| 
          
            | 
              
              Reeb, Donald
 | Professor of Political Science, State University of New York
              (Albany) Donald Reeb, in a research paper published in 1998 wrote
              [p.9]:
 
 The two-rate or graded tax not only reduces the negative
              effects from taxation on buildings, it promotes the development of
              new buildings and jobs.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Ricardo, David
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | David Ricardo, whose theories of value and wages furnished the
              economic groundwork for Lasalle and Karl Marx, developed also the
              doctrine of rent which became the cardinal principle in the system
              of Henry George. It is one of the ironies of history that the
              theories of Ricardo, who was such a staunch exponent of the
              interests of the moneyed classes, should have been employed to
              justify radical attacks upon the economic interests of these
              classes.
 
 "In a progressive country", argued Ricardo, ...
              "the landlord not only obtains a greater produce, but a
              larger share.". Hence, "the interest of the
              landlord is always opposed to the interest of every other class in
              the community. His situation is never so prosperous as when food
              is scarce and deal."
 
 
 In Ricardo's Manual of Political
              Economy[p. 1xxx], he wrote:
 Sustained by some of the greatest names -- I will say by every
              name of the rist rank in Political Economy from Turgot and Adam
              Smith to Mill -- I hold that the land of a country presents
              conditions which separate it economically from the great mass of
              the other objects of wealth.
 
 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Ricardo, David
 | Rent is that portion of the produce of the earth which is paid
              to the landlord for the use of the original and indestructible
              powers of the soil.
 
 
 [From: Principles of Political
              Economy, Chap. II]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Ricardo, David
 | The interest of the landlord is always opposed to the
              interests of every other class in the community.
 
 
 [source not researched]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Rogers, James Edwin Thorold
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | As a matter of fact, the owner contributes nothing to local
              taxation. Everything is heaped on the occupier. The land would be
              worthless without roads, and the occupier has to construct, widen
              and repair them. It could not be inhabited without proper
              drainage, and the occupier is constrained to construct and pay for
              the works which give an initial value to the ground rent, and,
              after the outlay, enhance it. It could not be occupied without a
              proper supply of water, and the cost of this supply is levied on
              the occupier also. In return for the enormous expenditure paid by
              the tenant for these permanent improvements, he has his rent
              raised on his improvements, and his taxes increased by them.
 
 
 [From: Six Centuries of Work and
              Wages]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Rogers, James Edwin Thorold
 | Every permanent improvement of the soil, every railroad and
              road, every bettering of the general condtion of society, every
              facility given for production, every stimulus supplied to
              consumption, raises rent. The landowner sleeps, but thrives. He
              along, among all the recipients in the distribution of products,
              owes everything to the labor of others, contributes nothing of his
              own. He inherits part of the fruits of present industry, and has
              appropriated the lion's share of accumulated intelligence.
 
 
 [1870]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Rogers, James Edwin Thorold
 | No human being need trouble himself about a landlord's rents,
              other to be sure than the landlord himself. The happiest state
              which the human race could conceive its such a mobility of labor
              and such an extension of the cultivable land and productive
              industry which man gives to cultivable land as to produce that
              plenty in which rent finds no place.
 
 
 [From: Work and Wages, Chap.
              XVI, p. 456]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Rogers, James Edwin Thorold
 | I can easily imagine a great proprietor of ground rents in the
              metropolis calling attention to the habitations of the poor, to
              the evils of overcrowding, and to the scandals which the inquiry
              reveals, while his own income is greatly increased by the causes
              which make house-rent dear in London, and decent lodging hardly
              obtainable by thousands of laborers.
 
 
 [From: Work and Wages, Chap.
              XV, p. 550]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Roosevelt, Franklin D.
 (1882-1945)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | I believe that Henry George was one of the really great
              thinkers produced by our country. I do not go all the way with
              him, but I wish that his writings were better known and more
              clearly understood, for certainly they contain much that would be
              helpful today.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              RooseveltTheodore
 (1858-1919)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Every person who invests in well-selected real estate in a
              growing section of a prosperous community adopts the surest and
              safest method of becoming independent, for real estate is the
              basis of wealth.
 
 
 [Quoted in: William H. Ten Haken, in "Real
              Estate as a Marketable Commodity," The Annals of The
              American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol.
              CXLVIII, No. 237, March, 1930, p.25]
 The burden of taxation should be so shifted as to put the
              weight upon the unearned rise in the value of land itself, rather
              than improvements, the effect being to prevent the undue rise of
              rents.
 
 
 [From: Century Magazine,
              October 1931]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Rousseau,Jean Jacques
 (1712-1778)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Rousseau's observations concerning the State and the competing
              interests of classes within society led him to conclude:
 
 You are undone if you once forget that the fruits of the earth
              belong to us all, and the earth itself to no one.
 
 The following is from Rousseau's "Discussion on Inequality":
 
 The first man, who after enclosing a piece of ground, took it
              into his head to say, "This is mine" and found people
              simple enough to believe him, was the true founder of Civil
              Society. How many crimes, how many wars, how many misfortunes and
              horrors would that man have saved the human species, who pulling
              up the stakes or filling up the ditches, should have cried to his
              fellow! Be sure not to listen to the imposter; you are lost if you
              forget that the fruits of the earth belong equitably to us all,
              and the earth itself to nobody."
 
 
  [Jean Jacques Rousseau, Essay on
              the Origin of Inequality Among Men (1755), Part II., p.1]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Ruskin,John
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | It begins to be asked on many sides how the possessors of the
              land became possessed of it, and why they should still possess it,
              more than you or I.
 
 
 [From: Fors Clavigera, Vol. I,
              Letter 2] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Ruskin,John
 
 
 | Bodies of men and women, then (and much more, as I have said
              before, their souls), must not be bought or sold. Neither must
              land, nor water, nor air, these things being the necessary
              sustenance of men's bodies and souls.
 
 
 [From: Time and Tide, Sec. 150,
              p. 161] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Ruskin,John
 
 
 | These principles the professor [Fawcett] goes on contentedly
              to investigate, never appearing to contemplate for an instant the
              possibility of the first principle of the whole business -- the
              maintenance, by force, of the possession of land obtained by
              force, being ever called in question by any human mind. It is
              nevertheless the nearest task of our day to discover how far
              original theft may be justly encountered by reactionary theft, or
              whether reactionary theft be indeed theft at all; and farther,
              what, excluding either original or corrective theft, are the just
              conditions of the possession of land.
 
 
 [From: Munera Pulveris (1871),
              p.20] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Russell,Bertrand
 (1872-1970)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Russell reached the same conclusions as Henry George had,
              writing:
 
 The mere abolition of rent would not remove injustice, since
              it would confer a capricious advantage upon the occupiers of the
              best sites and the most fertile land. It is necessary that there
              should be rent, but it should be paid to the state or to some body
              which performs public services; or, if the total rental were more
              than is required for such purposes, it might be paid into a common
              fund and divided equally among the population.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Russell, H. Earle
 | Most municipalities in the Transvaal tax land values only.
              City authorities and the people believe the land value tax is
              fairer than taxing both land and improvements. There is no tax on
              machinery or merchandise. This system has been in effect in
              Johannesburg since 1919. It did not cause any business disturbance
              when suddenly enacted and it has given general satisfaction... It
              undoubtedly has helped to replace old buildings with new ones in
              the more central locations.
 
 
  [U.S. Consul General in the Union of South Africa]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Samuelson, Paul
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Neo-Keynesian economist and Nobel Laureate, Paul Samuelson,
              has over several decades in his extensively-used textbook expanded
              on the subject of whether the income (i.e., cash flow) derived
              from controlling locations justly belongs to the individual or
              entity that happens to hold a title deed enforced by government.
              Here, in a not very direct fashion, he suggests that the just
              society requires that locations be leased by society rather than
              sold for private gain:
 
 Our ideal society finds it essential to put a rent on land as
              a way of maximizing the total consumption available to the
              society. ...Pure land rent is in the nature of a "surplus"
              which can be taxed heavily without distorting production
              incentives or efficiency. A land value tax can be called "the
              useful tax on measured land surplus".
 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Samuelson, Paul
 and
 Nordhaus,
 William D.
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | In the text Economics, 16th edition, p.250, the authors
              write:
 
 The striking result is that a tax on rent will lead to no
              distortions or economic inefficiencies. Why not? Because a tax on
              pure economic rent does not change anyone's economic behavior.
              Demanders are unaffected because their price is unchanged. The
              behavior of suppliers is unaffected because the supply of land is
              fixed and cannot react. Hence, the economy operates after the tax
              exactly as it did before the tax--with no distortions or
              inefficiencies arising as a result of the land tax.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Savage,Robert
 
 
 | In the 1870s ideas similar to those expressed by Henry George
              were being heard in Australia. When Henry George was editing the
              San Francisco Post, a copy of a tract written by Robert Savage, of
              the "Land Tenure Reform League of Victoria," came to his
              attention. He published an extract from it in an editorial in the
              Post, 16 April 1874. The author of the tract declared:
 
 The allocation of the rents of the soil to the nation is the
              only possible means by which a just distribution of the created
              wealth can be effected.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Schreinter,Olive
 (1855-1920)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | The doctrine that land can become the private property of one
              is a doctrine morally repugnant to the Bantu. The idea which is
              to-day beginning to haunt Europe, that, as the one possible salve
              for our social wounds and diseases, it might be well if the land
              should become again the property of the nation at large, is no
              ideal to the Bantu, but a realistic actuality. He finds it
              difficult, if not impossible, to reconcile his sense of justice
              with any other form of tenure.
 
 
  [From: Stray Thoughts on South
              Africa, Fortnightly Review (July, 1896), p.6]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Schlesinger,Arthur (Jr.)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | A letter written by Arthur Schlesinger, printed in the New York
              Times, March 27, 1994:
 
 "In his fascinating article on America through Russian
              eyes ('Under Eastern Eyes: What America Meant to the Writers of
              Russia," Feb. 27), David Plante observes that there are 'very
              few' references to America in Tolstoy. Tolstoy reference Mr.
              Plante might have noted struck George Kennan with singular force
              when Mr. Kennan was Ambassador to Moscow.
 
 Watching a dramatization of Tolstoy's 'Resurrection' at the
              Moscow Art theater, the American Ambassador was electrified to
              hear the leading man, looking straight at him, say, 'There is an
              American by the name of George, and with him we are all in
              agreement.' Was this a daring political gestue? Back at the
              embassy, Kennan took down Tolstoy's novel and found that the line
              referred to Henry George, the champion of the single tax on
              unearned increase in land values and an American much admired by
              Tolstoy."
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Schopenhauer 
 
  ENLARGE
 | In the annals of natural history, after herb-eating animals
              had been evolved, it was not long before beasts of prey made their
              appearance, which lived on the flesh of their precursors. In like
              manner, after men have honestly reclaimed the soil necessary for
              the support of a people, by the sweat of their brows, others are
              sure to arrive on the stage, who, instead of making the soil
              productive and living on its produce, prefer to bring their own
              skins to market and stake life, health and freedom on the chanceof
              pouncing upon those who hold possessions which they have fairly
              earned, and of appropriating their fruits.
 
 
  [From: Parerga and Paralipomena
              (1852 ), Vol.II, Sec. 125]
 The difference between serfdom as in Russia, and landownership
              as in England, and particularly between the serf, and the tenant,
              occupier, mortgagor, etc., is more in form than in fact. Whether I
              own the peasant, or the land from which he must obtain his
              nourishment, the bird or its food, the fruit or the tree, is
              practically a matter of small importance.
 
 
  [From: Parerga and Paralipomena
              (1852 ), Vol.II, Sec. 126]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Scott,Walter
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | To such a point have we been brought by an artificial system
              of society, that we must either deny altogether the right of the
              poor to their just proportion of the fruits of the earth, or
              afford them some means of subsistence out of them by the
              institution of positive law.
 
 
  [From: St. Ronan's Well,
              Chap. XXXII, Note G]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Seattle, chief of the Dwamlsh 
 
  ENLARGE
 | In the mid-nineteenth century, the tribe of indigenous people
              called the Dwamlsh found themselves in the path of the
              European-American conquest of North America. Their chief, Seattle,
              attempted peaceful diplomacy with the President what was still a
              Union of sovereign states, the national government of which had
              declared geo-political control over the territory and peoples of
              much of North America. The letter was directed to Franklin Pierce:
 
 How can you buy or sell the sky -- the warmth of the land? The
              idea Is strange to us... Every part of this earth is sacred to us.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Seneca 
 
  ENLARGE
 | 
 From Epistles, XC (near the end):What generation of men was ever happier? In common they
              enjoyed the gifts of nature; she sufficed like a mother to the
              support of all. ... To-day let avarice add field to field, let her
              drive ut her neighbors by purchase or by fraud, let her swell her
              estate to the size of a province, no extension of our boundaries
              will bring us back to the point we started from.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Seward,William H.
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | But there is a higher law than the constitution, which
              regulates out authority over the domain, and devotes it to the
              same noble purpose. The territory is a part of the common heritage
              of mankind, bestowed upon them by the Creator of the Universe.
 
 
  [From a speech in the United States
              Senate, 11 March, 1850]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Shaw,George Bernard
 (1856-1950)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Shaw, another in a long line of controvsial, reform-minded
              figures of the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries, described
              his introduction to Henry George and his ideas:
 
 I went one night quite casually into a hall in London, and I
              heard a man deliver a speech which changed the whole current of my
              life. That man was an American -- Henry George... Well, Henry
              George put me on to the economic tack, and the tack of political
              science. Very shortly afterwards I read Karl Marx, and I read all
              the early political sciences of that time; but It was the
              American, Henry George, who started me. Therefore, as that
              happened at the beginning of my life, I have thought it fitting
              that now at the end of my life... I might come and give here In
              America back a little of that shove that Henry George gave to me.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Shaw,George Bernard
 | "Finally I must insist that the crux of the land question
              is the classical theory of Economic Rent, dubbed by Lassalle the
              Iron Law of Wages. Like the roundness of the Earth, it is
              unfortunately not obvious. It is the pons asinorum of economic
              mathematics. Our politicians cannot draw their conclusions from it
              any more than Shakespeare could draw his from the okapi or the
              axolotl: they simply do not know of its existence. Karl Marx, by
              an absurd reference to it in 'Das Kapital', proved that he did not
              understand it. John Ruskin, after a very promising beginning as an
              economist by his contrast of exchange value swith human values,
              was stopped dead by it. Yet Marx and Ruskin had had more brains
              and keener interest in social questions than three or four million
              average voters. It is the rock on which Liberal Cobdenism has been
              broken and Socialism built in the struggle between plutocracy and
              democracy."
 
 
 From the book, Everybody's Political What's What?,
              1944, p.22:
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Shim, Ki R.
 
 
 | Land value taxation has various advantages: the decrease in
              land speculation, the acceleration of urban development, the
              financial independence of local governments, redressing the fiscal
              diparity between a central city and its suburbs, prevention of
              urban sprawl and more effective use of land, etc. According to the
              Urban Land Institute of Washington, D.C., the land value tax is
              the golden key to urban renewal to the automatic regeneration of
              the city -- and not at public expense.
 
 
 [Professor of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, 1986]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Simon, Herbert
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Assuming that a tax increase is necessary, it is clearly
              preferable to impose the additional cost on land by increasing the
              land tax, rather than to increase the wage tax ... It is the use
              and occupancy of property that creates the need for municipal
              services that appear as the largest item in the budget -- fire and
              police protection, waste removal, and public works. ..[1978]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Simonde de Sismondi,Jean-Charles-Leonard
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | In general, as soon as there is no more vacant land, the
              masters of the soil have a kind of monopoly against the rest of
              the world.
 
 
 [From: New Principles of Political
              Economy (1820), Book III., Chap. 5, p. 202 (Second French
              Edition)] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Sismonde de Sismondi, Jean-Charles-Leonard
 | As proprietors lastly, the whole soil of the cuntry belongs to
              them, and they have sometimes arrogated to themselves the right of
              dismissing the nation from her own abode.
 
 
 [From: "Essay on Landed Property,"
              Political Economy (1847), English Edition, p. 161]
              
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Sismonde de Sismondi, Jean-Charles-Leonard
 | Let the great (land) lords of England take care! ...If once
              they believe that they have no need of the people, the people may
              in their turn think that they have no need of them.
 
 
 [From: "Essay on Landed Property,"
              Political Economy (1847), English Edition, p. 189]
              
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Sismonde de Sismondi, Jean-Charles-Leonard
 | The nature of landed property, invariably limited, whatsoever
              may be the demand of the producers or consumers, gives it the
              power of a monopoly.
 
 
 [From: "Essay on Landed Property,"
              Political Economy (1847), p. 176] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Sismonde de Sismondi, Jean-Charles-Leonard
 | Labor applied to land produces more than it has cost. The
              often debated question of this surplus is an idle question; its
              existence is a fact which is not contested.
 
 
 [From: "Essay on Landed Property,"
              Political Economy (1847), p. 175] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Sloniker, William E.
 
 
 | The tax on buildings punishes all the people who improve their
              property by raising their taxes and rewards those who let their
              property deteriorate or sit vacant.
 
 Taxing land along would remove the disincentive to private
              development and private renewal of our cities and towns.
 
 
  [Professor of Economics, University of Wisconsin/Milwaukee,
              199-] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Smillie, Robert
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Smillie was elected president of the Scottish Miners' Federation
              in 1894. Two years later he played an important role in the
              formation of the Scottish Trade Union Congress. His role was
              recognised when he was elected chairman at its first conference, a
              post he was to hold until 1899. When the First World War ended in
              1918, Smillie was one of the first to call for the Labour Party to
              withdraw from Lloyd George's coalition government.
 
 In 1919 Smillie called for the nationalization and workers'
              control of Britain mines. David Lloyd George responded by setting
              up a Royal Commission under the chairmanship of Lord Sankey. The
              Sankey Royal Commission failed to agree about the solutions to
              these problems, but the majority of the members did support the
              idea of the mines being nationalized. Smillie was furious when
              Lloyd George refused to nationalize the mines and allowed them to
              go back into private ownership.
 
 Smillie had tried several times to enter the House of Commons. He
              was defeated at by-elections in 1895 (Glasgow) and 1901 (N.E.
              Lanarkshire) and at General Elections held in 1906 (Paisley) and
              1910 (Glasgow). Smillie was finally elected MP for Morpeth in the
              1923 General Election. He declined a post in the 1924 Labour
              Government headed by Ramsay MacDonald.
 
 As a result of poor health, Smillie was forced to resign his
              Morpeth seat in 1929. Robert Smillie retired to Dumfries where he
              died on 16th February, 1940.
 
 "Late in life I have realised, what I failed to see in
              the early days, that the root of all our social problems lies in
              the land question. So long as land is withheld from free access to
              men, anxious and willing to utilise Nature's bounty, just so long
              will you have a crowd of men at the factory gate waiting for jobs.
              The key to the anomalies we are all endeavouring to solve is the
              land problem. 
If the atmosphere could have been parcelled
              out and bottled up so that every child that comes into the world
              would only be allowed to breathe on the payment of air-rent, you
              can picture a state of affairs as deplorable, but no less unjust
              and ridiculous, as that obtaining at the present time with your
              private ownership and monopoly of the land."
 
 
 [A statement made at
              Newcastle-under-Lyme, October 1921]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Smith,Adam
 (1720-1790)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | In Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations we find the germs of
              the idea that land rent is peculiarly an unearned and exploitative
              income:
 
 As soon as land becomes private property, the landlord demands
              a share of almost all the produce which the labourer can either
              raise, or collect from it. His rent makes the first deduction from
              the produce of the labour which is employed upon the land. [Book
              1, Ch.8, p.29]
 
 The idea of land rent as an income which, altogether apart from
              any special activity of the land owner, tends to increase
              spontaneously with the progress of society, yielding to its
              recipients a relatively increasing share in the distribution of
              wealth, is also found in the Wealth of Nations [Book I,
              Ch. 11, p.115]:
 
 Every improvement in the circumstances of the society tends
              either directly or indirectly to raise the real rent of land, to
              increase the real wealth of the landlord, his power of purchasing
              the labour, or the produce of the labour of other people.
 
 The real value of the landlord's share, his real command of the
              labour of other people, not only rises with the real value of the
              produce, but the proportion of his share to the whole produce
              rises with it.
 
 Smith then addressed the subject of whether the rent of land
              ought to be taxed [Book 5, Ch.2, pp.380-81:
 
 Both ground-rents and the ordinary rent of land are a species
              of revenue which the owner, in many cases, enjoys without any care
              or attention of his own. Though a part of this revenue should be
              taken from him in order to defray the expenses of the state, no
              discouragement will thereby be given to any sort of industry.
              ...Ground-rents, and the ordinary rnt of land, are therefore,
              perhaps, the species of revenue which can best bear to have a
              peculiar tax imposed upon them.
 
 Ground rents seem in this respect a more proper subject of
              peculiar taxation than even the ordinary rent of land.
              ...Ground-rents, so far as they exceed the ordinary rent of land,
              are altogether owing to the good government of the sovereign.
              ...Nothing can be more reasonable than that a fund which owes its
              existence to the good government of the stae should be taxed
              peculiarly, or should contribute something more than the greater
              part of other funds towards the support of that government.
 
 A tax upon ground-rents would not raise the rent of houses. It
              would fall altogether upon the owner of the ground-rent, who acts
              always as a monopolist and exacts the greatest rent which can be
              got for the use of the ground.
 
 
 [From: Wealth of Nations
              (1776), Book V, Chap. 2, Art.1]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Smith,Adam
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | As soon as the land of any country has all become private
              property, the landlords, like all other men, love to reap where
              they never sowed, and demand a rent even for its naturla produce.
 
 
  [From: Wealth of Nations,
              Book I., Chap. 6]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Smith,Gerrit
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Smith was born in Utica, New York, on 6 March, 1797. After
              graduating at Hamilton College in 1818, he assumed the management
              of his family estate. In the late 1820s he became active in the
              temperance movement, and then became an abolitionist in 1835. In
              1840 he helped to organize the Liberty party. An "Industrial
              Congress" at Philadelphia nominated him for the Presidency in
              1848, and the "Land Reformers" in 1856. In 1840 and in
              1858 he was a candidate for the governorship of New York on an
              anti-slavery platform.
 
 In 1853 he was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives as an
              independent, and issued an address declaring that all men have an
              equal right to the soil; that wars are brutal and unnecessary;
              that slavery could be sanctioned by no constitution, state or
              federal; that free trade is essential to human brotherhood; that
              women should have full political rights; that the Federal
              government and the states should prohibit the liquor traffic
              within their respective jurisdictions; and that government
              officers, so far as practicable, should be elected by direct vote
              of the people. At the end of the first session he resigned his
              seat. After becoming an opponent of land monopoly, he gave
              numerous farms of fifty acres each to indigent families, and also
              attempted to colonize tracts in northern New York State with free
              negroes. He favored a vigorous prosecution of the Civil War, but
              at its close advocated a mild policy toward the late Confederate
              states, declaring that part of the guilt of slavery lay upon the
              North.
 
 His private benefactions were boundless; of his gifts he kept no
              record, but their value is said to have exceeded $8 million.
              Though a man of great wealth his life was one of marked
              simplicity. He died on the 28th of December 1874, while on a visit
              to relatives in New York City.
 
 I admit that there are things in which a man can have absolute
              property, and which without qualification or restriction he can
              buy or sell or bequeath at his pleasure. But I deny that the soil
              is among these things.
 
 
  [From a Speech to the U.S. Congress,
              21 February, 1854. Speeches of Gerrit Smith, p.74]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Smith,Gerrit
 
 
 | The world will be much happier when land monopoly shall cease,
              because manual labor will then be so honorable, because so
              well-nigh universal. It will be happier too, because the wges
              system, with all its attendant degradation and unhappy influences,
              will find but little room in the new and radically changed
              condition of society.
 
 
  [From: Speeches in the U.S.
              Congress (1854), pp.84-5]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Smith,Gerrit
 
 
 | The vacant land belongs to the landless. The simple fact that
              the one is vacant and the other landless is of itself the highest
              proof that they should be allowed to come together. Alas, what a
              crime against nature that they should be kept apart.
 
  [From: Speeches in the U.S.
              Congress (1854), p. 247]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Snell, Henry
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Henry Snell, the son of an agricultural labourer, was born at
              Sutton-on-Trent, Nottinghamshire, in 1865. He was educated at the
              local school until he reached the age of twelve. As an adult, he
              moved to London, where he joined the Mechanics' Institution and
              used the University College reference library. Books that deeply
              influenced him at this time included books The Age of Reason
              by Tom Paine, Progress and Poverty by Henry George and
              Towards Democracy by Edward Carpenter.
 
 In 1894 Snell joined the Fabian Society. He then joined Ramsay
              MacDonald, Graham Wallas, Catherine Glasier and Bruce Glasier in
              travelling around the country giving lecturers on subjects such as
              'Socialism', 'Trade Unionism', 'Co-operation' and 'Economic
              History'.
 
 Snell was also a early member of the Labour Party and made
              several attempts to represent the party in the House of Commons.
              After failing to be elected in Huddersfield in 1910 and 1918 he
              was eventually elected to represent Woolwich in London in the 1922
              General Election. He continued in politics and between 1935 and
              1940 was leader of the Labour Party in the House of Lords. Henry
              Snell died on 21st April 1944.
 
 I was one of the many thousands of young men whose political
              and social views were greatly stimulated by Henry George's famous
              book Progress and Poverty, which, if measured by the breadth and
              the depth of its influence on the thoughtful workmen of the
              eighties, must be considered as one of the greatest political
              documents of that generation.
 
 
  [From: Men Movements and Myself, 1936]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Snowden, Philip
 (1854-1937)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | I heard Henry George just before 'Progress and Poverty' had
              been published, a book which had made a tremendous impression in
              the United States and Great Britain. Henry George was having
              something of a triumphal tour through Scotland. The Scottish
              Radicals had been captured by the theories he had advanced in
              'Progress and Poverty'.
 
 No book every written on the social problem made so many
              converts. Economic facts and theories have never been presented in
              such an attractive way. Although Henry George was not a socialist,
              his book led many of his readers to socialism. Keir Hardie told me
              that it was 'Progress and Poverty' which gave him his first ideas
              of socialism.
 
 Henry George had a very impressive platform style. In appearance
              he was of middle height, well built, had a full, brown beard, and
              would have passed for a Nonconformist minister. His style of
              speaking was conversational, rather than oratorical.
 
 
 [from: An Autobiography, 1934]
              
 Snowden served in the Liberal government of Lloyd George as
              Chancellor of the Exchequer. Concerned over the desperate
              conditions of the 1930s, Snowden campaigned for reform of the tax
              struture. He wrote:
 
 There never was a time when the need was greater than it is
              today for the application of the philosophy and principles of
              Henry George to the economic and political conditions which are
              scourging the whole world. The root cause of the world's economic
              distress is surely obvious to every man who has eyes to see and a
              brain to understand. So long as land is a monopoly, and men are
              denied free access to it to apply their  labor to its uses,
              poverty and unemployment will exist. Permanent Peace can only be
              established when men and nations have realized that natural
              resources should be a common heritage, and used for the good of
              all mankind.
 
 "Until they had abolished landlordism root and branch,
              every other attempt at reform was building upon the sands. Every
              reform not based on common ownership of the land was simply
              subsidising landlordism. Every social reform increased the
              economic rent of land. Therefore, unless they were going to
              continue to waste their efforts by tinkering with social questions
              as in the past, they must concentrate upon this fundamental
              question, to secure the land for the people."
 
 
 [Mr. Philip Snowden, at Memorial
              Hall, London, 24th May 1919 (Land Nationaliser, June
              1919)]
 "We hold the position that the whole economic value of
              land belongs to the community and that no individual has the right
              to appropriate and enjoy what belongs to the community as a whole.
              Let there be no mistake about it. When the Labour Government does
              sit upon those benches it will not deserve to have a second term
              of office unless in the most determined manner it tries to secure
              social wealth for social purposes."
 
 
 [Mr. Philip Snowden, House of
              Commons, 4th July 1923 (on Third Reading of Finance Bill)]
 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Solow, Robert
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | The user of land should not be allowed to acquire rights of
              indefinite duration for single payments. For efficiency, for
              adequate revenue and for justice, every user of land should be
              required to make an annual payment to the local government equal
              to the current rental value of the land that he or she prevents
              others from using.
 
 
 [1987] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Spence,Thomas
 
 
 | Let all the Parishioners unite, take Archdeacon Paley in one
              hand and the Bible in the other, assemble in an adjoining field,
              and after having debated the subject to their own satisfaction,
              enter into a Convention and unanimously agree to a Declaration of
              Rights, in which it is declared that all the land, including
              coal-pits, mines, rivers, etc., belonging to the Parish of Bees,
              now in the possession of Lord Drone, shall on Lady Day, 25th
              March, 18--, become public property, the joint stock and common
              farm, in which every Parishioner shall enjoy an equal
              participation.
 
 
 [From: Land for the Landless
              (1893), p.14]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Spence,Thomas
 
 | Thomas Spence, of Newcastle-on-Tyne, advocated ideas strikingly
              similar to those of Henry George in a lecture before the
              Philosophical Society of Newcastle on 8 November 1775 (for the
              printing of which, wrote Spence, "the society did the Author
              the honour to expel him"). Spence believed in the natural
              right of all men to land. Concerning the private appropriation of
              land, Spence wrote [The Rights of Infants, 1796, p.3]:
 
 For as all the rivers run into the sea, and yet the sea is not
              full, so let there ever so many sources of wealth, let trade,
              foreign and domestic, open all their sluices, yet will no other
              but the landed interest be ultimately the better.
 
 Spence's remedy was "to administer the landed estate of the
              nation as a joint-stock property, in parochial partnerships, by
              dividing the rent" [The Whole Rights of Man, 1796,
              p.11]
 
 There are no tolls or taxes of any kind paid among them, by
              native or foreigner, but the aforesaid rent. The government, poor,
              roads, etc. etc. ... are all maintained by the parishes with the
              rent: on which account all wares, manufactures, allowable trade,
              employments, or actions, are entirely duty-free.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Spencer, Herbert
 (1820-1910)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Herbert Spencer, in his Social Statics, published in
              1850, the same year as Patrick Edward Dove's work, gave the
              fullest exposition of the natural rights theory applied to land
              prior to Henry George's writings. In chapter IX, The Right to the
              Use of the Earth, he declared that "equity ... does not
              permit property in land" [p.132]:
 
 The right of each man to use of the earth, limited only by the
              like rights of his fellow-men, is immediately deducible from the
              law of equal freedom. We see that the maintenance of this right
              necessarily forbids private property in land. On examination, all
              existing titles to such property turn out to be invalid.
 
 Spencer believed that equal apportionment of the earth among its
              inhabitants and common property in land would be alike unfeasible.
              But the change could be effected with no serious disturbance of
              the existing order [p.141]:
 
 The change required would be simply a change of land-lords.
              Separate ownership would merge into the joint-stock ownership of
              the public. Instead of being in the possession of individuals, the
              country would be held by the great corporate body -- Society.
              Instead of leasing his acres form an isolated proprietor, the
              farmer would lease them from the nation. Instead of paying his
              rent to the agent of Sir John or his Grace,  he would pay it to an
              agent or deputy-agent of the community. Stewards would be public
              officials instead of private ones; and tenancy the only land
              tenure.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Spencer, Herbert
 
 
 | Equity ... does not permit property in land. For if one
              portion of the earth's surface may justly become the possessio of
              an individual and may be held by him for his sole use and benefit
              as a thing to which he has an exclusive right, then other portions
              of the earth's surface may be so held; and eventually the whole of
              the earth's surface may be so held; and our planet may thus lapse
              into private hands.
 
 
  [From: Social Statics (1850),
              Chap. IX]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Spencer, Herbert
 | "It may by-and-by be perceived that Equity utters
              dictates to which we have not yet listened ; and men may then
              learn that to deprive others of their rights to the use of the
              earth, is to commit a crime inferior only in wickedness to the
              crime of taking away their lives or personal liberties."
 
 
 [Herbert Spencer, Social Statics
              (1851), IX, 9] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Spencer, Herbert
 
 | "It can never be pretended that the existing titles to
              such property (i.e., land) are legitimate. Should anyone think so,
              let him look in the chronicles. Violence, fraud, the prerogative
              of force, the claims of superior cunning -- these are the sources
              to which these titles may be traced."
 
 
  [Herbert Spencer, Social Statics
              (1851), Chap. IX] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Spencer, Herbert
 
 | "You have turned over the soil to a few inches in depth
              with a spade or a plough; you have scattered over this prepared
              surface a few seeds ; and you have gathered the fruits which the
              sun, rain, and air helped the soil to produce. Just tell me, if
              you please, by what magic have these acts made you sole owner of
              that vast mass of matter, having for its base the surface of your
              estate, and for its apex the centre  of the globe? . . . You say
              truly, when you say that 'whilst they were unreclaimed these lands
              belonged to all men.' And it is my duty to tell you that they
              belong to all men still; and that your ' improvements' as you call
              them, cannot vitiate the claim of all men. You may plough and
              harrow, and sow and reap ; you may turn over the soil as often as
              you like; but all your manipulations will fail to make that soil
              yours, which was not yours to begin with. . . . This extra worth
              which your labour has imparted to it is fairly yours . . . but
              admitting this, is quite a different thing from recognising your
              right to the land itself."
 
 
 [Herbert Spencer, Social Statics,
              1851, ix, 4]
 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Spinoza, Baruch de
 (1632-1677)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Spinoza, the Dutch philosopher, in his Tractatus Politicus
              proposed that the rents of the soil, supplemented perhaps by the
              rents of houses, should defray the expenditures of the state [Ch
              VI, On Monarchy, Sec. 12]:
 
 Let the fields, and the whole soil, and, if it can be managed,
              the houses should be public property, that is, the property of him
              who holds the right of the commonwealth: and let him let them at a
              yearly rent to the citizens, whether townsmen or countrymen, and
              with this exception let them all be free, or exempt from every
              kind of tax in time of peace. And of this rent a part is to be
              applied to the defences of  the state, a part to the king's
              private use.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Stamm,August Theodor
 
 
 | In the late 1880s, A. T. Stamm, who had previously tried to start
              an organization he called "The Society for Humanism,"
              sought to form a society, "The All-Weal Union." These
              efforts came to naught until Michael Flürscheim launched in
              Frankfort the "German Union for Land Ownership Reform."
              It gained 600 members. Their educational efforts convinced
              officials of the imperial government and navy of the usefulness of
              the land value tax for ending land speculation and provided for 16
              years a practical demonstration of that in a large colonial
              territory, Kiaochow, China.
 
 In 1871, Stamm, in Die Erlosung der darbenden Menschheit,
              wrote that private property in land was the cause of nearly all
              human ills. In its abolition was to be found the complete solution
              of the social problem. Collective ownership might be effected in
              several ways, but the best means, Stamm believed, was gradually to
              absorb the rent of land by increasing the land tax. Stamm differed
              from Henry George, however, in holding that, since the original
              wrong of private appropriation of land was not that of the present
              but of previous generations, the rights of present owners should
              receive some consideration.
 
 |  BROWSE BY AUTHOR
 |