Money
V. J. Ralph
[Reprinted from the Australasian Georgist
Quarterly, September, 1984]
Value is the core of economic science noted in every exchange by
measurement in price. What is recorded and the method of recording is
monetary theory, a subject much misunderstood and very controversial.
The emphasis has been on what money does, not what it is. The study of
economics is incomplete without understanding the laws, which in the
relationship of trade, established natural money. Barter is
impracticable beyond a primitive economy but it is an imaginary tool
within which to observe the laws and relationships involved in the
more complex method of the practical reality of all men trading in a
method of half or demi-trades.
Money exists in the relationship of men collectively trading and is
the physical record of this relationship. This is one of obligation
and entitlement recognised commercially between debtors and creditors
and recorded in accountancy as debit and credit.
With delay in the exchange, a barter may be separated into its two
halves or demi-trades identified as the initial demi-trade and the
final demi-trade. In the initial demi-trade the person giving value
has an entitlement and the other an obligation which will be
respectively satisfied and discharged 4n the final demi-trade. If the
parties, ~ending completion of the final demi-trade, saw fit to
evidence their relationship created in the initial demi-trade, by a
note or token of acknowledgment from the person obligated and given to
the person entitled and if by agreement it was acceptable to others,
it would be money. It is evidence of the entitlement as well as the
supporting obligation.
The evidenced entitlement might be passed to others entering the
circle of trade until finally the person obligated satisfies the
entitlement, receiving back his own note for cancellation. This is a
sequence where the obligation is stationary and the entitlement is
transferred but there is another sequence where the entitlement is
stationary and the obligation is transferred. Entitlement is evidenced
and transferred to enable a series of demi-trades between the initial
and final. These are intermediate demi-trades which, in the commercial
world, commanding measures of value, interlocking in numerous circles
of trade, relentlessly seek the satisfaction of the obligation which
created them. In balance they expand and contract in accordance with
the volume of trade and require the service of a banker to keep the
records. In banking where the transfer of obligation is readily
recorded, the obligation may move as readily as the entitlement. By
fraud or irresponsibility, obligation avoided or unduly delayed
destroys the entitlement which it otherwise supports, reducing
proportionately the total of all entitlements in the monetary system.
In an imaginary situation of primitive trading, where only a few
persons are involved, honesty and memory would enable a series of
trades to take place without a note or token of evidence. It should be
seen from this that it is not the note or token that is the money but
the entitlement itself supported by its obligation. From this the
simplest of concepts, the ultimate appers practicable where computers
replace human memory in the so-called cashless society. It is
interesting to note that it is not called the "money-less"
society. The word "cash" depicts coins and notes which are
the token extension of the book-keeping system.
Commodity money, such as gold, is circulated as both evidence of
obligation and entitlement. The evidence of entitlement was no better
than paper money but the obligation involved in parting with it to
command something of equal value was a discipline that made the system
work without the certification of obligation by bankers. The gold
traded or circulated in the obligation circle as a dominant trade to
that of the servant where goods and services themselves exchanged.
The smallest circle of trade is where A, B and C trade aligning
themselves so that each gives to another the valuable desired by the
recipient. In the demi-trades of, A to B, B to C, and C to A, the
fourth demi-trade is not lost as there are in effect two separate
barters which have been simplified. A and B exchanged so that B had
the desired valuable but A received something he did not want. He
traded with C to achieve the desired end. Any number of persons may be
included to expand the example but always there is the underlying
principle established in a simple barter. The entitlement-obligation
relationship of men in trade is the natural law upon which monetary
theory must rest.
In the above example of three, or expanded to any number, an example
of commodity money is seen. At the final demi-trade a valuable such as
rum or tobacco is consumed. Coined precious metal circulated until
manipulation confiscated it to the benefit of the State.
Credit money, as already explained, is the logical extension of a
monetary system and is demonstrated again in the circle of trade
between A, B and C or as extended to any number. In the initial
demi-trade (A to B), A was entitled. The entitlement, whether
evidenced or not, drew the valuable from C who became entitled to
receive from B. In the final demi-trade, B discharged his obligation
created in the initial demi-trade (i.e. A to B). In the alternate
obligation circle, B, having the obligation, discharged it to C, who
in turn discharged to A. This is not the basis of circulating money
which is the evidence of entitlement.
Minting or printing as a cause of the physical existence of money
must not be confused with the cause of the evidence for which such
physical evidence is produced. Like anything produced its real value
is that of human service involved, which in the case of printed money
is fractional and unrelated to the value it commands. The value
commanded is supported by corresponding obligation and the strength of
the obligation is the ultimate strength of a monetary system.
|