Permanent World Peace is a Long Distance Off
Charles O'Connor Hennessy
[An address delivered at the Henry George Congress,
Chicago, 10 September 1928. Reprinted from Land and Freedom,
Vol. XXVIII, No.5; September-October 1928]
MR. HENNESSY said in part:
Philosophy has been defined as critical and reflective thinking, and
I submit that the promulgation of this Treaty as "a great step
towards universal peace" sufficiently demonstrates the absence of
critical and reflective thinking.
To me the dawn of the era of permanent world peace seems to be a long
distance off, and the impressive event that came off in Paris the
other day I would rate at best only as a gesture. At best it may be
cited as a significant evidence that the political leaders of the
nations have been moved by a rising tide of world opinion to at least
a qualified pledge to put an end to the horrors of war and to the
burdens which the wars of the past and preparations for wars of the
future have laid upon the backs of the workers of the world. We may
even believe that even unaccompanied as it is by a single act that
would give it the spirit of reality, the Briand-Kellogg Treaty is
still to be commended for the good it may do in strengthening the
popular psychology that is everywhere tending away from war.
Behind all the noise and rhetoric and self-deception in which the
world may indulge itself over this Treaty, the fact remains that War
and the preparations for War still remain the greatest industry of the
largest of the so-called civilized nations. In Europe alone, nine
years after the war to end war, the countries that signed this Pact
are raising, by taxation, and spending about two and a quarter billion
dollars annually to maintain the organization of wholesale human
destruction.
To say or think that we can banish war from the world by mere
denunciation or renunciation without an understanding of and a
disposition to remove the fundamental causes of war, is foolishness
and futility. While I do not say or believe that there was hypocrisy
or insincerity fn the spirit moving those who signed the Anti-War Pact
in Paris the other day, I find it hard to believe that some, at least,
of the statesmen who negotiated this Treaty, are not aware of the fact
that the causes of war are economic in their character, and that until
nations are ready to face the realities and deal with the economic
dislocations and iniquities which are at the bottom of the wars
between nations, there will never be assurance of permanent world
peace. Not even disarmament, which so many good people are striving
for, will bring peace to the world, so long as we leave untouched the
causes of poverty among peoples and those encouragements and rewards
to greed and selfishness which breed the fears, the hatreds, and the
jealousies between peoples, that keep alive the spirit of War.
Have we forgotten the great Economic Conference of the League of
Nations at Geneva last year, at which the representatives of fifty-one
countries were called together to find the causes of war and
industrial depression? Reviewing the proceedings of the Conference,
which lasted some weeks, the President, Mr. Theunis, of Belgium,
declared, in effect, that they had uncovered the fundamental source of
Europe's economic misfortunes. The main obstacles to economic revival
were revealed in the hindrances set up by governments to oppose the
free flow of labor, capital and goods.
Where, for example, there had been twenty-one tariff barriers before
the Great War, there are now twenty-eight. So Mr. Theunis concluded:
"The main trouble now is neither in any material
short- age of the resources of Nature nor any inadequacy in man's
power to exploit them. It is all in one form or another a
maladjustment; not an insufficient productive capacity, but a series
of impediments to the full utilization of that capacity."
No statesman in the world has disputed the accuracy of this official
diagnosis made by the International Economic Conference.
The followers of Henry George were not absent from that historic
Economic Conference, for a committee was there representing the
International Union for Land Value Taxation and Free Trade, who
presented a classic memorial to the Conference dealing clearly and
logically with the interdependence of the economic causes of war and
industrial depression. That splendid statement of economic truth is
now, I am happy to say, circulating in ten European languages. I read
the concluding paragraph of it:
"But beneficial as would be the establishment of
Free Trade across national frontiers, it would not suffice to effect
any permanent elevation of the economic status of the ordinary
citizen in any country so long as the evils of land monopoly and the
destructive internal taxation that now restricts the employment both
of capital and of labor remain untouched.
"Both of these evils would disappear if governments could be
led, upon the recommendation of this Economic Conference, to adopt
the policy here advocated. The levy of taxes upon the economic value
of all land apart from improvements would on the one hand immensely
stimulate industry by forcing land into use, and, on the other hand,
would provide a constantly growing source of public revenue, leading
ultimately to the abrogation of the taxes and imposts of various
kinds that in every country so grievously oppress and hamper the
free employment of capital and labor."
And it was the followers of Henry George speaking through their
International Union at the great conference at Copenhagen two years
ago who pointed unerringly to the course that nations must be led to
adopt before world peace can be secured. This is what was said at that
conference:
"We believe that free commerce between the peoples
of the earth would be the greatest civilizing influence that the
world could know. As it would mean the free exchange of goods for
goods, of services for services, it would serve increasingly to
promote those friendly human contacts and understandings that lead
to an ultimate appreciation of the essential kinship of all mankind.
Untaxed and unrestricted trade would put an end to the isolation or
the self-sufficiency of any nation. It would in time bring into
being a league of peoples more potent for peace than any league of
political Governments could be. It would build the straight road to
disarmament of nations by first disarming the minds of their peoples
of the fears, suspicions and antipathies that now naturally grow out
of the selfish national policies that seek to benefit one people by
inflicting injury upon another.
"Finally we propose to end the curse of war, with all its
barbarities and brutalities, and its grievous burdens upon the backs
of the workers of the world by leading nations to recognize and
remove the true causes of international contention and strife. These
have their roots not alone in hostile tariffs and the struggle for
markets, but in the economic imperialism which exploits the natural
resources of distinct and undeveloped lands for the enrichment of
favored groups of capitalists at home."
In closing let me remind you that the followers of Henry George,
citizen of the world, lover of humanity, champion of economic freedom
and social justice, are to gather again next year in the beautiful
city of Edinburgh, in Scotland. The members from many lands of our
International Union for Land Value Taxation and Free Trade are then to
assemble to fittingly celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the
publication of Progress and Poverty, that wonderful book from
which true statesmanship might today learn a way of life for the
nations a way that leads to enduring peace and prosperity for all the
world.
|