Land Value Taxation
Kenneth Jupp
[Reprinted from Land & Liberty, Winter,
2000]
What? Another tax! Aren't we taxed enough already? And on land too!
But it will kill the farmers! And who is to do the valuations? There
ate too many expensive bureaucrats already L.V.T can only make things
worse. Thus the man in the pub, misunderstanding the whole concept,
and the three words - Land, Value, and Taxation.
Try again at the college high table or the bench table of an Inn of
Court That s the old Henry George thing. isn't it? Schedule 'A'. One
of the few good things Mrs. Thatcher did was to get rid of that. I've
always put my savings into bricks and mortar. Our London house and
country cottage have increased in value nicely over the years. It'll
be something to leave to our children. L.V.T. wouldn't affect me much
except for the cottage, where we do have a bit of land. You say it's
only the land under the building that is to be taxed? But that's
ridiculous! You can't cut up Realty like that. In any case, the tax
wouldn't bring in very much. It's the bricks and mortar that count.
The truth is that L.V.T. is not selling nowadays.
Land to most people means rural land. Separating real estate into
land and buildings, is foreign to the English language, and to our law
over many centuries (quicquid solo pantatur solo accedit).
Very few appreciate the huge value of land under buildings.
Value suggests a lump sum or price. None would associate it with an
annual payment. The general perception that it is extremely difficult
to value land without the building, although completely false, is
widespread, extending even to a Canadian property assessor (valuer) of
my acquaintance!
Taxation - hateful word. Tax inspectors, tax collectors, and those
who evade, or avoid tax, together with their highly paid consultants
are not popular. Saatchi & Satchi would advise a new brand name.
We should promote the philosophy that taxation needs to be drastically
reduced by finding an alternative revenue for the fiscal needs of
government, without mentioning 'L.V.T.' until someone can think of a
better title.
To make sense of L.V.T. 'land' has to mean the whole material
universe outside of man himself (Progress and Poverty Bk I
chap. 2). It has to cover air space, which is humming with traffic
urgently needing flight paths, radio frequencies, for which competing
mobile-phone companies are paying huge sums of money; and outer space,
which when used to reflect radio waves from spacecraft, is now part of
'land'. The man in the pub will never understand that these are
'land'. The dictionary will persuade the professor that it is absurd,
for he will not find that meaning of land listed in the Shorter Oxford
Dictionary. Confusion is worse confounded by many economists insisting
that the quantity of 'land' is fixed and cannot be increased. In fact
the amount of 'land' in this special sense has constantly expanded in
line with mankind's increasing knowledge of the uses to which the
earth's resources can be put. The simple food-gatherer could only use
those few areas of the planet where the spontaneous produce of the
soil was enough to clothe and feed him all the year round. Today
Mankind uses a vastly extended area of the earth's surface for
agriculture, a large variety of underground minerals for industry, the
air for travel, and cyberspace for communication. Where appropriated
as private property, all these (most notably oil) have given rise to a
crop of millionaires.
The resources of the planet are of no value until their uses are
discovered and people find a need for them. This happens with the
increase of population, and the elaboration of industry and is
accompanied by the growth of the State and of its need for revenue.
The two go together. Thus as Henry George pointed out the value of
these resources is provided by divine foresight to meet the financial
needs of communities. If a revolution in spiritual outlook is required
before that can be accepted, we could, for the present at least, say
that the planets resources are what Nature has provided as public
revenue.
|