Ayn Rand: A Personal Reappraisal
Sydney A. Mayers
[Reprinted from Fragments, Summer 1995]
It is more than a decade since her demise, and about thirty years
have passed since she reigned majestically as Queen of the
Libertarians. Yet strangely, at this late date, for reasons I cannot
easily fathom, Ayn Rand comes to mind from time to time, and I find
myself cogitating with renewed interest upon her off-beat philosophy,
her unorthodox psychology, and her hard-nosed individualism. I recall
the impact of her personality, the devotion of her disciples, and how
these phenomena led to a cult-like following. But she was maligned as
well as worshiped, and quite intriguingly was the object of widespread
"mixed feelings."
Rand and her concepts were applauded by many in high place -- albeit
often with reservations. Conservatives approved her economics while
deploring her atheism; business leaders praised her espousal of free
enterprise but viewed rather dimly her high industrial standards;
libertarians took delight in her urge for freedom, looking askance,
however, at her deep regard for moral restraint. Her appeal to the
young was enormous, especially those of college age, and, whether it
pleased her or not, there emerged in the Sixties a vast coterie of
eager-to-serve devotees. (I am sure that even today there is a goodly
contingent of believers who continue to wave the banner of
Objectivism.)
It would probably be most interesting to ascertain the current status
of the Ayn Rand "movement" or the extent of her influence on
contemporary thought. Nonetheless I choose not to engage in so broad
an inquiry, but instead, to limit my search to the question of what
Rand hath wrought vis-a-vis this scrivener. After all, she was a
vehement proponent of individualism, and as an adherent of that noble
creed, I deem it my prerogative to be primarily concerned with her
effect upon me.
Biographically and otherwise, she has been roughly treated by some
whilst almost deified by others. My view of both such Rand-bashing and
Rand idolatry is one of disdain. I care naught for reports of the
lady's amorous adventures, however spicy, nor am I carried away by
adulation directed at her person rather than at her ideas. I quite
agree with Albert Jay Nock in the belief that what really matters is
the performance or product of a creative individual, and not his or
her eyebrow-arching peccadillos. So let it be with Ayn Rand. She was
without doubt a unique thinker, of immense intellectual stature, many
(if not all) of whose views are admirable. A wise course herein
clearly is to concentrate on her philosophy, and in so doing,
carefully follow one of her basic principles: never mind the "truth,"
let's get to the facts!
Ayn Rand has moved me intellectually in three ways: by providing
logical support for certain of my pre-formed opinions; by prompting
greater clarity in my thinking, and by offering new insights as to
numerous long-held but somewhat dubious beliefs. She has revealed to
me an intelligent raison d'etre for ideas I had previously
only sensed were valid. All this derives from the mental approach Rand
named Objectivism -- her special word for Reality. She decried the
common tendency (whether political, economic, or social) to create a
sort of dream world, wishfully built upon what might be or should be
or could be, and not what factually exists.
Rand pleaded for reason in all things, for objective consideration of
any and every issue, for determination on the basis of intellectualism
as opposed to emotion, prejudice, or ignorance. She passionately urged
that at all times one should face, recognize, and accept actuality.
She insistently posited that A is A and B is B and neither can ever be
the other; that what is is and what is not is not, and
therefore it is senseless to assert that what does not exist does in
fact exist. To me this comprehensive concept is self-evident, and
represents the purest form of logic.
A major preachment of Rand's was, of course, the Virtue of
Selfishness. Obviously, her concept of the meaning of "selfishness"
is far removed from the generally-held definition of that term. She
stressed what she considered the vast importance of self-esteem and
the transcendental value of one's own talents and accomplishments,
these being the major thrusts of her two best-sellers, Atlas
Shrugged and The Fountainhead. Her point, as I take it,
was simply that not to value oneself is the surest route to being
worthless to others. Which leads, in an oblique way, to another
Randian creation: the non-person, which is merely the bland refusal to
acknowledge the existence of an especially obnoxious person who has
proved unworthy of acceptance as a decent human being. I have found
this delightful expedient a splendid means of obliterating undesirable
acquaintanceships.
I also learned from Rand that rationally any action or statement must
be considered in the context of the prevalent time, place, and
occasion. For example, a happening of today cannot be judged by the
standards of another time, nor can the act of a particular person or
society be assessed by reference to the mores of a different person or
society. Here again can be seen Rand's emphasis on the continuing need
to employ objective reason in connection with just about every human
endeavor.
There are those who, observing her unyielding demand for emotionless,
self-serving rationality in the conduct of human affairs, look upon
Rand as completely cold and calculating, lacking in normal warmth and
tenderness. Even I did, to some extent, but only until I was
privileged to meet and talk with her. (It happened twice, at lectures
given by her then practicing apostle, Nathaniel Branden.) I found her
intense and serious in manner, but at the same time quite outgoing and
responsive. When a group formed, and mention was made of a heinous
crime that had recently been perpetrated, Rand's entire reaction and
demeanor were full of compassion and sympathy for the victim involved.
This was no cold and calculating woman!
|