The Dangers of Rising Government Debt
J. Rupert Mason
[Reprinted from The Freeman, May, 1939.
Published with the original title, "From Paul to Pay Peter -- The
Dangers of Rising Government Debt"]
Since the advent of the New Deal, a gradual, often unseen, yet none
the less serious shifting of tax load has been accomplished. Directing
and insidiously steering such tax shifting, the land holding lobbyists
have at least played a watchful and important part. The fact that
neither our industrial nor labor leaders have ever publicly called
attention to it, but have seemingly been quite content to complain
about the increased taxes they must now pay, without ever attempting
to find out the reason, is disturbing- those who Know why taxes have
been shifted from land to industry.
The federal government has borrowed for gifts and grants to the
states some 26 billion dollars, under the New Deal; of which 19
billion dollars was outright gift. This is just about the net increase
in the present debt of the national government. Had the federal
government not made this huge present to the states, they would have
been forced to draw at least a part of this sum from land values,
within the states. Instead of this, the states have enacted tax-sale
moratoriums, which operate to prevent the states from even offering
for sale the land which has continued tax delinquent longer than the
period normally allowed by state law for redemption. In California,
for example, the law granted land holders five years to pay their
taxes, before the State could even put the tax defaulted land up for
sale. But, since 1932 the legislature has regularly passed moratoriums
every biennium as "emergency" measures, so that today the
State is still unable to foreclose land on which the taxes lawfully
levied by the counties, cities, etc., have been past due and unpaid
for more than 13 years. In fact, as recently as January 1939, a new
moratorium law unanimously passed the Assembly, and without debate,
while In the Senate the only discussion was by one Senator who wanted
it made even longer!
In view of the fact that the State of California has levied no taxes
upon real property since 1911, and that the taxes levied by most of
the counties, cities, etc., are nominal indeed, when compared to the
taxes on industry and labor products, this complete stoppage of the
foreclosure and sale of tax defaulted land assumes even added
interest. Whereas the cost of schools, roads, etc., was formerly
spread largely against the real estate directly benefitting, such
public works' costs have now largely been assumed by the State, and
sales and gas and income taxes levied to meet them. Yet, California
and other states are solemnly swearing to Washington that they can not
possibly collect more taxes to help meet the relief costs.
If our industrial and labor leaders would only urge the federal
Congress to quit borrowing further money to give to the states, or at
least require the states to repay some reasonable part of funds
advanced, either In money or in sizable tracts of land, which the
holders have allowed to stay tax delinquent longer than the time
allowed by law for redemption, we should soon begin to witness some
democratic, real "pump priming"; that is, more prompt
payment of taxes by dodging land holders. Our ten year depression has
left a vast new frontier on the doorstep of the states for unpaid
taxes. It needs tackling, constructively, and until we are able to
convince the New Dealers that tax-evading and tax-avoiding land
holders must pay the taxes they owe, just as definitely as income or
other taxes, or suffer the consequences, there may be little point in
agitating for heavier taxes upon land values. Whenever I have sought
to discuss this matter with public officials, they think me, radical
indeed when I suggest that the stats laws governing land tenure should
be respected and enforced, and not be changed. They nearly all seem to
have the notion that a land holder should be given as long as he may
want to pay the taxes owing against his land, and if that isn't long
enough, he should then be given still more time.
|