people; in countries
where paper is money, and in countries where gold and silver are the
only currency. Evidently, beneath all such things as these, from local
circumstances but are in some way or another engendered by progress
itself.
This association of poverty with progress is the great enigma of our
times. It is the central fact from which spring industrial, social,
and political difficulties that perplex the world, and with which
statesmanship, and philanthropy and education grapple in vain. From it
come the clouds that overhang the future of the most progressive and
self-reliant nations. It is the riddle that the Sphinx of Fate puts to
our civilization, which not to answer is to be destroyed. So long as
all the increased wealth which modern progress brings goes but to
build up great fortunes, to increase luxury and make sharper the
contrast between the House of Have and the House of Want, progress is
not real and cannot be permanent.
|