Taxing Land Values
Thomas G. Shearman
[Excerpted from testimony before the U.S. House Ways
and Means
Subcommittee on Internal Revenue, 16 October 1893]
There is a vast source of income, other than these, and that
is, a similar tax upon the landlords of the country. I am interested
in all these different things, in land, bonds, and stock. Therefore, I
am arguing against my own interest, from a selfish point of view. But
the time has come for taking broad views of these questions.
The possession of land in this country must, in my judgment,
always remain a matter of private property. I believe that landlords
serve a public purpose, and I, for one, have no desire to abolish
landlords. They are useful in their proper place. They are instruments
which nature has provided to raise revenue, and they ought to be made
to subserve public use. You must remember that we do not propose to
absorb all or any large part of the rent of land. It is only a
question of absorbing, at the most, one-twentieth part of it, perhaps
only one-fortieth. You are thinking of taxing everybody on both wealth
and earnings. We ask that all earnings be exempted, and that no one be
taxed except the holders of special and exclusive privileges. We would
tax landlords, railroads, telegraphs, express and transportation
companies, etc., because they are in their nature monopolies, and are
owners of vast privileges of enormous value. You propose to tax them
in any event. All that we propose different from what you would have
in any income-tax law whatever is simply not to tax people who have no
monopolies and no privileges, but are earning, by their own labor,
every dollar that they get. Why tax any man on his earnings, when you
can collect all the revenue you need from a small tax upon special
privileges. People who live upon incomes of this kind are living upon
the taxation of other people. They should be required to contribute
what is reasonable and necessary to the support of the General
Government.
|