The Interest Question
C.H. Nightingale
[Reprinted from
Land and Freedom, July-August 1938]
There are some people who think it is a waste of time to discuss what
is to happen to interest incomes under the Henry George policy. One of
your correspondents regards the discussion between L.D. Beckwith and
Allan C. Thompson as a matter that need concern these two, only.
Nothing, I think, could be farther from the truth. Henry George and
those who have followed him have not been content to merely point to
the remedy for our economic ills, but have been at pains to show the
various effects that would follow the adoption of his plan. Why then
should we not be at equal pains to show what would be the effect on
investments? Supposing that the earnings of the people increased to
such an extent that everyone became a capitalist, with ample funds to
supply his needs; supposing that businesses, large and small, would be
capitalized by those employed within them; and that in consequence
there would be little or no demand for "loans," and that
interest rates would go to zero, would it not be well for us to
enlighten the people accordingly?
There are large numbers who claim that our policy does not go far
enough. They assert that, while we would effectively deal with
landowners we would leave untouched other parasites, e.g., the drawers
of interest; and they ask, "Why not socialize everything and cut
out all parasitism?" These people are electors and we must get
their votes before we can hope to bring in our policy.
I, for one, believe that so long as we preach (with Beckwith) that,
under free conditions, wages will double or treble, and that "interest
and wages rise together," so long will we fail to put our plan
over. I contend, therefore, that it is the utmost importance that we
make up our minds on this point, and the only way we can arrive at a
decision is by free and open discussion. If we decide that interest
(under free conditions) will be eliminated, and can prove this, the
objection that we "do not go far enough" will be completely
answered.
|