Letters on Taxation
Letter 3
Edwin Burgess
[1859]
Taxing personal property and offsetting by oath the indebtedness of
the debtor, not only promote perjury, but make it the interest of
those, who own property without indebtedness to leave to the State,
because they, having no indebtedness to offset, will be taxed for all
they own while the debtor who owes for more property than he owns need
pay no tax on personal property whatever, no matter whether the debt
be honestly or dishonestly contracted, whether there is any intention,
or no intention that it shall ever be paid; so that any one who come
to this country having swindled his creditors, or swindles them here,
may be exempt from a personal tax in proportion to the extent of the
swindle. Do we not thus make Wisconsin a profitable Paradise for
rogues, by giving them an annual premium on never paying their just
debts? For if they should become thrifty and saving, pay all they owe
and save as much more, then they will have to pay so much more taxes
every year, in proportion to their industry, honesty, truthfulness,
and economy.
While the land owners of England were the law makers, they taxed
almost everything but the land, to exempt themselves from the payment
of taxes. Now, as we have had laws recently in Wisconsin to delay or
prolong the time of the collection of debts, and now have a law to
exempt the personal property of the debtor from taxation, and thus lay
the burden of the taxes on the industrious and saving, we ought
naturally to inquire into the motive, whether it is a sin or intention
in which they were peculiarly interested, or whether it is a sin of
ignorance from want of considering the consequences. If our
legislators would exempt all personal property from taxes, I would say
Amen. Because then there would be the greatest inducement for industry
and economy, and the tax would then be burdensome to the land
monopolist, who, in consequence of his land monopoly, is the greatest
burden which society has to support. And society is quite as much to
blame as the land monopolist, for it almost literally makes him a
monopolist by making it his interest to be so. And as soon as he
relinquished the land which should belong to others, the land tax
would cease to be burdensome for him. And until land monopoly is
abolished there can be no permanent prosperity for mankind. While one
man owns the land of a landless brother, he, to a certain extent, owns
the labour of the man. If all owned what land they needed to cultivate
by their own labour, they could be self-employing, and would not need
to sell their own labour or produce for less than they could buy that
of others, then we should no longer feel the degradation of "begging
a brother of the earth to give us leave to toil," as Burns
beautifully expresses the dependent condition of the wages slave.
I know one man who will put off building a large house until the
taxes are levied this year, to save the taxes, and thus are builders
kept idle; and can you blame the man when your laws have made it his
interest to do so, especially in a place as tax-ridden as Racine is,
and there are doubtless many in the same condition?
I know one man who loaned money and bought securities here for his
brother who was living in another State; had the brother lived here he
would have had a special tax to pay, but we made it in his interest to
live away and lost his custom, which would help to employ the
unemployed, and diminish our pauper tax; and I had some suspicion that
the buying in the brother's name was only to evade the tax, but shall
we blame the effect in him when the cause is in ourselves, in our
blundering laws which encourage deception and perjury, while producing
pauperism, misery, and crime?
We exempt railroad property from local taxes, and gas property, and
schools, churches, and banks. Now, if it is good in one case, I
challenge any one of you to show that it is not good in all. Then away
with your paltry special privilege legislating, and let us have
instead, laws which, if universally applied, would cause the most
permanent prosperity for all. And though we can never do good to the
taxpayer by taxing him, let us be sure that we do him the least
possible injury. And that, I contend, the "ad valorum" land
tax will do, and no other forced tax whatever, for it is less costly
in valuation and collection, less corruptive and unequal, and causes
less pauperism, misery, and crime than any other tax. In fact it is
the only Free Trade Tax, and sets up no board of inquisition on the
industry of any man or woman.
THE LAY OF THE LANDLESS
No spot I own on all the earth whereon to lay my head;
I have no right by law or might to earn my daily bread.
I'm pauper made for want of trade; my right of land is sold,
Not for a mess of pottage, but for silver and for gold,
By our patriotic office-rogues, who every wrong uphold.
O Land Robber! the land that should be mine,
That lovely land, that fertile land, by legal fraud is thine.
Who gave the rogue a right to sell the land where all should live?
What proof have we in heav'n or earth 'twas theirs to sell or give?
Until they make their title clear, should we uphold their cause;
Nor strive for right with mind and might, and make some better laws;
And in the cause of Truth and Right march on and never pause!
O Land Robber! the land that should be mine,
That lovely land, that fertile land, by legal fraud is thine.
Shall force and fraud forever reign o'er all the sons of man?
We've tried the sword with poor reward, then try the tongue and pen;
Yes! think and act, rely on fact, learn well to know the right,
And do it, too, with action true, sustained by mind and might.
And thus restore to each and all, the land; 'tis theirs by right.
O Land Robber! the land that should be mine,
That lovely land, that fertile land, by legal fraud is thine
INTRODUCTION
Letter 1
* Letter 2
* Letter 3
Letter 4
* Letter 5
* Letter 6
Letter 7
* Letter 8
* Letter 9
Letter 10
* Letter 11
|