.


SCI LIBRARY

The Two-Rate Property Tax in Washington, Pennsylvania

Anthony Spossey


[An address at the annual conference of the Council of Georgist Organizations, held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 29 August, 2001. Reprinted from GroundSwell, 2001]


Former Washington, PA Mayor Anthony Spossey addressed Georgists attending the Council of Georgist Organizations conference near the Pittsburgh airport, at the Aug. 29, 2001 reception, primarily responding to questions. The switch from a one- rate property tax on both land and buildings to a two-rate property tax was made while he was mayor. Though he no longer serves as mayor, Spossey said there has never been any question about continuing with the two-rate property tax. The City of Washington, PA is a third class city, has about 15,000 population, and is the county seat of Washington County.

The following remarks are extracted from Mayor Spossey's presentation at a forum held at Shippensburg, Pennsylvania during 1997:

When I first became Mayor of the City of Washingon in 1983-84 we decided that we had a couple of areas that needed to be addressed. One was the taxable rate on improvements and the other was the assessed values on that property which had become dated. We needed to work with the county in order to update those assessments. So we took over the county assessments and moved them into our city accounts so we were able to have more current assessments. At the same time we'd had some public hearings. I had become aware of the two-rate tax structure and it was very appealing, the fact that we were not going to be penalizing people for renovations and improvements and that the land that the buildings were sitting on was something that should remain stable for all intents and purposes.

At this time Steven Cord (from the Center for The Study of Economics) came in and we began to do some evaluations concerning the effects that this two-rate tax would have on the majority of residents in our city. We have eight wards, we are heavily populated within our wards, and we are landlocked like so many other places in the central business district of the area. ...

We did make the turnover and we did go to the two- rate system. This was done with a public hearing. It worked very well in our favor after our research showed that most of the residents of the City of Washington would benefit by switching from the single-rate to the two-rate system. ...

The improvements not being taxed has contributed vastly to the high incidence of building permits that have been issued in the City of Washington. We have a lot of improvements because they fully realize now that they are not being penalized every time they make some some addition or improvement to their property.

The economic development part of this was also affected. When we switched to the two-rate tax, a large office building in our city which was paying a sizeable tax bill due to the single-rate system was getting ready to appeal that to the tax commission. When we switched to the two-rate tax, their tax payment dropped drastically. Since that date, they have enlarged their facility, they have more tenants as a result, and it is a full building with people actually waiting to move into this structure. I feel a lot of the reason the business stayed there is because of the tax structure we now have in the City of Washington. ...

To conclude, the two-rate tax is not theory, it is in practice. It is a very workable way to get things done if you have a mind to do this.