Unemployment and Inflation:
An Unnatural Choice
F. J. Jones
[Reprinted from ESSRA, Autumn, 1974]
IT is being argued by the non-monetarist school that inflation is "endogenous"
and not "exogenous", and consequently beyond the control of
the monetary authorities. But this proposition is untenable if a
proper distinction between money and credit is maintained. Credit is a
bilateral contract between a creditor and a debtor, and no matter how
large the credit, it is always exactly counterbalanced by a debt, so
that the two together can have no effect on the money supply in so far
as they do not increase or decrease the overall monetary pool. Money,
by contrast, is a multilateral contract between the public on the one
hand and the government on the other, and clearly any change in the
quantity of money on the market, has an immediate effect on the value
of the units existing previously, decreasing it if the monetary supply
is expanded and increasing it if it is contracted. If we wish to
maintain the value of our currency, the simple expedient is to stop
printing more of it, and then any increase in credit, profits, bonds,
etc., will prove to be a measure of our increased prosperity. One can
hardly blame people for falling into this error, however, when we find
that the monetary authorities have fallen into it themselves by
replacing the meaningful statistics of the fiduciary issue (actual
note issue from the Bank of England) by the meaningless Ml and M3.
It is argued by others who admit the simplicity of stopping inflation
by no longer resorting to the printing presses, that this is a
political, not an economic, problem, since sound money means
unemployment. The answer to this is that if governments did what was
right rather than what was opportunist, they might bend economists1
minds to devising conditions for sound money and full employment. Too
many economists seem to think that an incompatibility between these
two things is God-given, but the answer to the problem has been known
for at least a hundred years. The natural concomitants of sound money
are free trade and the untaxing of capital and labour, the active
factors in production. With the substitution of an ad valorem tax on
the value of land -- the passive factor, these pressures would force
on to the market the products and natural resources required to
maintain full employment. In the final analysis employment may be
defined as the direct or indirect application of labour to natural
resources (land). Anything that is allowed to stand in the way or to
interfere with this application will cause unemployment.
Both labour and capital have an enduring interest in keeping the
wheels of production turning, so the culprits may be found in those
responsible, directly or indirectly, for oppressive and disincentive
taxation and control, and for allowing artificial barriers to the full
use of land.
|