The Henry George Congress
Joseph Dana Miller
[A report on the congress held from 12-14 September,
at the Hotel Pennsylvania, New York, New York]
THE Henry George Congress on September 12, 13, and 14 at the Hotel
Pennsylvania, in this city, has passed, but it will not soon be
forgotten by those fortunate enough to be present. No more successful
convention has been held in this city in many a long year; it was a
brilliant and representative gathering of the faithful from many
states; many of the addresses were of a high order of merit, and some
were eloquently delivered. Practical suggestions for work were offered
In the preparation of the programme all shades of Single Tax opinion
as to methods were represented, and all phases of the great economic
problem as related to our principle received adequate treatment from a
host of speakers.
The high lights were the appearance of Father Huntington in his
priestly robes and his thoughtful and uncompromising presentation of
our great message; the eloquent speech of Frank Stephens at the
banquet; the remarkable paper by Oscar Geiger which fittingly
supplemented, though in different style and manner, the striking
address of Father Huntington; the appearance on the platform of a
youthful and growing figure in the movement, Charles LeBaron Goeller,
who challenged the professors of economics on scientific grounds and
aroused the intense interest of his audience with his illustrative
charts and striking comments thereon; and lastly, the gathering at the
tomb of the Prophet, where Mrs. Anna George deMille was no longer one
of the distinguished figures of the movement but became transfigured
as the little daughter of Henry George, leaning with her hand upon the
stone, an inspiring and appealing figure whose simple manner carried
us back over the lengthening years.
Called to order at 11 A. M. on Monday, the convention chairman,
Joseph Dana Miller, asked Mr. W. E. Macklin to deliver the invocation,
and followed with the opening address, which appears elsewhere. Mr.
Edward Polak, former register of the Bronx, and once president of the
Manhattan Single Tax Club, made the address of welcome, also printed
in this issue, and the programme of the Second Annual Congress of the
Henry George Foundation of America was under way.
George E. Evans, of Pittsburgh, president of the Foundation, said he
felt humbled in the presence of so many of the saints. He was one of
the younger men of the movement; he had become a convert to the Henry
George doctrine only seven years ago. He made a plea for unification
of effort by Single Taxers of all shades of opinion, since after all
their aims were identical.
Mr. P. R. Williams, secretary of the Foundation, gave a brief resume
of the activities of the past year, and thanked those who had come
from distant points to attend the gathering. He thanked the committee
who had cooperated with the officers of the Foundation, and referred
gratefully to the aid rendered by the members of the Schalkenbach
Foundation, the Commonwealth Land party and other groups, in making
this conference the success it promised to be.
Miss Charlotte O. Schetter presided at the Monday noon luncheon. The
diners listened to an address of Rev. S. G. Inman from South America,
who said he felt as if he could address his hearers as "dear
friends." He was privileged to be with us owing to his friendship
with Dr. Macklin, of whose idealism he spoke in eloquent terms. Not
long before he had stood on the spot where the rulers of the Incas
once reigned, and he told how the land system of the Incas had been
overthrown by the empire of their conquerors. Referring to Mexico he
said Mexico had four cardinal sins, oil, copper, gold and silver, and
there is a great evangelistic movement to rescue her from these sins.
Hon. George H. Duncan, member of the New Hampshire Legislature,
secretary of the New Hampshire Special Recess Tax Commission, and
field lecturer for the Henry George Lecture Association of Chicago,
spoke in part as follows, his subject being "Practical Progress
in Rational Taxation:"
Rational Taxation has made greater progress than most of us realize.
If we search closely we shall find that in almost every state there is
in operation some statute recognizing the principle that land and not
improvements is benefited by community expenditure, that products of
labor are restricted by taxation, or that natural resources are the
property of the community and not of the individual. Sometimes these
laws have been brought about by followers of Henry George and
sometimes by sheer common sense. In the first class come the
generally-accepted special improvement taxes; in the second that
partial exemption of buildings and full exemption of machinery and
stocks-in-trade in Pittsburgh; and in the third the Minnesota ore-tax.
If we will each seek out in our own community these examples and at
every opportunity point out in a reasonable and friendly manner to
those with whom we are associated their justice, it seems fair to
expect that extensions of these principles will come quite rapidly.
Economic pressure is a strong re-inforcer of true reform. We have
known ever since we understood the Single Tax the unfortunate effect
of the so-called general property tax. When community expenses were
small, this effect was negligible. The recent tremendous increase in
public expenses has accentuated this unfortunate effect, and the
public generally is crying out blindly against the effect, without
knowing the cause. So again, if we wisely stress the truth at every
opportune time, we shall foster progress.
Above all, if we, each in his own way, are doing all we can for the
cause we should not be discouraged if progress seems slow. The child
must creep before it walks and the body politic, like the human body,
cannot safely assimilate too large doses of even the correct medicine.
The fifty years since Henry George wrote
Progress and Poverty are but a short span in the history of
MONDAY AFTERNOON SESSION
Carl D. Smith, of Pittsburgh, introduced Chas. H. Ingersoll as
chairman of this session, who said he would confine himself to
introducing Hon. George L. Record, of New Jersey. Mr. Record's
address, which will be printed in next issue, aroused considerable
discussion, in which Messrs. Stephens, Geiger, Polak and others took
part. Mr. Record replied spiritedly to criticism and was followed by
Mr. P. R. Williams, who explained the graded tax law of Pittsburgh and
Scranton. Mr. Williams discussed the question with great candor,
pointing out that it was in no wise the Single Tax but nevertheless
furnished a good talking point.
Mr. Frank Stirlith followed with an account of the new Delaware
campaign for the graded tax law in Wilmington. In the discussion that
followed Messrs. Fraser, Pleydell, Williams, Macklin, DuBois and
others took part.
Alfred N. Chandler spoke of the taxation work of the Merchants and
Manufacturers League of New Jersey.
The public meeting on the evening of Monday is reported elsewhere,
and the speeches given nearly verbatim.
Bolton Hall spoke on the subject of "The Ways of the Workers"
and the general discussion was participated in by Frank Stephens,
James F. Morton, Will Atkinson, W. E. Macklin, Grace Isabel Colbron
Rev. James O. S. Huntington spoke on the Single Tax as the first step
toward freedom. Single Tax means opportunity. Opportunity has a close
relation to liberty; if man has not opportunity he cannot realize the
liberty that is necessary to progress. We have reached a period of
standardization. We do things by set rules. We are more and more
hemmed in by laws. The aim of the Single Tax is to liberate, so man
may realize the best that is in him. Speaking further on
standardization Father Huntington said too many men think alike; we
have few out standing personalities. And we are shut out from the real
facts of life. The more and fuller the life of the individual the
greater the life and variety of the community. The speaker dwelt
eloquently on the high motives and lofty ideals of the disciples of
Henry George. Father Huntington was given a rising vote of thanks. At
this session Dr. Mark Milliken and Mr. Powell of Fairhope spoke, and
Grace Isabel Colbron talked on Sex and Economics.
Hon. J. C. Lincoln presided at this session and Benjamin C. Marsh
spoke in part as follows:
American agriculture is a sad and serious illustration of what
happens to farmers when a nation goes wrong on its land policy.
Granting subsidies on farm products, through a protective tariff, or
made operative by a McNary-Haugen bill, or by direct payment from the
Public Treasury advocated by the National Grange, the oldest farm
organization, under the euphemistic title, "export debentures,"
will only postpone a just and workable solution of the land problem
and the adoption of efficient methods of farm production. It will in
the long run mean more suffering for farmers, and particularly for
farm women and children, for it would start another orgy of
speculation in farm lands. New York City and Pittsburgh have partially
exempted improvements from taxation, and their representatives at
least should oppose any national legislation to foster more
speculation in farmlands, until the States pleading with Congress for
subsidies on farm products give proof that they are concerned for
farmers as producers and not as land speculators, by exempting
improvements from taxation, at least in part. Farmers can never
achieve financial independence by being legislated into the special
privilege classes, which they have most vigorously and justly
denounced. It is significant that the strongest plea for farm relief
has come from large landed farmers, and bankers holding frozen
mortgages on farms.
At the same time it should be recognized that the nation has
stimulated the too rapid development of the farm plant and speculation
in farm lands by its land grant, railroad and tariff policies, as
well, we are forced to admit, by cheap credit to farmers. Farmers'
mortgage and short term debt is now probably over fifteen billion
dollars or approximately one-third of the selling price of farm land
If farmers decide to try to get the special privileges they have
hitherto denounced, they will be in even sadder straits than now
because they cannot then effectively fight the special privileges from
which they suffer. If they unite against speculation in land and
credit for city as well as farm, against our present tariff policy,
competitive operation of the railroads, and profiteering in natural
resources, and work for efficiency in farm production, they will at
least suffer less.
In the discussion that followed Messrs. Fraser, Kohler, Edwards and
Miss Schetter and Dr. Macklin took part. This was followed by Oscar H.
Geiger, who read his singularly able paper on "The Philosophy of
Henry George." An advisory vote of those present was passed
suggesting the printing of this essay in pamphlet form.
At this session James Bruce Lindsay spoke, saying that the time for
pussyfooting had gone by and making a plea for the uncompromising
presentation of our doctrines. A short time ago we got 12,000 votes in
Ohio, with just enough money to get our ticket on the ballot and no
money at all for propaganda or campaign expenses! George Lloyd also
spoke and Mrs. Marietta Johnson talked interestingly of her methods of
teaching as followed in her now famous school at Fairhope.
On Tuesday night 112 of the delegates attended the banquet. Frederic
C. Howe presided. Lawson Purdy was the first speaker. He reviewed
something of the history of tax methods in New York. He said he had
had it in mind to speak of the attitude of Single Taxers in Henry
George s time. We have got back of what is essential to the adoption
of our principles. But have we advanced to the same degree on moral
A few years ago we had a housing shortage. He had urged at that time
a tax exemption, but as a measure treating all alike. Did they do
this? They did not. We need, not so much measures to help the people,
as a new birth of freedom.
Anna George deMille said the feeling of responsibility was always
with her, but never more than when she faced an audience such as this.
She had been fortunate in selecting her ancestors. Speaking of the
birthplace of her father now acquired by the Henry George Foundation,
she hoped it would be restored as it was in 1839. She trusted that the
little house would be a shrine, a Mecca, for Single Taxers the world
She described the Henry George Hotel in San Francisco, and pictured
her visit to the spot where
Progress and Poverty was written, in sight of the ships and
sky and sea. And she thought how, as he wrote and rewrote, making from
the "dismal science" a book that is in so great a part a
poem, Henry George must have yearned for the sea and ships he loved so
Joseph McGuinness recited the Calf Path by Sam Walter Foss in his
Mrs. Signe Bjorner, of Copenhagen, who had landed from Europe only a
few hours before, spoke in high praise of Jakob Lange, and with an eye
to some of the differences that had developed in Denmark, said that it
seemed to her well that we should fight over nonessentials if we
agreed on essentials.
President Evans then announced officially the purchase of the little
house on 10th Street, Philadelphia, where Henry George was born.
The speech of Frank Stephens was as eloquent an address as was ever
heard at any Single Tax gathering. The movement is vital and enduring
that can inspire such an address, nor has the day of our orators
departed so long as the Arden apostle is with us. Few present could
have failed to be thrilled by such an appeal.
At this session Mr. M. Van Veen acted as chairman, and it was fitting
that a meeting presided over by our uncompromising radical should have
been the occasion for the noble utterance of Rev. A. W. Littefield,
the appeal for fundamental presentation of our principles from James
Bruce Lindsay and the earnest talk of George Edwards. Mr. Edwards
said: "We have been talking fiscal matters; George wrote of the
vision of a new world. We are talking mechanics; George spoke of the
Kingdom of God on earth." Mr. Geiger commenting on Mr.
Littlefield's address said, "You cannot approach this question by
a cent per cent appeal."
At the luncheon on this day James F. Morton presided, and Hamlin
Garland spoke of the early days of the movement. Poultney Bigelow, who
was to have spoken in the morning on "Henry George and His
Friends," was unable to be present owing to the illness of his
wife, but he sent his beautiful tribute to his old friend, and this
was read by Joseph Dana Miller. It will find place in our next number.
At this session, presided over by Amy Mali Hicks, speeches were made
by Mrs. Christine Ross Barker, George H. Hallett, Jr., and James F.
Morton, whose ad dress was a plea for unification, thus fittingly
closing a three days' convention characterized throughout by a spirit
of earnestness and good feeling on the part of the delegates and a
fine spirit of enthusiasm for future work.
Busses conveyed the delegates who remained to the tomb of the Prophet
in Greenwood and here Hamlin Garland, Will Atkinson, Jakob Lange and
Anna George de Mille made short addresses and William Ryan read part
of the last chapter of "Progress and Poverty." Lawrence
Henry, a veteran of the days of '86 and a member of the United Labor
party at that time, had brought with him the banner carried by him in
the George parade. This he had draped lovingly over the tomb and had
taken his place beside the grave of the man he revered, and stood
there, a lone sentinel, awaiting the arrival of the delegates. In a
few simple and halting words, broken by emotion, he told of the early
days of the United Labor Party and the leader he had followed so
devotedly. It was an unconscious tribute to the man whose mastery of
the human heart, whose ability to command the love of his fellows in
all ranks of life, was as great as his commanding genius, his