| 
          
            | 
              
              MacArthur,Douglas
 (1880-1964)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Inspired by Henry George's reform proposals, MacArthur saw to it
              that during his military governorship of Japan following the
              Second World War that land rent reform was incorporated in the
              writing of the Japanese Constitution. The new constitution
              reversed the portion of agricultural commodities collected as rent
              between owners (whose portion dropped to one-third of the total),
              and the tenants farmers who actually did the work (who were then
              able to retain two-thirds of what they produced).
 
 James Michener, who served as MacArthur's economic adviser,
              repeated this theme in his novel, Hawaii:
 
 No nation can avoid land reform. All it can do is determine
              the course it will take: bloody revolution or taxation.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              MacDonell, John
 | An offer is made of a mode of raising revenue, which takes
              from none what they have rightly earned, which need rob no one of
              what he has rightly bought, and which will replenish the Treasury,
              no man being mulcted, no man wronged; and are we to reject this
              offer and for ever allow so many private interests to gather round
              this public domain that it shall be useless and perverted? ...We
              vex the poor with indirect taxes, we squeeze the rich, we ransack
              heaven and earth to find new impost palatable or tolerable, and
              all the time these hardships are going on; neglected or
              misapplied, there have lain at our feet a multitude of resources
              ample enough for all just common wants, growing as they form
              Nature's budget. Such seems the rationale of the subject of which
              the land question forms a part. And so we may say that, if
              property in land be ever placed on a theoretically perfect basis,
              no private individual will be the recipient of economic rent.
 
 
  [From: The Land Question,]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              MacDonald,Ramsay
 | "Our moral thoughts are usually cast ultimately into a
              theological form, and so the land reformer's case is generally
              opened by a statement like ' the land is God's common gift to
              all.' Cast in its severely economic form, however, the point is
              equally effective. Rent is a toll, not a payment for service. By
              it social values are transferred from social pools into private
              pockets, and it becomes the means of vast economic exploitation. .
              . .Rent is obviously a common resource. Differences of fertility
              and value of site must be equalised by rent, and it ought to go to
              common funds and be spent in the common interest"
 
 
 [Mr. J. Ramsay MacDonald, Socialism,
              Critical and Constructive, p.164]
 "Our old Socialist argument that economic rent must be
              taken by the State, because it is created by circumstances of
              which the whole community is entitled to take advantage, has been
              enormously increased by the results and the experiences of the
              war. And it is fundamental."
 
 
 [Mr. J. Ramsay MacDonald, Socialism
              after the War, p.53]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              MacDonell, John
 | John Macdonell (1845-1921) served from 1901 to 1920 as professor
              of law at University College, London. He was also a distinguished
              jurist. The book, A Survey of Political Economy, based on
              a series of articles published in the Scotsman newspaper.
 
 My apology for essaying, in these circumstances, such a task
              as is implied in the title "A Survey of Political Economy,"
              rests on the possibility of this modest work turning attention to
              others more exhaustive, on the absence of any book conceived on
              the same plan, and on an intense desire ... to see political
              economy divested of many fallacies, not the less false because
              sometimes harsh and degrading.
 
 
  [From: A Survey of Political
              Economy (1871), Edinburgh: Edmonston and Douglas]
 An offer is made of a mode of raising revenue, which takes
              from none what they have rightly earned, which need rob no one of
              what he has rightly bought, and which will replenish the Treasury,
              no man being mulcted, no man wronged; and are we to reject this
              offer and for ever allow so many private interests to gather round
              this public domain that it shall be useless and perverted? ...We
              vex the poor with indirect taxes, we squeeze the rich, we ransack
              heaven and earth to find new impost palatable or tolerable, and
              all the time these hardships are going on; neglected or
              misapplied, there have lain at our feet a multitude of resources
              ample enough for all just common wants, growing as they form
              Nature's budget. Such seems the rationale of the subject of which
              the land question forms a part. And so we may say that, if
              property in land be ever placed on a theoretically perfect basis,
              no private individual will be the recipient of economic rent.
 
 
  [From: The Land Question,
              (1873)]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Mann, Thomas
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | In 1886 I read Henry George's book, Progress and Poverty. This
              was a big event for me; it impressed me as by far the most
              valuable book I had so far read. It enabled me to see more clearly
              the vastness of the social problem, to realize that every country
              was confronted by it.
 
 Henry George's cure for economic problems, as advocated in
              Progress and Poverty is the Singl Tax. I could not accept all
              George's claims on behalf of his proposal, though for lack of
              economic knowledge I was unable to refute these claims.
 
 His book was a fine stimulus to me, full of incentive to noble
              endeavour, imparting much valuable information, throwing light on
              many questions of real importance, and giving me what I wanted --
              a glorious hope for the future of humanity, a firm conviction that
              the social problem could and would be solved. I must again give a
              reminder that Socialism was known only to a few persons, and that
              no Socialist organization existed at that time.
 
 
  [From: Memoirs, 1923]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Manning,Henry E.
 (Cardinal)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | There is a natural and divine law anterior and superior to all
              human and civil law, by which every people has a right to live of
              the fruits of the soil on which they are born and in which they
              are buried.
 
 
  [From a Letter to Earl Grey (1868),
              Miscellanies, Vol.I, p.239]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Marmontel,Jean-Francois
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | The land is a solemn gift which nature has made to man; to be
              born then is for each of us a title of possession. The child has
              no better birthright to the breast of its mother.
 
 
 [From: Address in Favor of the
              Peasants of the North (1757), Euvres, Vol. X, p.56.]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Marmontel,Jean-Francois
 | Hence those immense landed estates which luxury condemns to
              barrenness and which for the gratification of one man deprive a
              population of existence who would otherwise be born to cultivate
              it.
 
 
  [From: Address in Favor of the
              Peasants of the North (1757), Oeuvres, Vol. X, p. 68]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Marti,Jose
 | Jose Marti, the hero of Cuban independence, described Henry
              George as:
 
 ...one of the most cogent and audacious thinkers, ...George's
              book was a revelation not only for the workers, but also for the
              intellectuals. Only Darwin, in the natural sciences, left an
              impression comparable to that of George in the social sciences.
              ...His devotion can be compared to the love of Nazareen, expressed
              in the language of our times. ...
 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Martineau,Harriet
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Harriet Martineau, the daughter of a textile manufacturer from
              Norwich, was born in 1802. Following her education, she began
              writing articles in the 1820s for the Monthly Repository
              and in 1829 moved to London and joined the staff of this journal.
              She broadened her writing to include books on politics and
              economics directed to the general public. Among her influences
              were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Her 1832 book, Illustrations
              of Political Economy sold well, which was followed by Poor
              Laws and Paupers Illustrated (1834).
 
 Martineau then visited the United States for two years, recorded
              her observations in the book, Society in America (1837),
              which commented on the many contradictions between stated
              democratic principles and the reality of life for many Americans,
              particularly women.
 
 She suffered from poor health throughout much of her life and
              died of bronchitis in 1876.
 
 The old practice of man holding man as property is nearly
              exploded among civilized nations; and the analogous barbarism of
              man holding the surface of the globe as property cannot long
              survive. The idea of this being a barbarism is now fairly formed,
              admitted and established among some of the best minds of the time;
              and the result is, as in all such cases, ultimately secure.
 
 
  [From: Autobiography (1855),
              Vol.II, Sec. 10, p. 119]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Martineau,Harriet
 
 
 | Before any effectual social renovation can take place, men
              must efface the abuse which has grown up out of the transition
              from the feudal to the more modern state; the abuse of land being
              held as absolute property.
 
 
  [From: Autobiography (1855),
              Vol.II, Sec. 10, p. 119]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Marx, Karl
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Monopoly of land is the basis of monopoly in capital.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Marx,Karl
 | We have seen that the expropriation of the mass of the people
              from the soil forms the basis of the capitalist mode of
              production. The essence of a free policy, on the contrary,
              consists in this: That the bulk of the soil is still public
              property, and every settler on it, therefore, can turn part of it
              into his private property and individual means of production
              without hindering the later settlers in the same production.
 
 
 [From: Capital, Chap. XXXIII,
              English Translation, pp. 793-4]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              McArdle, Peter J.
 | Peter J. McArdle (1874-1940) was first elected to Pittsburgh City
              Council in 1911; he served for over 27 years. He was a member of
              the City Planning Commission. Previous to public office he had
              worked in a rolling mill and was active in union councils within
              the steel industry.
 
 The graded tax law has, in my opinion, been of decided benefit
              to the City, and to home owners in particular, by furnishing an
              added impetus to the development of vacant land located within the
              city limits.
 
 
  [Source of the above quote is not
              known. Reprinted from literature published by the Henry George
              Foundation of America]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              McConnell,Campbell
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | In the cities the present arrangement of relatively high
              property taxes on buildings and relatively low taxes on land tends
              to have perverse effects upon incentives. The relatively light
              taxes on land mean that landowners find the tax costs involved in
              holding vacant land ot be comparatively small, and so they are
              encouraged to withhold land form productive uses in order to
              speculate on increases in its value. Such action -- or inaction --
              prevents growth of the property-tax base and contributes to the
              fiscal problems of the cities.
 
 
  [Quote from the textbook, Economics,
              1978 edition, p.754] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              McGinnis, Bernard B.
 | As a young man active in Democratic politics and civic
              movements, I joined in a popular movement in 1913 which resulted
              in the Legislature adopting a Graded Tax for cities of the second
              class. It was a very simple measure endorsed by leading civic
              organizations and newspapers and sponsored politically by William
              A. Magee, then the Republican Mayor of Pittsburgh.
 
 Since 1925 the cities of Pittsburgh and Scranton have taxed all
              dwellings and other buildings at just one-half of the rate levied
              on the land; the purpose being to encourage private improvements
              to real estate and to discourage the holding of valuable land for
              speculation.
 
 This Graded Tax plan is generally accepted in Pittsburgh and has
              meant lower taxes for the great majority of home owners as well as
              for others whose properties are well improved. It has been
              strongly supported through the years by our Mayors and Councilmen,
              both Republican and Democratic. It is also helping Scranton to
              attract new industries and to lower taxes on homes.
 
 
  [Pennsylvania State Senator, 1959]
              
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              McGlynn, Edward (Father)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | He was simply a seer, a prophet, a forerunner sent by God, and
              we can say in all reverence and in the words of the Scriptures
              when they said that "There was a man sent from God, whose
              name was John he was sent to bear witness to the light." I
              believe I am not guilty of any profanation of the sacred
              Scriptures when I say there was a man sent from God, and his name
              was Henry George.
 
 
  [source not known] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Michener, James
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | No nation can avoid land reform. All it can do is to determine
              the course it will take: bloody revolution or taxation.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
               Mill,James
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | James Mill discussed land taxation much more fully than did Adam
              Smith or Ricardo. In his Political Economy, 1821, he suggested [p.
              243] that in a new country the rent of land would be a source
              peculiarly adapted to defray the expenditures of the state without
              burdening anyone. But in old countries:
 
 ... where land has ... been converted into private property,
              without making rent in a peculiar manner answerable for the public
              expenses; where it has been bought and sold upon such terms, and
              the expectations of individuals have been adjusted to that order
              of things, rent of land could not be taken to supply exclusively
              the wants of the government without injustice.
 
 James Mill's Political Economy is noteworthy in that it contains
              the earliest thorough consideration of the merits of a tax upon
              the "unearned increment" of land values. Much of the
              credit should be given to James Mill rather than, as is usual, to
              his more distinguished son. James Mill wrote in Political Economy
              [p.247]:
 
 This continual increase, arising from the circumstances of the
              community, and from nothing in which the land-holders themselves
              have any peculiar share, does seem a fund no less peculiarly
              fitted for appropriation to the purposes of the state, than the
              whole of the rent in a country where land had never been
              appropriated.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Mill, John Stuart
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | John Stuart Mill, in his Political Economy, 1848, took
              the position that land ownership is less justifiable than the
              ownership of other wealth. "Landed property," he said, "is
              felt, even by those most tenacious of its rights, to be a
              different thing from other property."
 
 When the sacredness of property is talked of, it should always
              be remembered that any such sacredness doe snot belong in the same
              degree to landed property. No man made the land. It is the
              original inheritance of the whole species. Its appropriation is
              wholly a question of general expediency. When private property in
              land is not expedient, it is unjust. It is no hardship to anyone
              to be excluded from what others have produced: they were not bound
              to produce it for his use, and he loses nothing by not sharing in
              what otherwise would not have existed at all. But it is some
              hardship to be born into the world and to find all nature's gifts
              previously engrossed, and no place left for the new-comer. [book
              2, ch. 2, sec. 26.]
 
 The ordinary progress of a society which increases in wealth, is at all
times tending to augment the incomes of landlords; to give them both a
greater amount and a greater proportion of the wealth of the community,
independently of any trouble or outlay incurred by themselves. They grow
richer, as it were in their sleep, without working, risking, or
economizing. What claim have they, on the general principle of social
justice, to this accession of riches? [Book 5 Chapter 2 Section 28]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Mill,John Stuart
 | Those who think that the land of a country exists for the sake
              of a few thousand land-owners, and that so long as rents are paid,
              society and government have fulfilled their function, may see in
              this consummation a happy end to Irish difficulties. But this is
              not a time, nor is the human mind now in a condition, in which
              such insolent pretensions can be maintained. The land of Ireland,
              the land of every country, belongs to the people of that country.
 
 
  [From: Political Economy,
              Book II., Chap. 10, Sec. 1]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Mill,John Stuart
 | A tax on rent falls wholly on the landlord. There are no means
              by which he can shift the burden upon anyone else.
 
 
  [From: Elements of Political
              Economy, Book V, Chap. III, Sec. 2]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Mill,John Stuart
 | The essential principle of property being to assure to all
              persons what they have produced by their labor and accumulated by
              their abstinence, this principle cannot apply to what is not the
              product of labor, the raw material of the earth.
 
 
  [From: Political Economy,
              Book II, Chap. 2, Sec. 5]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Mill,John Stuart
 | When the "sacredness of property" is talked of, it
              should always be remembered that any such sacredness does not
              belong in the same degre to landed property.
 
 
  [From: Political Economy,
              Book II, Chap. 2, Sec. 6]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Mill,John Stuart
 | The greatest "burthen on land is the landlords."
 
 
  [From: Elements of Political
              Economy, Book II, Chap. 2, Sec. 6]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Mill,John Stuart
 | The social problem of the future we consider to be how to
              unite the greatest individual liberty of action with a common
              ownership in the raw material of the globe, and an equal
              participation of all in the benefits of combined labor.
 
 
  [From: Autobiography, Chap.
              VII, p.232]
 
 |  
          
            | 
 Mill,John Stuart
 | The ordinary progress of a society which increases in wealth
              is at all times to augment the incomes of landlords -- to give
              them both a greater amount and a greater proportion of the wealth
              of the community, independently of any trouble or outlay incurred
              by themselves. They grow richer as it were in their sleep, without
              working, risking or economizing. What claims have they, on the
              general principlesof social justice, to this accession of riches?
 
 
  [From: Principles of Political
              Economy, Book V, Chap. 2, Sec. 5]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Miller,Karen
 | Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs,
              responded to a question from Walter Rybeck about whether her
              Housing Task Force had looked at the two-rate property tax, as
              follows:
 
 No, because the eleven cities using that form of property tax
              don't have an affordable housing problem.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Mitchell,Margaret
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | 
 Land is the only thing in the world that amounts to anything,
              for 'Tis the only thing in this world that lasts, 'Tis the only
              thing worth working for, worth fighting for -- worth dying for.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Modigliani,Franco
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | It is important that rent of land be retained as a source of
              government revenue. Some persons who could make excellent use of
              land would be unable to raise money for the purchase price.
              Collecting rent annually provides access to land for persons with
              limited access to credit.
 
 
 [Franco (1918-1985) was the 1985 winner
              of the Nobel Prize for economics]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Moley, Raymond
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Private investment for urban rebuilding can be attracted by
              modifying our tax system to encourage new construction and better
              land use. High land taxes and lower levies on improvements will
              compel owners to build or sell to those who will build. To a
              greater extent this emphasis on a change to land taxation is being
              accepted by planners, architects, public authorities and
              economists.
 
 The point is not a new one. Those who improve their property are
              now penalized by higher taxes. Those who maintan slums are
              rewarded by a rise in land values.
 
 
  [From: Newsweek, August 21,
              1967] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Mondale, Walter
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | As you know, land is subject to local rather than federal
              jurisdiction, but it would be interesting to see the results of
              local experiments along the lines you suggest. One of the great
              advantages of our federal system is that it permits such
              experiments to take place.
 
 There are, however, a number of things which the federal
              government could do to further the taxation of land values. It
              could levy such a federal tax itself and this would be much
              preferable to taxes on labor and capital investment. It could
              establish a new city based solely on land value taxation in order
              to demonstrate the feasibility of that principle. It could remove
              the income tax deduction for the property tax insofar as it falls
              on buildings, thereby encouraging localities to raise more of
              their property tax on land instead. And finally, it could so
              adjust the revenue sharing formula that the more a city relies on
              the taxation of land values for its local revenue, the larger its
              federal revenue share would be.
 
 
  [From a letter dated May 19, 1983 to
              the editor of Incentive Taxation] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Moore, Stephen
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | I have long been an admirer of the Henry George philosophy, as
              I think most of us here at the Cato Institute are.
 
 
  [199-]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              More,Thomas
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | When an insatiable wretch, who is a plague to the whole
              country, resolves to enclose many thousand acres of ground the
              owners as well as the tenants are turned out of their possessions
              by trick or by main force, or being wearied out with ill usage
              they are forced to sell them.
 
 
 [From: Utopia (1516), Book I]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              More,Thomas
 | "The increase of pasture", said I, "by which
              you sheep, which are naturally mild, and easily kept in order, may
              be said now to devour men, and unpeople, not only villages, but
              towns; for wherever it is found that the sheep of any soil yield a
              softer and richer wool than ordinary, there the nobility and
              gentry, and even those holy men the abbots, not contented with the
              old rents which their farms yielded, nor thinking it enough that
              they, living at their ease, do not good to the public, resolve to
              doit hurt instead of good. They stop the course of agriculture,
              destroying houses and towns, reserving only the churches, and
              enclose grounds that they may lodge their sheep in them.
 
 As if forests and parks had swallowed up to little of the land,
              those worthy countrymen turn the best inhabited places in
              solitudes, for when an insatiable wretch, who is a plague to his
              country, resolves to enclose many thousand acres of ground, the
              owners as well as tenants are turned out of their possessions, by
              tricks, or by main force, or being wearied out with ill-usage,
              they are forced to sell them. By which means those miserable
              people, both men and women, married and unmarried, old and young,
              with their poor but numerous families (since country busines
              requires many hands), are all forced to change their seats, not
              knowing whither they go; and they must sell almost for nothing
              their household stuff, which could not bring them much money, even
              though they might stay for a buyer.
 
 When that little money is at an end, for it will be soon spent,
              what is left for them to do, but either to steal and so to be
              hanged (God knows how justly), or to go about and beg? And if they
              do this, they are put in prison as idle vagabonds; while they
              would willingly work, but can find none that will hire them; for
              there is no more occasion for country labor, to which they have
              been bred, when there is no arable ground left. One shepherd can
              look after a flock which will stock an extent of ground that would
              require many hands if it were to be ploughed and reaped. This
              likewise in many places raises the price of corn.
 
 
 [From: Utopia  (1516), Book 1]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              More,Thomas
 
 
 | There is a great number of noblemen among you, that are
              themselves as idle as drones, tht subsist on other men's labor, on
              the labor of their tenants, whom, to raise their revenues, they
              pare to the quick.
 
 
 [From: Utopia (1516), Book I]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              More,Thomas
 
 
 | For they account it a very just cause of wr for a nation to
              hinder others from possessing a part of the soil, of which they
              make no use, but which is suffered to lie idle and cultivated;
              since every man has by the law of Nature a right to such waste
              portion of the earth as is necessary for his subsistence.
 
 
 [From: Utopia (1516), Book II,
              tit. Of Their Traffic]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Morley,John
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | It will be thought an intolerable thing that men shall derive
              enormous increments of income from the growth of towns to which
              they have contributed nothing -- that they shall be able to sweep
              into their coffers what they have not produced -- that they shall
              be able to go on throttling towns, as they are well known to do in
              some cases. It is impossible to suppose that the system will not
              be vigorously, powerfully, persistently and successfully attacked.
 
 
  [From a speech at Forfar, 4 October,
              1897. Reprinted in The Times, 5 October, 1897, p.5, column
              3]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Morris,William
 (1834-1896)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Toward the end of the 1870s, Morris became increasingly involved
              in political activism, and by 1883 he had joined H. M. Hyndman's
              Socialist League. Rejecting Hyndman's grand plan to unify all
              socialist groups in England, Morris helped form the new Socialist
              League and became the editor of its journal. When the Socialist
              League waxed more extreme and the prospects for real revolution
              grew dim, Morris left the organization and founded the Hammersmith
              Socialist Society, which met at Kelmscott House and served as a
              forum for Sunday evening lectures and discussion on political and
              social issues.
 
 Not seldom a piece of barren ground or swamp, worth nothing in
              itself, becomes a source of huge fortune to him from the
              development of a town or a district, and he pockets the results of
              the labor of thousands upon thousands of men, and calls it his
              property.
 
 
  [From: Signs of Change
              (1888), p.188]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Morris,William
 
 
 | Society will be changed from its basis when we make the form
              of robbery called profit impossible by giving labor full and free
              access to the means of fructification -- i.e., to raw material.
 
 
  [From: Signs of Change
              (1888), p.201]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Moses | It is written in Leviticus X MV:XXIII that Jehovah said to Moses:
 
 The land shall not be sold forever; for the land is mine.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Murphey, Dwight D. 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Do Market Economies Allocate Resources Optimally? A response by
              Dweight D. Murphey, Prof. of Business Law, Wichita State
              University, to Walter Block:
 
 Nor are such societies sufficiently sensitive to the moral
              issues. An inequality borne out of differences in ability, effort,
              character, market discernment, and the like, is a morally
              justifiable inequality. But, as henry George pointed out a century
              ago, some wealth accrues to individuals without any relationship
              either to merit or to a productive meeting of consumers' needs.
              George made this point with regard to the increase in land values
              that comes from increasing population near the land. During the
              past century, most classical liberals, including myself until
              recently, have not become followers of George (who was in all
              other ways a devout free-market thinker) because it has seemed
              better to let the market work without qualification than to make
              an admission that socialists could use to their own advantage.
              Now, however, with the rapid advance of computerization, robotics,
              materials sciences, and biotechnology, Henry George's observation
              becomes even more pertinent. Those in the year 2030, for example,
              who make a fortune as computer experts will make only a part of
              that income from their own effort; instead, they will have
              inherited from the civilization in which they live the work of
              countless geniuses who will have preceded them, and much of their
              income will be due to those previous successes. How appropriate
              will it be then to say that "any amount of inequality is all
              right, because it arises out of the successful peoples' success in
              the market"? Will future classical liberals be able to say
              that with a clear conscience if billions of people are faring
              quite badly?
 
 
 [From: Markets & Morality,
              Vol. 2, No. 2, Fall 1999]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Murphy, Dennis
 | If you improve your home by remodeling or building an
              addition, your taxes will rise, because we tax the improvements.
              If you own a rental property, and make improvements for your
              tenants, the taxes will increase, regardless of location. Tax only
              the land and tax it at a rate appropriate to its highest and best
              use.
 
 The results would be dramatic.
 
 Would the old Flame Tavern sit empty year after year? Or would
              ordinary economic incentives push the owners -- whom, by the way,
              I do not know -- to either make better use of the opportunities
              presented by these sites or sell to willing buyers who would?
 
 
 [Dean of the College of Business & Economics, Western
              Washington University. Quote from the Bellingham Washington
              Herald, June 2, 1966] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Murray,J.F.N.
 | Murray is a prominent assessor and author of Principles and
              Practice of Valuation, (Sidney. Commonwealth Institute of
              Valuers, Fourth Edition, 1969, a leading textbook on appraising in
              Australia.
 
 Valuation is the most important subject in the social
              sciences, but it has always been outside the scope of economics as
              taught in the universities. ...It is maintained that a
              re-integration of the theory of valuation with the main body of
              economic theory would lead to an advancement of learning and to a
              soundly-based national economy.
 
 
 [source not identified, only in 1967,
              from an academic publication] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Muskie,Edmund
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | We must ask whether it is fair that our federal tax laws --
              which mermit homeowners to deduct property tax payments from their
              income tax -- provide no real relief for apartment dwellers whose
              rent is increased by their landlords as a result of these same
              property taxes.
 
 Still a more basic question is whether any property taxes should
              be levied against buildings and improvements (or) whether they
              should be levied completely or primarily on land value itself.
              [There is a good argument that it is] socially undesirable [to tax
              the land speculator less than the owner who improves his proerty,
              that urban decay can be blamed on property taxes which penalize
              properties, and that property taxes encourage land speculation
              rather than logical land development].
 
 
 [Source: Hugh I. Morris. "Muskie
              Weighs Probe Of Property Taxes," The Evening Bulletin,
              8 January 1971.]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Nader, Ralph
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Nader's group Public Citizen wrote a booklet recommending:
 
 We reduce taxes on people and increase taxes on nonrenewables.
 
 A 1994 commentary on urban sprawl contained this observation
              about the property tax:
 
 Site-value property taxation may also spark greater
              development in cities by taxing land, not buildings. Unlike
              traditional taxation -- which rewards developers who put up cheap,
              tacky housing and strip malls -- site-value taxation gives
              developers the incentive to build gracious, durable buildings.
              Allowances for affordable housing, however, need to be part of
              site-value schemes.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Nader, Ralph | We need a big debate on different kinds of taxation, to talk
              about how corporations are freeloading on public services and
              getting tax breaks while taxes are falling on workers and smaller
              businesses. We need to open a debate about land taxation and Henry
              George, to tax bad things, not good things, and not to tax people
              who go to work every day.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Nechyba, Thomas J.
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | The idea tht land value taxation is unrealistic or would drive
              land prices into negative numbers is based on a static view of the
              economy, where no one responds to tax changes by substituting one
              factor for another. Once you accept that behavior will change in
              response to taxes, that static view no longer applies. Under these
              fairly conservative assumptions, tax reforms that use land taxes
              to eliminate entire classes of distortionary taxes are
              economically feasible in virtually all states.
 
 
 [From a "Faculty Profile"
              interview published in Land Lines, the newsletter of the
              Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, January 2002. Mr. Nechyba is
              professor of economics at Duke University, Durham, N.C.]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Necker,Jacques
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Nearly all civil institutions were made for the benefit of the
              rich. If we peruse our books of law, we are startled at finding
              everywhere the confirmation of teh fact. It could almost be said
              that a few people, after dividing the earth among themselves,
              ordained laws to fortify themselves against the multitude.
 
 
 [From: Essay on the Corn-Laws
              (1775), Part III, Chap. 12, Oeuvres, Vol. I, p. 333]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Necker,Jacques
 
 | The right of inheriting property is a law of men; it was
              established for their welfare and can only be continued on that
              condition. He who, at the beginning of society, staked out a piece
              of ground, and threw there some seed which nature had
              spontaneously produced elsewhere, could never have obtained on
              this title alone the exclusive right of holding the ground for his
              descendants forever.
 
 
  [From: Essay on the Corn Laws
              (1775), Oeuvres Completes, Vol.I, p.142]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              New Republic editors | As Henry George explained more than a century ago in Progress
              and Poverty, the cost of natural resources is nothing more than a
              tax on the productive elements of the economy -- labor and
              capital.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Newcomb,Simon
 (1835-1909)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 |  The doctrine that the soil is of natural right the
              common property of the human race, and that each individual should
              be allowed to enjoy his share, is now tacitly admitted by many
              eminent economists in England and France. 
 
  [From: "The Labor Question,"
              North American Review, July, 1879, p.151] 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Newman,Francis William
 
 
 | Newman was born in Born in London, and graduated from Oxford in
              1826. He was elected fellow of Balliol College Oxford in the same
              year but resigned in 1830, leaving for Baghdad to serve as
              assistant in the mission of the Rev. A. N. Groves. In 1833 he
              returned to England and eventually accepted the position of
              classical tutor in an unsectarian college at Bristol. In 1840 he
              became Professor of Latin in Manchester New College, a Unitarian
              seminary at York. In 1846 he quit this appointment to become
              professor in University College, London, where he remained until
              1869. In 1850, he produced ttwo works, Phases of Faith and
              Passages from the History of my Creed, the former an analysis of
              the relations of the spirit of man with the Creator; the latter a
              religious autobiography detailing the author's passage from
              Calvinism to pure theism.
 
 He also wrote on logic, political economy, English reforms,
              Austrian politics, Roman history, and many other subjects. His
              miscellaneous essays were collected in several volumes before his
              death. He died in 1897.
 
 Here is the fundamental error, the crude and monstrous
              assumption, that the land which God has given to our nation, is or
              can be the private property of anyone. It is a usurpation exactly
              similar to that of slavery.
 
 
  [From: Lectures on Political
              Economy (1851), Lecture VI., p. 133]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Netzer, Dick
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | My ideal system of local finance would comprise user charges
              and land value taxation.
 
 
  [Dean, Graduate School of Political
              Science, New York University; quote from Property Tax Reform,
              Urban Institute, 1973, edited by George Peterson]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Netzer, Dick
 | User fees and land-value taxation are considered by most
              experts as the best way to finance city government.
 
 
  [Dean, New York University; from
              remarks at a 1982 meeting of the Federal Reserve Bank in
              Philadelphia]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              NEW YORK TIMES | Too bad that Henry George, the author of Progress and Poverty,
              is not around to advise New York State's Comptroller, Edward
              Regan, on the economics of land and housing. Analyzing New York
              City's J-51 program to stimulate the rehabilitation of old
              buildings with tax concessions. Mr. Regan says it costs a fortune,
              or at least too much. Henry George would have told Mr. Regan that
              he has it exactly wrong. It's the tax on building improvements,
              not the tax abatement, that leads to poverty.
 
 
  [editorial, August 5, 1980]
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Norquist,John
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Question and Answer with Mayor John Norquist of Milwaukee,
              Wisconsin. Tuesday, January 26, 1999, at The Landmark Series:
 
 Q: Have you looked at alternative property tax systems such as
              a two-tier land value based system to encourage efficient use?
 
 A: Great idea and almost impossible to get politically.
              Usually the constitutions in most states block it but it's been
              great for Pittsburgh. You almost can't find an empty lot in
              downtown Pittsburgh.They've done a lot of things wrong in
              Pittsburgh but one thing they did right was having this land value
              taxation so there's no incentive to have an empty lot. Having a
              parking lot doesn't make sense economically so the buildings fill
              in and you don't have these big empty spots. So if you can do it
              in Minnesota, go for it. It's good for the city.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Norris, Kathleen
 | Any one who really fears a revolution in America ought to
              reread Henry George's "Progress and Poverty," one of the
              great social documents of all time. I first read it thirty years
              ago. ...Today the book is good as ever, and the theory as sane.
              ... In all the years -- with the travel, study, opportunity for
              observation of social conditions -- in all these yers I have never
              known his premises to be shaken in the least.
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Nowak, Jeremy
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | "Cities should abolish all business taxes that inhibit
              the location of startup firms or discourage investment in
              productivity-enhancing equipment or practices, including all forms
              of gross receipts or turnover and net profits taxes. Cities should
              also replace the business property tax with a tax on the market
              value of land, coupling the land tax with the broader use of
              business improvement districts or tax increment finance districts
              to pay for major infrastructure investments. Land taxes, which may
              initially be extraordinarily low, even zero, in some especially
              distressed neighborhoods, have several advantages over property
              taxes in keeping a city's economy competitive. They discourage
              speculative land banking. They encourage businesses to place as
              much capital on property as is economically justifiable because
              non-land forms of real property are not taxed. They strongly
              encourage city government practices that preserve the value of
              land. And, finally, they are a powerful incentive to maintain
              properties.
 
 "Local personal taxes commonly take three forms: sales
              taxes, wage or income taxes, and property taxes, the latter being
              the most common. A residential property tax has two components-a
              land tax and a tax on the value of the structure. The land
              component of the residential property tax should be assessed on an
              equal basis with the business land tax, again providing incentives
              to develop in neighborhoods with low land values, as well as
              preventing speculative land banking."
 
 
 [From: "Only Radical Strategies
              Can Help America's Most Distressed Cities," by Edward W. Hill
              and Jeremy Nowak. Brookings Review, Summer 2000, Vol.18,
              No.3, Pages 22-26] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Oates, Wallace
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | What the Pittsburgh experience suggests to us is that the
              movement to a graded tax system can, in the right setting, provide
              some stimulus to local building activity. The primary role of the
              land tax in all this is to provide the additional source of
              revenues that allows a reduction in the rate on improvements.
 
 
  [Professor of Economics, University
              of Maryland; from a research report written with Robert Schwab]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Ogilvie,William
 | William Ogilvie, Professor of Humanities in King's College,
              Aberdeen, was an eighteenth century thinker who anticipated
              certain of Henry George's ideas. In 1782 he published anonomously
              An Essay on the Right of Property in Land with respect to its
              Foundation in the Law of Nature. He believed that the equal
              right of all men to the earth was "a birthright which every
              citizen still retains", and as a means for securing that
              right he proposed a "progressive agrarian law", under
              which men were to be permitted to claim their birthright share
              from unoccupied lands, and those holding more than this share were
              gradually to be deprived of their surplus of land, retaining,
              however, the title to any improvements which they might have made.
 
 Ogilvie's ideas on taxation were somewhat vague, but he wrote in
              a footnote that he believed a land tax to be the most equitable
              form of tax. The landowner, he believed, enjoyed a revenue without
              performing a corresponding social service. He suggested a tax on
              barren lands to force the owner either to cultivate or dispose of
              them. Ogilvie was probably the first to suggest definitely a tax
              on the increment of land values. He wrote:
 
 A tax on all augmentation of rents, even to the extent of one
              half of the increase, would be at once the most equitable, the
              most productive, the most easily collected, and the least liable
              to evasion of all possible taxes, and might with inconceivable
              advantage disencumber a great nation from all those injudicious
              imposts by which its commercial exchanges are retarded and
              restrained, and its domestic manufactures embarrassed.[p.9]
 
 Ogilivie also wrote about access to land as a natural right:
 
 When a child is born, we recognise that it has a natural right
              to its mother's milk, and no one can deny that it has the same
              right to mother-earth. It is really its mother-earth, plus the dew
              and sunshine from heaven and a little labour, that supplies the
              milk and everything else required for its subsistence. The monster
              that would deprive the babe of its mother's milk, or would
              monopolise the breasts of several mothers, to the exclusion of
              several children, is not more deserving of being destroyed than
              the monster who seizes absolute possession of more than his share
              of the common mother of mankind, to the exclusion of his
              fellow-creatures.
 
 
  [From the Preface to William
              Ogilvie's "Birthright in Land" (1782), Augustus M Kelley
              edition (1970), p.xix]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Ogilvie,William
 | Ogilvie begins his "Essay on the Right of Property in Land"
              with the following:
 
 1. "All right of property is founded either in occupancy
              or labor. The earth having been given to mankind in common
              occupancy, each individual seems to have by nature a right to
              possess and cultivate an equal share. This right is little
              different from that which he has to the freeuse of the open air
              and running water; thought not so indispensably requisite at short
              intervals for his actual existence, it is not less essential to 
              the welfare and right state of his life through all of its
              progressive stages.
 
 2. "No individual can derive from this general of occupancy
              a title to any more than any equal share of the soil of his
              country. His actual possession of more cannot of right preclude
              the claim of any other person who is not already possessed of such
              equal share.
 
 3. "This title to an equal shre of property in land seems
              original, inherent, and indefeasible by any act or determination
              of others, though capable of being alienated by our own. It is a
              birthright which every citizen still retains. Though by entering
              into society and partaking of its advantages, he must be supposed
              to have submitted this natural right to such regulations as may be
              established for the general good, yet he can never be understood
              to have tacitly renounced it altogether; --
 
 4. "Every state or community ought in justice to reserve for
              all its citizens the opportunities of entering upon or returning
              to land resuming this their birthright and natural employment,
              whenever they are inclined to do so.
 
 "Whatever inconveniences may -- accompany this reservation,
              they ought not to stand in the way of essential justice.
 
 5. "In many rude communities, this original right has been
              respected, and their pubilc institutions accommodated to it, by
              annual, or at least frequent partitions of the soil, as among the
              ancient Germans, and among the native Irish even in Spencer's
              time.
 
 "Wherever conquests have taken place, this right has been
              commonly subverted and effaced.
 
 "In the progress of commercial arts and refinements, it is
              suffered to fall into obscurity and neglect.
 
 7. "That right which the landholder has to an estate,
              consisting of a thousand times his own original equal share of the
              soil, cannot be founded in the general right of occupancy, but in
              the labor which he and those to whom he has succeeded, or from
              whom he has purchased, have bestowed on the improvement and
              fertilization of the soil. To this extent, it is natural and just;
              but such a right founded in labor cannot supersede that natural
              right of occupancy, which nine hundred and ninety-nine other
              persons have to their equal shares of the soil, in its original
              state ..."
 
 9. "On the first of these maxims depend the freedom and
              prosperity of the lower ranks. On the second, the perfection of
              the art of agriculture."
 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Ogilvie,William
 | The earth having been given to mankind in common occupancy,
              each individual seems to have by nature a right to possess and
              cultivate an equal share.
 
 
 [From: Essay on the Right of
              Property in Land (1781), Part I, Section I]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Ogilvie,William
 | Internal convulsions have arisen in many countries by which
              the decisive power of the State has been thrown, for a short while
              at least, into the hands of the collective power of the people. In
              these junctures they might have obtained a just re-establishment
              of their natural rights to independence of cultivation and to
              property in land, had they been themselves aware of their title to
              such rights, and had there been any leaders prepared ot direct
              them in the mode of stating their just claim, and supporting it
              with necessary firmness and becoming moderation.
 
 
 [From: Essay on the Right of
              Property in Land (1781), Part II, Section 3, Paragraph 57]
              
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              O'Rell,Max
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | I hold that the earth was meant for the human race and not for
              a few privileged ones.
 
 
 [From: North American Review,
              January, 1899, p.36]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Paine,Thomas
 (1737-1809)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | In the age of rebellion against monarchy and landed aristocracy,
              Paine brought his ideas from the Old World to North America. He
              wrote the pamphlet Common Sense which helped to ignite the
              spirit of rebellion in the colonial citizens of England's
              colonies. In a later pamphlet, Agrarian Justice, he wrote:
 
 [I]t is the value of the improvement, only, and not the earth
              itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor, therefore,
              of cultivated lands, owes the community a ground-rent (for I know
              of no better term to express the idea) for the land which he
              holds; and it is from this ground-rent that the fund proposed in
              this plan is to issue. ...The plan I have to propose ... is, To
              create a national fund, out of which there shall be paid to every
              person, when arrived at the age of twenty-one yers ... a
              compensation in part, for the loss of his or her natural
              inheritance, by the introduction of landed property ...
 
 Men did not make the earth, and though he had a natural right to
              occupy it, he had no right to locate as his property in perpetuity
              any part of it; neither did the Creator of the earth open a
              land-office, from whence the first title-deeds should issue.
 
 "The earth, in its natural state 
 is supporting but
              a small number of inhabitants, compared with shat it is capable of
              doing in a cultivated state. And impossible to separate the
              improvement made by cultivation from the earth itself upon which
              that improvement is made, the idea of landed property arose from
              that inseparable connection; but it is nevertheless true that it
              is value of the improvement only, and not the earth itself, that
              is individual property. Every proprietor, therefore, of cultivated
              land owes to the community a ground-rent, for I know no better
              term to express the idea by, for the land which he holds. 
Cultivation
              is one of the greatest natural improvements ever made. . . .But
              the landed monopoly that began with it has dispossessed more than
              half the inhabitants of every nation of their natural inheritance."
              [Thomas Paine, Agrarian Justice, 1797]
 
 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Paley,William
 (Archdeacon of Carlisle)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | If you should see a flock of pigeons in a field of corn, and
              if (instead of each picking where and what he liked, taking just
              as much as it wanted and no more) you should be ninety-nine of
              them gathering all they got into a heap and reserving nothing for
              themselves but the chaff and refuse; keeping this heap for one,
              and that the weakest, perhaps worst, pigeon of the flock; sitting
              round and looking on all the winter whilst this one was devouring,
              throwing about and wasting it; and if a pigeon more hardy or
              hungry than the rest touched a grain of the hoard, all the others
              instantly flying upon it and tearingit to pieces -- if you should
              see this you would see nothing more than what is every day
              practiced and established among men.
 
 
 [From: Moral and Political
              Philosophy (1785), Book III, Part I., Chap. 1]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Paley,William
 
 
 | We now speak of property in land; and there is a difficulty in
              explaining the origin of this property consistently with the law
              of nature; for the land was once, no doubt, common; and the
              question is, how any particular part of it oculd justly be taken
              out of the common and so approprirated to the first owner as to
              give him a better right to it than others; and what is more, a
              right to exclude others from it. Moralists have given many
              different accounts of this matter, which diversity alone, perhaps,
              is a proof that none of them are satisfactory.
 
 
  [From: Moral and Political
              Philosophy (1785), Book III, Part I, Chap. 4]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Penn,William
 (1644-1718)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | One of the first to recognize the promise of ground rents as a
              just source of public revenue was William Penn, the founder of
              the North American colony of Pennsylvania. Penn wrote in 1682:
 
 If all men were so far tenants to the public that the
              superfluities of grain and expense (meaning "surpluses")
              were applied to the exigencies thereto (meaning "community
              needs"), it would put an end to taxes, leave not a beggar,
              and make the greatest bank for national trade in Europe.>
 
 
 [From: Reflections and Maxims, Sec. 222, Works V.,
              pp. 190-1] 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              PENNSYLVANIAECONOMY
 LEAGUE
 | From a 1988 study, Revised Recovery Plan for the City of
              Clairton, Pa:
 
 ... attaching different millage rates to land and buildings
              will accomplish a more equitable distribution of the property tax.
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Pettigrew, R.F.
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | From a letter written 19, July, 1917 printed in Everyman (October
              1917) by R.F. Pettigrew, former U.S. Senator from the state of
              South Dakota:
 
 Tax reform has been tried since the days of Ham Arabbie who
              announced it in a code of laws of Babylon 2300 years before
              Christ. But the Single Tax (another name for free land) is of more
              recent origin and thereis but one form of it.
 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Phelps, William Lyon
 | I am delighted to have the Anniversay edition of "Progress
              and Poverty." When I was an undergraduate in college, in the
              year 1998, Professor Arthur Hadley, later President Hadley,
              devoted an entire course in my senior year to this book.
 
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Plato 
 
  ENLARGE
 | When discord arose, then the two races were drawn different
              ways; the iron and brass fell to acquiring mney and land and huses
              and gold and silver; but the gold and silver races, having the
              true riches in their own nature, inclined towards virtue and the
              ancient order of things. There was a battle between them, and at
              last they agreed to distribute their land and houses among
              individual owners; and they enslaved their friends and
              maintainers, whom they had formerly protected.
 
 
  [From: The Republic, Jowett's
              Translation, Book VIII., p.547 (words ascribed to Socrates)]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Pliny(Gaius Plinus Secundus)
 | It is the wide-spread domains that have been the ruin of
              Italy, and soonwill be that of the provinces as well.
 
 
  [From: Natural History, Book
              XVIII., Chap. 7]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Plutarch 
 
  ENLARGE
 | To the end therefore that he might expel out of the state
              arrogance and envy, luxury and crime, and those yet more
              inveterate diseases of want and superfluity, he obtained of them
              to renounce their properties, and to consent to a new division of
              the land, and that they should live altogether on an equal
              footing, -- merit to be their only road to eminence, and the
              disgrace of evil, and credit of worthy acts, their one measure of
              difference as between man and man.
 
 
  [From: Life of Lycurgus]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Plummer,W.C.
 | In 1930, he held the position of Assistant Professor of
              Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelhia, Pennsylvania
 
 While the right of property denotes in every state of society
              the largest powers of exclusive control over wealth which the law
              accords, yes, ... these powers of exclusive use and control are
              various and differ greeatly in different times and places.
              ...Private property ... in land has always ocupied a strong
              position in the United States, and continues to do so at the
              present time. ...
 
 Taxes upon land are a distinct limitation of private property
              rights. Land possesses certain characteristics not found in other
              classes of wealth, and for this reason it has often been regarded
              as a subject for special taxes. ...The purpose of such taxes, if
              they are comparatively small, is to raise revenue for the support
              of the Government; but if they are very large, the predominating
              purpose is usually to bring about reforms in the social system.
 
 
  [From: "Limitations to Private
              Property Rights in Land in the United States," The Annals
              of The American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol.
              CXLVIII, No. 237, March, 1930, p.56]
 
 |  
            | 
              
              Plummer,W.C.
 | Since the publication of Progress and Poverty in 1879 by Henry
              George, in which he advocated what is known as the single tax,
              there have been numerous individuals and groups who would like to
              bring about radical changes in the socio-economic order by further
              limiting private property rights through heavier taxes on land.
              The advocates of the single tax contend that the Government should
              take in taxes the entire economic rent of land, and that this
              should be the only form of taxation. The use of the single tax
              would mean practically the abolition of private property in land
              and the substitution of community ownership. There would probably
              remain the right of private possession, of alienation, and of use
              for productive purposes, but the user of the land would be
              compelled ot pay to society, in the form of taxes, the full
              economic rent. ...Since the market value of land depends upon its
              present and anticipated future income, the introduction of the
              single tax would take from the present owners the equivalent of
              the entire value of their land.
 
 
  [From: "Limitations to Private
              Property Rights in Land in the United States," The Annals
              of The American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol.
              CXLVIII, No. 237, March, 1930, p.57]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Pollock,Frederick
 (1845-1937)
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Pollock was an English jurist, educated at Eton and Cambridge and
              admitted to the bar in 1871. He became professor of jurisprudence
              at Oxford in 1883, a position he retained until 1903. He devoted
              After 1914 he served as judge of the admiralty court of the Cinque
              Ports. His main writings included: The Principles of Contract
              (1876) and the Law of Torts (1887). Pollock also served as
              editor of the Law Quarterly Review from 1885 to 1919 and
              editor in chief (18951935) of the Law Reports from
              1895 to 1935. He collaborated with F. W. Maitland on The
              History of English Law (1895), contributing the material on
              Anglo-Saxon law.
 
 It is commonly supposed that land belongs to its owner in the
              same sense as money or a watch; this has not been the theory of
              the English law since the Norman Conquest, nor has it been so in
              its fullest significance at any time. No absolute ownership of
              land is recognized by our law-books except in the Crown. All lands
              are supposed to be held immediately or mediately of the Crown,
              though no rent or services may be payable and no grant from the
              Crown on record.
 
 
  [From: Land Laws, Chap. I, p.
              12]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
               Precy,Monsieur V.
 | In 1930, this French advocate of land value taxation wrote:
 
 "And so it is with the greatest satisfaction that I am
              able to quote here the pronouncement made by Robert Smillie, the
              English miners' leader, in October 1921: 'It is only lately that I
              have come to understand that the root of the whole social problem
              is to be found in the land question. As long as access to land
              remains forbidden to those who could put it to a useful purpose,
              we shall always see crowds of men, cap in hand, at the doors of
              our factories."
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Pufendorf,Samuel
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | In prnciple I do not see why the sea should be dispensed from
              serving our need and comfort, any more than the land. However ...
              men were left free to make private property of the sea as well as
              of the land, or to leave it in its primitive state, common to all,
              so that it should not belong to one more than to another.
 
 
  [From: Law of Nature and Nations
              (1672), Book IV, Chap. 5, Sec. 5]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Pufendorf,Samuel
 
 
 | All that natural law does is to suggest the establishment of
              property when the welfare of human society demands it, leaving it
              to the wisdom of men to determine whether they should allow
              private property in all things or only in some, and whether they
              should hold those which they appropriate separately or in common,
              leaving the rest to the first occupant, so that no one can assume
              the right to enjoy them alone.
 
 
  [From: Law of Nature and Nations
              (1672), Book IV, Chap. 4, Sec. 4]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Putland, Gavin
 
 
  ENLARGE
 | Gavin Putland, at the Signal Processing Research Centre,
              Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, Australia, wrote:
 
 There is a better way to improve the competitiveness of a
              country's industries: reduce taxes that are passed on in prices
              and increase taxes that are not. The range of taxes that are built
              into prices is wider than is generally supposed. ...Taxes on land
              values, in contract, fall entirely on landowners and cannot be
              passed on in prices. Landowners cannot withdraw land from use in
              order to force users to pay the tax, because the withdrawn land
              generates no income to cover the tax. There is no surer way to
              make a country more competitive, thus protecting jobs in its
              industries, than to replace taxes on labour and capital with taxes
              on land values.
 
 
 [From: a World Bank internet
              discussion, 19 March 2000]
 
 |  
          
            | 
              
              Quesnay,Francois
 
  ENLARGE
 
 
              
              Turgot,A.R. Jacques
 
  ENLARGE
 | During the late eighteenth century in France, the school of
              political economists known as the Physiocrats, which included the
              royal physician, Francois Quesnay and finance minister,
              A. R. Jacques Turgot , also recognized the power of
              collecting ground rent for public purposes. They expressed this
              thought and coined the phrase "impot unique" (i.e., "the
              single tax").
 
 ... the form of assessment which is the most simple, the most
              regular, the most profitable to the state, and the least
              burdensome to the tax-payers, is that which is made proportionate
              to and laid directly on the source of continually regenerated
              wealth (land).
 
 |  BROWSE BY AUTHOR
 |