| 
 Putting the Ideas of Henry GeorgeBefore the Public
John Hatherley
 [Reprinted from Land & Liberty, Winter
          2000]
 
 Sir, We must explore another avenue in order to educate the public in
          the ideas of Henry George, an avenue lined with younger trees more
          likely to bear fruit. Education begins with youth. Adult response, as
          we toilers know, results in the response, "Henry George? Who's
          he?" or "No, not him!"
 
 Despite its history in attempting to place LVT on the statue-book in
          the first two decades of the 21st century, the Liberal Party will not
          include it as a policy today.
 
 At a small meeting, I once asked David Steel, "Do you believe in
          land value taxation?"
 
 "Yes, I do," he said.
 
 "Then why don't we ever hear you proposing it?" I responded
          angrily.
 
 He replied, "It's all very well for you to criticise from the
          comfort of your armchair."
 
 I was left speechless. "The comfort of my armchair", in
          those days when I was a Liberal Prospect Parliamentary Candidate, was
          to leave my armchair, in what would otherwise be spare time, and
          spread the word from door to door and in newsletters.
 
 Simon Hughes is a devout Christian and a member of the Progressive
          Forum. He never says a word in favour of LVT.
 
 Perhaps I obtained a clue about Lib-Dem silence at a recent meeting
          at which Charles Kennedy was a speaker. In the question-and answer
          session, I referred to the Liberal Party's historical record in LVT
          and asked why the Lib-Dems do not incorporate it in their manifesto.
          He replied "I represent a farming area in the south west country".
 
 It confirmed what I had long suspected. Several Lib-Dems represent
          areas in the south-west and fear losing parliamentary seats by what
          farmers would regard as an imposition on their land.
 
 In such question-and-answer sessions, one is not given the
          opportunity to reply by pointing out that (a) any tax change might be
          disadvantageous to a minority, but steps can always be taken to remedy
          this; and (b) that fanners would benefit by the consequent reduction
          in income tax and VAT.
 
 But let us return to youth, my youth to start with, in the apartheid
          era in South Africa. During my schooldays, one or two matters started
          to make me wonder about white dominance. The big change came at the
          University of the Witwatersrand in 1943-1947. Anti-apartheid
          demonstrations were held amongst students, several organized by the
          Communist Party.
 
 The academic staff was not pro-Communist, yet strongly
          anti-apartheid. So were the staffs of other English-speaking
          universities such as Cape Town and Natal. They were training the
          future leaders in education, business, the professions, etc. to be
          anti-apartheid.
 
 An important factor occurred in the e 1950s when the theological
          faculty of University of Stellenbosch, an Afrikaner University, turned
          against apartheid. Given the hold the Dutch Reformed Church had
          Afrikaners, this was a major factor.
 
 The point is -- students attend university in order to learn. Their
          minds are not yet set are open. I suggest that this is where we find
          converts to Georgism.
 
 In the current list of Progressive Forum Founder members there are
          seven actually or closely connected economics. I suggest that we ask
          each to promote an essay competition in their institution, offering a
          prize of £50 (or £30 and £20 for 2nd prize) at a cost
          of £5 per essay (to cover the cost of the prize). The essay could
          be subject such as "Henry George's shared an idea for taxation
          with Adam Smith and the Physiocrats: what was it, and what did he do
          to propagate it?" or perhaps better, "Henry George's
          proposed tax became popular in Britain but never became law. Why not?"
          Doubtless others can think of better subjects for the essay. Please
          propose them.
 
 There should not be so many essays impose a strain on each academic
          leader I suggest, should mark the essays and s the prize money in any
          institution.
 
 As regards other universities/colleges, I suggest that heads of the
          relevant faculties be approached, one at a time, essays returned to
          the HGF where someone judge and award prizes. This would avoid a mass
          of work to be judged at one time, entry form should contain an
          invitation to join the HGF.
 
 
 
 
 |