| 
          
            | 
              
              Daly, Herman
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Herman Daly is professor of economics in the School of Public
              Affairs, University of Maryland. The following excerpts are from a
              speech delivered 30 April 2002 at the World Bank:
 
 Value added belongs to whoever added it. But the original
              value of that to which further value is added by labor and capital
              should belong to everyone. Scarcity rents to natural services,
              nature's value added, should be the focus of redistributive
              efforts. Rent is by definition a payment in excess of necessary
              supply price, and from the point of market efficiency is the least
              distorting source of public revenue.
 
 Appeals to the generosity of those who have added much value by
              their labor and capital are more legitimate as private charity
              than as a foundation for fairness in public policy. Taxation of
              value added by labor and capital is certainly legitimate. But it
              is both more legitimate and less necessary after we have, as much
              as possible, captured natural resource rents for public revenue.
 
 The above reasoning reflects the basic insight of Henry George,
              extending it from land to natural resources in general.
              Neoclassical economists have greatly obfuscated this simple
              insight by their refusal to recognize the productive contribution
              of nature in providing "that to which value is added".
              In their defense it could be argued that this was so because in
              the past economists considered nature to be non-scarce, but now
              they are beginning to reckon the scarcity of nature and enclose it
              in the market. Let us be glad of this, and encourage it further.
 
 The modern form of the Georgist insight is to tax the resources
              and services of nature (those scarce things left out of both the
              production function and GDP accounts) -- and to use these funds
              for fighting poverty and for financing public goods. Or we could
              simply disburse to the general public the earnings from a trust
              fund created by these rents, as in the Alaska Permanent Fund,
              which is perhaps the best existing institutionalization of the
              Georgist principle. Taking away by taxation the value added by
              individuals from applying their own labor and capital creates
              resentment. Taxing away value that no one added, scarcity rents on
              nature¹s contribution, does not create resentment. In fact,
              failing to tax away the scarcity rents to nature and letting them
              accrue as unearned income to favored individuals has long been a
              primary source of resentment and social conflict.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Darrow, Clarence
 (1859-1938)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Darrow, an attorney in the United States, made his reputation, in
              part, by his defense of a schoolteacher who dared to teach the
              scientific basis for evolution to students in a Southern school.
              Of Henry George, Darrow wrote:
 
 Henry George was one of the real prophets of the world; one of
              the seers of the world. ...His was a wonderful mind; he saw a
              question from every side. ...When we learn that the value or land
              belongs to all of us, then we will be free men -- no need to
              legislate to keep men and women from working themselves to death;
              no need to legislate against the white slave traffic. ...The "single
              tax" is so simple, so fundamental and so easy to carry into
              effect that I have no doubt that it will be about the last land
              reform the world will ever get. People in this world are not often
              logical.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Darrow, Clarence
 | The single tax is so simple, so fundamental, and so easy to
              carry into effect that I have no doubt that it will be about the
              last land reform the world will ever get.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Davenport, Herbert J.
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | It is obvous that the bare land with its contents and the
              waters that flow through and about it constitute the
              nature-provided environment of human beings and are rightly the
              subject of their equal claims. Also that the value-for-use of
              these natural resources is conditioned on population. It follows
              populaton as its shadow. It appears with the people and disappears
              when they go. This value, therefore, should, by the best of
              titles, be retained by the community as its most excellent source
              of public revenue. The more the community draws upon this vast,
              community-conditioned fund the less will be the forced
              contributions from labour and capital. this means that the greater
              and better distributed wil be the purchasing power of the people..
 
 
 [H.J. Davenport, Professor of
              Economics, Cornell University]
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Day, Alan
 (Professor)
 | It is arguable that the whole of the rent of land, or
              alternatively, of the capitalised value of rents, could be taxed
              away and yet the community would not suffer. In this respect land
              is different from the other factors of production.
 
 
 [From comments made at a Colloquium on
              Land Values held in London, March, 1965. Professor Day taught at
              the London School of Economics from 1949 to. 1983. ]
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Deakin, Alfred
 (1857-1919)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | The whole of the people have the right to the ownership of
              land and the right to share in the value of land itslef, though
              not to share in the fruits of land which properly belong to the
              individuals by whose labour they are produced.
 
 
  [Australian Prime Minister] |  
          
            | 
              
              Dewey, John
 (1859-1952)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Dewey is considered to have possessed one of the great minds of
              the twentieth century. His ideas regarding education were and are
              controversial, if often misrepresented by opponents. In the early
              1930s, Dewey became the first honorary president of the Henry
              George School of Social Science in New York City. His attachment
              to the ideas of Henry George was life-long:
 
 Henry George is one of the great names among the world's
              social philosophers. It would require less than the fingers of the
              two hands to enumerate those who, from Plato down, rank with him.
              ... No man, no graduate of a higher educational institution has a
              right to regard himself as educated in social thought unless he
              has some firsthand acquaintance with the theoretical contribution
              of this great American thinker.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Douglas, Paul
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | We ask only that the men and women who make up society should
              be allowed to share in the increases in value which their presence
              and productivity have created. Unless there is such a public
              awareness and commitment, we shall repeat the history of the past
              and permit those who sit tight and hold on to a scarce factor of
              production to reap a large part of the product created by others.
              We are becoming properly aware of the need for land reform in the
              countrysides of Asia and Latin America. There is an even greater
              need for land reform in the cities and suburbs all over the world
              -- our own country included.
 
 
  [U.S. Senator from Illinois and
              Chairman, U.S. Natinal Commission on Urban Problems, 1968]
              
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Dove, Patrick Edward
 | Patrick Edward Dove, a Scotchman, was the most remarkable
              anticipator of Henry George. In 1850 he published anonomously The
              Theory of Human Progression, and Natural Probability of a Reign of
              Justice. This is a diffuse work largely taken up with
              philosophical and theologial specualation; economic problems
              hardly seem to be the main issue. However, Dove referred to the
              land question as "the main question of England's welfare."
 
 How comes it that, notwithstanding man's vast achievements,
              his wonderful efforts of mechanical ingenuity, and the amazing
              productions of his skill, ... a large portion of the population is
              reduce to pauperism? ...To charge the poverty of man on God, is to
              blaspheme the Creator. ...He has given enough, abundance, more
              than sufficient; and if man has not enough, we must look to the
              mode in which God's gifts have been distributed.
 
 
 [from: The Theory of Human
              Progression, pp. 322, 320, 387]
 Dove diagnosed the cause of poverty as the denial of the natural
              right of all to the land of their birth, "the alienation of
              the soil form the state, and the consequent taxation of the
              industry of the country."
 
 Dove believed that the actual division of the land, even if
              possible, would be futile as a remedy. The solution was to be
              found in "the division of its annual value or rent,"
              which could best be done "by taking the whole of the taxes
              out of the rents of the soil, and thereby abolishing all other
              kinds of taxation whatever." If this were done "all
              industry would be absolutely emancipated from every burden, and
              every man would reap such natural reward as his skill, industry,
              or enterprise rendered legitimately his, according to the natural
              law of free competition."
 
 "The rent of any one portion of soil does not depend on
              the labour or capital that has been expended on that portion.
              ...For instance, if, in the heart of London, a space of twenty
              acres had been enclosed by a high wall at the time of the Norman
              Conquest, and if no man had ever touched that portion of soil,"
              or even seen it from that time to this, it would, if let by
              auction, produce an enormously high rent."
 
 
 [Patrick Edwrd Dove, Elements of Political Science
              (1854), p. 283]
 "Political economists have insisted much on the small
              matters that affect the value of labour. By far the most important
              is the mode in which the land is distributed. Wherever there is a
              free soil, labour maintains its value. Wherever the soil is in the
              hands of a few proprietors, or tied up by entails, labour
              necessarily undergoes depreciation. In fact, it is the disposition
              of the land that determines the value of labour. If men could get
              the land to labour on, they would manufacture only for a
              remuneration that afforded more profit than God has attached to
              the cultivation of the earth. Where they cannot get the land to
              labour on, they are starved into working for a bare subsistence."
 
 
  [Patrick Edward DOVE, Theory of Human Progression
              (1850), p. 406 n]
 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Dove,Patrick Edward
 | We are fully aware that there exists in the minds of many
              persons a vague apprehension, tht if the present laws relating to
              landed property were to be disturbed, evils of the most malignant
              character would invade the society of Britain. Nothing could be
              more absurd, more puerile, more dastardly. The very same fears
              have prevailed with regard to every other change that has taken
              place.
 
 
  [From: Theory of Human
              Progression (1850), Chap. III., Sec. 3, pp. 294-5 (Edition of
              1895)]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Dove,Patrick Edward
 | The great social problem, then, that cannot fail ere long to
              appear in the arena of European discussion is, "to discover
              such a system as shall secure to every man his exact share of the
              natural advantages which the Creator has provided for the race;
              while, at the same time, he has full opportunity, iwhtout let or
              hindrance, to exercise his skill, industry, and perseverance for
              his own advantage."
 
 
  [From: Theory of Human
              Progression (1850), Chap. III., Sec. 3, p. 305]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Dove,Patrick Edward
 | Let it be observed that when land is taxed, no man is taxed;
              for the land produces, according to the law of the Creator, more
              than the value of the labor expended on it, and on this account
              men are willing to pay a rent for land.
 
 
  [From: Theory of Human
              Progression (1850), Chap. I., Sec. 2, p. 44 (American Edition
              of 1895)]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Downs, Anthony
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Anthony Downs is a Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution and
              member of the HUD Commission on Regulatory Barriers to Affordable
              Housing.
 
 We should make a fuller case for stronger land taxation as a
              means of reducing housing costs.
 
 
 [Source not known]
 There has been too much money flowing into real estate and
              that this excessive cash flow has created many money-driven rather
              than demand-driven markets.
 
 
 [From: "Tax Reform: What About
              Real Estate?," Urban Land, August, 1985, p. 14.]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Downs, Anthony
 and
 Stanley,
 Knighton
 | This seemingly modest reform [a 2-rate building-to-land
              property tax shift] enabled Pittsburgh, Scranton, Harrisburg and a
              dozen smaller cities to keep housing costs down, and renew and
              revive blighted neighborhoods. These activities, in turn, unlocked
              job opportunities. If the District [of Columbia] went to a
              split-rate [2-rate] system, the experience in Pennsylvania cities
              indicates that: (a) homes and apartments on average would enjoy
              lower taxes; (b) owners of vacant lots and blighted buildings
              would pay substantially higher taxes; and (c) poor precincts would
              reap the proportionately greatest reductions.
 
 
 [Washington Post, 24
              September, 1995, p.C.8] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Durning, Alan
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Taxes on income, payroll, property and retail sales discourage
              entrepreneurship, hiring, investment, savings and work ... they
              also encourage sprawl, depletion of natural resources and
              pollution of land, air and water. ...They could be replaced with
              taxes on land values and on actions that pollute, deplete or
              destroy habitat.
 
 
 [From: "This Place on Earth"
              (1996)]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              East, Ronald
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | We have gone wrong on the land question, and everything else
              has gone wrong automatically. I believe that there is no greater
              or more urgent task of leadership for the engineer than to help
              the community to a clear understanding of the simple economic laws
              that govern distribution of benefits from human activities.
 
 
 [The source of the quote is not known.
              SCI believes this comes from Ronald East, who served Australia as
              President of the Institution of Engineers in the 1950s with an
              expertise on water usage]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Eckert, Charles
 | Now, what about tax on land values? We have observed that land
              values are the result of community growth and advancing
              civilization. They do not come into being as a result of the
              activity of any particular individual, but by the activity of all
              the people functioning as a social organism. Therefore, since no
              particular individual is responsible for the origin and growth of
              land values, but are due to the activity of all the people, it is
              clear that the profits issuing from land values belong to all the
              people.
 
 
 [Member of the U.S. House of
              Representatives during the 1930s, and one-time President of the
              Henry George Foundation of America] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              ECONOMISTMAGAZINE
 | By cutting taxes on labour, governments can remove one
              disincentive to join the job market; by cutting taxes on capital,
              one disincentive to save.
 
 But by taxing the use of natural resources -- be they oil, or
              cadium, or the dirt-absorbing capacity of the atmosphere --
              governments can not only pay for lower taxes on labour and saving;
              they can also make markets work better, by ensuring that prices
              reflect the full costs of economic activity.
 
 
 [From: The Economist, May 5,
              1990] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Einstein, Albert
 (1879-1955)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | I have already read Henry George's great book and really
              learnt a great deal from it. Yesterday evening I read with
              admiration -- the address about Moses. Men like Henry George are
              rare, unfortunately. One cannot imagine a more beautiful
              combination of intellectual keenness, artistic form, and fervent
              love of justice. Every line is written as if for our generation.
              The spreading of these works is a really deserving cause, for our
              generation especially has many and important things to learn from
              Henry George.
 
 
 [From: a letter to a Pennsylvania
              women in response to a letter inquiring whether Einstein had read
              Progress and Poverty, 1931. A copy of this letter is
              available in the SCI library]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Eisenhower,Dwight D.
 (1890-1969)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | At the end of the Second World War, Eisenhower held a unique
              vision of the future, one that would ensure both peace and
              prosperity. He asked:
 
 Why the world's resources could not be internationalized,
              since raw materials represented the world's basic needs, they
              should belong to and serve everybody.
 
 
 [From: Blanche Cook. The
              Declassified Eisenhower, 1985, p.229]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Ely, Richard T.
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | One of the factors leading to the confusion which has
              surrounded the taxation of land values is the old theory of
              economic rent. Those who hold this theory regard land income as
              the result of the spontaneous action of nature and land values as
              the consequence of the niggardliness of nature in failing to
              provide an adequate supply of land in relation to man's need for
              it. Economic evoluton has disproved many of the hypotheses on
              which the Richardian theory of rent is based. ...The concept of
              economic relativity must lead us to draw up plans for the taxation
              of land vlaues which will meet the needs of different times and of
              different places.
 
 
 [From: "Taxing Land Values and
              Taxing Building Values," The Annals of The American
              Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. CXLVIII, No.
              237, March, 1930, p.169] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Emerson, Ralph Waldo
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Whilst another man has no land, my title to mine, and your
              title to yours, is at once vitiated.
 
 
 [source not identified]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Emerson,Ralph Waldo
 | As I am born to the earth, so the earth is given to me, what I
              want of it to till and to plant; nor could I without pusillanimity
              omit to claim so much.
 
 
 [From: The Conservative, A
              Lecture delivered at the Masonic Temple, Boston, December 9, 1841]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Emerson,Ralph Waldo
 | Grimly the same spirit (of progress) looks into the law of
              property and accuses men of driving a trade in the great,
              boundless providence which has given the air, the water and the
              land to men to use and not to fence in and monopolize.
 
 
 [From: On the Times (1841)]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Emerson,Ralph Waldo
 | I find this vast net-work, which you call property, extending
              over the whole planet. I cannot occupy the bleakest crag of the
              White Hills or the Allegheny Range, but some man or corporation
              steps up to me to show me that it is his.
 
 
 [From: The Conservative, A Lecture
              delivered at the Masonic Temple, Boston, December 9, 1841]
              
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Emerson,Ralph Waldo
 | Then he says: "If I am born into the earth, where is my
              part? Have the goodness, gentlemen of this world, to show me my
              wood lot, where I may fell my wood, my field where to plant my
              corn, my pleasant ground where to build my cabin." ..."Touch
              any wood or field or house-lot on your peril," cry all the
              gentlemen of this world; "but you may come and work in ours
              for us, and we will give you a peice of bread."
 
 
 [From: The Conservative, A Lecture
              delivered at the Masonic Temple, Boston, December 9, 1841]
              
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Erskine, John
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | I would say that the single tax theories of Henry George have
              always seemed to me unanswerable, and I believe that when we have
              tried other forms of taxation long enough to be convinced of their
              injustice -- and I don't know how many centuries that will take --
              we shall be ready for his simple and convincing ideas.
 
 [John Erskine was a professor of english at Columbia University.
              During the 1920s he introduced a "great books" program,
              writing: If the faculty believed that the boys in college
              ought to be familiar with more than the titles of great books,
              that happy result could be achieved in a new kind of course,
              extending through two years, preferably the junior and senior
              years, and devoted to the simple principle of reading one great
              book a week, and discussing it in a weekly meeting which would
              last two or three hours.]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Evans, George Henry
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | "Evans subscribed to the idea that property rights
              derived their legitimacy from the right of every human being to
              himself and the fruits of his labor. But land was the gift of God,
              not the product of toil. It followed that 'the land should not be
              a matter of traffic, gift, or will' and government's duty to
              preserve natural rights entailed a duty to regulate land tenure
              for the common good. 'If any man has a right on earth, he has a
              right to land enough to raise a habitation on,' Evans wrote in
              1841. 'If he has a right to live, he has a right to land enough
              for his subsistance. Deprive anyone of these rights, and you place
              him at the mercy of those who possess them.' National Reformers
              claimed that the doctrine of natural rights provided both a
              diagnosis and a cure for the crisis of republican government in
              America -- a crisis manifested by 'the haggard, care-worn
              countennace of the daily laborer, the wasting form of the
              overtasked seastress . . . [and] the squalid children trained to
              beggary and deceit.' The surplus of 'white slaves' caused by the
              mechanization of labor meant that working people were rapidly
              losing the autonomy necessary for responsible citizenship. 'By
              restoring his natural right to the soil,' Evans insisted, 'the
              laborer would not be dependent on the employer, and would
              consequently rise to his proper rank in society.' All the people's
              representatives had to do was fix a limit on the amount of land
              any individual might own."
 
 
 [from: p. 172 of Charles McCurdy's
              Anti-Rent Era in New York Politics: 1839-1865]
 
 |  
 
 |