Abraham Lincoln on the Land Question
Joseph Dana Miller
[Reprinted from Land and Freedom, May-June,
1934]
Charles S. Prizer, a subscriber and well-known Single
Taxer of this city gifted with some imagination, writes us as
follows:
"Your quotation from alleged remarks of
Abraham Lincoln on the land question is the most sensational
news of the year. I wish to believe that the quotation is
authentic but I respectfully ask you to produce proof of its
authenticity. Hundreds of biographers have for many years
prosecuted an unremitting and most intensive search for data
on Lincoln. How is it that a recorded declaration more
important, more fundamental than any other ever made by
Lincoln on any economic question has remained so long
undiscovered and unknown?"
|
TO refresh our readers' minds with the memorable words of Abraham
Lincoln cited in March-April LAND AND FREEDOM we again quote them:
"The land, the earth God gave to man for his home,
sustenance and support, should never be the possession of any man,
corporation, or unfriendly government, any more than air or water,
if as much."
Lincoln saw the land question. He would have dealt with it in the big
way. To him there was no such thing as property in land any more than
in air or water.
He had no doubt of the principle he laid down. Of the method to be
pursued he was not so certain. He said:
"A reform like this will be worked out some time in
the future."
He knew the movement would meet with opposition and he knew the kind
of opposition it would meet. Very forcibly he says:
"The idle talk of idle men that is so common now,
will find its way against it, with whatever force it may possess,
and strongly promoted and carried on as it can be by land
monopolists, grasping landlords, and the titled and untitled
senseless enemies of mankind everywhere."
Thus spoke the Prophet-President!
FOR our authority for these statements of Lincoln we are indebted to
a work in two volumes by Robert H. Browne, M. D., Abraham Lincoln
and the Men of His Time. For the discovery of this remarkable
revelation we are indebted to W.D. Lamb, of Chicago. The work is
little known though it is in the Jersey City library of which the
brother of the editor of LAND AND FREEDOM, Edmund W. Miller, is
librarian.
DR. ROBERT H. BROWNE was born in New York, was an abolitionist
associated with Lovejoy and read law with Davis, Lincoln and Gridley
at Bloomington, Illinois. He was an assistant surgeon in the war of
1861 to its close, and after the war practiced medicine in Kirksville,
Mo. He was a member of the Missouri State Senate 1870 to 1874. We do
not find a record of the date of his death.
LINCOLN was early employed in Danville and Springfield in helping the
settlers in their struggles against the extortions and stealings of
the land sharks. His name was a terror to the infamous crew who as
soon as a settler filed his claim filed counter claims and compelled
the bona fide settlers to yield up a fee to retain their land and thus
save litigation. "I respect," said Lincoln, "the
man who properly named these villains land sharks. They are like the
wretched ghouls who follow a ship and fatten on its offal."
THROUGH this early experience Lincoln was learning the land question.
It is to be remarked, too, that he had more than a merely dim
perception of the evils of land speculation. Because one cannot be a
voluntary beneficiary of an evil institution and maintain the same
attitude toward it, he shrank, with a moral instinct that was a part
of the genius of the man, from direct participation in it. Offered the
opportunity by his friend Gridley, eager to help him, of the purchase
of a quarter section of land, which his friend assured him would
double in value in a year, Lincoln said:
"I am thankful to you and appreciate what you do
for me in so many unselfish ways that no one knows save myself.
Nevertheless, I must decline this kind offer of yours, which would
no doubt profit me and harm no one directly as I view it. I have no
maledictions or criticisms of those who buy, sell and speculate in
land, but I do not believe in it, and I feel for myself that I
should not do it. If I made the investment it would constantly turn
my attention to that kind of business, and so disqualify me from
what seems my calling and success in it, and interfere with the
public or half-public service, which I neither seek nor avoid."
LINCOLN saw the oppression to which the masses of men were everywhere
subjected. That keen brain and tender heart were alive to the
sufferings of mankind due to economic injustice. That he would have
led the movement for the restoration of the rights of men to the earth
they inhabit, and that he would have brushed aside the subtleties of
those who oppose it and gone straight to the heart of the problem, is
clear from what he had to say, and from what we know of the
statesmanlike courage and the peculiar directness of that keen and
penetrating intellect. But the question of chattel slavery lay like a
stone in the way. That removed, the monster of land monopoly was to be
overthrown. And that there may be no doubt of the keeness of his
apprehension of the nature of that struggle, the following words in
connection with what we have already quoted furnish conclusive proof:
"On other questions there is ample room for reform
when the time comes; but now it would be folly to think we could
undertake more than we have on hand. But when slavery is over and
settled, men should never rest content while oppression, wrongs and
iniquities are in force against them."
IT is pleasant to know that the spirit and mind of Lincoln are of us
and with us. He was a man who dealt with elemental things. He saw the
land question, saw it clearly; he saw the miseries that come from
treating land as unrestrained private property; he would have dealt
summarily with the evil institution, and in this he expected to have
the opposition of the senseless enemies of mankind everywhere.
IT would be a task ungracious to the memory of Lincoln to point out
any shortcomings in his statements on the land question. He was not an
economist. Undoubtedly, when he used the word "possession"
he used it in the sense of "ownership." His practical mind
would readily have seen that any system of land tenure designed to
secure the right of man to the land, which he declared was as much a
right as that to "air and water," must include at the same
time the right of private possession -- security of occupancy. This
requirement the Single Tax, or the taking of the economic rent for
public purposes, insures.
***
In the July-August issue of Land and Freedom, Joseph R.
Carroll of Norfolk, Connecticut, added the following information to
the story of how Lincoln came to his views on the land question:
Whatever Lincoln's own observation of the land problem
in Illinois and elsewhere may have been, the solution was revealed
to him in a book loaned to him by Senator Charles Summer, the great
Massachusetts abolitionist. This book was Patrick Edward Dove's Theory
of Human Progression and Natural Probability of a Reign of Justice,
published in Edinburgh in 1850. So great was Summer's interest in
the idea that he had an American edition of either 10,000 or 30,000
copies printed in Boston.
|