| 
 The Correspondence of Thomas JeffersonBy Subject
 BOLINGBROKE / OPINION OF
 You ask my opinion of Lord Bolingbroke and Thomas Paine. They were
          alike in making bitter enemies of the priests and pharisees of their
          day. Both were honest men; both advocates for human liberty. Paine
          wrote for a country which permitted him to push his reasoning to
          whatever length it would go. Lord Bolingbroke in one restrained by a
          constitution, and by public opinion. He was called indeed a tory; but
          his writings prove him a stronger advocate for liberty than any of his
          countrymen, the Whigs of the present day. Irritated by his exile, he
          committed one act unworthy of him, in connecting himself momentarily
          with a prince rejected by his country. But he redeemed that single act
          by his establishment of the principles which proved it to be wrong.
          These two persons differed remarkably in the style of their writing,
          each leaving a model of what is most perfect in both extremes of the
          simple and the sublime. No writer has exceeded Paine in ease and
          familiarity of style, in perspicuity of expression, happiness of
          elucidation, and in simple and unassuming language. In this he may be
          compared with Doctor Franklin; and indeed his
          Common Sense was, for a while, believed to have been written
          by Doctor Franklin, and published under the borrowed name of Paine,
          who had come over with him from England. Lord Bolingbroke's, on the
          other hand, is a style of the highest order. The lofty, rhythmical,
          full-flowing eloquence of Cicero. Periods of just measure, their
          members proportioned, their close full and round. His conceptions,
          too, are bold and strong, his diction copious, polished and commanding
          as his subject. His writings are certainly the finest samples in the
          English language, of the eloquence proper for the Senate. His
          political tracts are safe reading for the most timid religionist, his
          philosophical, for those who are not afraid to trust their reason with
          discussions of right and wrong.
 
 You have asked my opinion of these persons, and, to you, I
          have given it freely. But, remember, that I am old, that I wish not to
          make new enemies, nor to give offense to those who would consider a
          difference of opinion as sufficient ground for unfriendly
          dispositions.
 
 to Francis Eppes, 19 January 1821
 
 
 |